Michigan Libertarian gov candidates decline to disclose financial details

Neither of the Libertarian Party candidates for Michigan’s governor would release their 2017 tax returns to Bridge Magazine.

Bill Gelineau, who works at a Grand Rapids-area title agency, and John Tatar, a retired teacher from Wayne County’s Redford Township, both said they comply with state campaign finance laws. Anything beyond that, they said, is voluntary.

Libertarians in Michigan will choose their candidate for governor in a primary challenge, the first for the party in state history.

Bill Gelineau

Gelineau would not release his or his wife’s 2016 or 2017 returns, saying that Michigan’s campaign finance reporting rules are “extraordinary” and his wife is entitled to privacy.

He reported to Bridge in February earnings of between $48,000 and $60,000 each for himself and his wife; roughly $700,000 in his 401(k) account and about $450,000 in his wife’s 401(k); a home in Lowell, though he did not disclose its value; and a six-employee title agency that has paper value of about $150,000. He did not disclose any payments for speeches, travel reimbursements or gifts.

Gelineau wrote Bridge in early May that “I made about ($5,000) less (in 2017) as the real estate market was not quite as strong. Our accounts grew nicely in 2017 as the stock market did well — and have subsequently crashed in the last 90 days like everyone else. So, the totals I previously disclosed are a bit smaller than in February.”

He added: “As I stated then, I believe that the whole matter of personal wealth to be vastly overblown. It might be said as an editorial commentary that it's high time we push back against the notion that voters need or deserve to know every detail of our lives.

“Honestly, I think the detail previously provided in broad terms is more than enough to give some idea of our financial standing.

“Two truths about my wife and I. One, we're more fortunate (or have worked harder) than most Michigan citizens. Second, we're not in the same category with Ms. (Gretchen) Whitmer or Mr. (Bill) Schuette. Frankly, I'm not sure any of that matters if we're following the campaign finance rules.”

John Tatar

Tatar did not respond to Bridge’s initial request in February.

In early May, he emailed Bridge: “I am a proponent of the Republic(s) and I am complying with the law that allows me to run for governor. The request to disclose my personal financial information and/or tax returns be they federal or state can only be voluntarily disclosed in the Republic(s); hence I choose not to.

“Any negative inference to my position to not disclose exposes those who hold such negative inferences to be uneducated as to how the Republic(s) are to operate as concerns ‘public functionaries’. Disclosure to campaign finances has already been made and will continue to be made according to the law.”

Facts matter. Trust matters. Journalism matters.

If you learned something from the story you're reading please consider supporting our work. Your donation allows us to keep our Michigan-focused reporting and analysis free and accessible to all. All donations are voluntary, but for as little as $1 you can become a member of Bridge Club and support freedom of the press in Michigan during a crucial election year.

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Donate now

Comment Form

Add new comment

Dear Reader: We value your thoughts and criticism on the articles, but insist on civility. Criticizing comments or ideas is welcome, but Bridge won’t tolerate comments that are false or defamatory or that demean, personally attack, spread hate or harmful stereotypes. Violating these standards could result in a ban.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.


Mon, 05/21/2018 - 7:51pm

If they didn't have something to hide, why wouldn't they release their tax returns?

Erwin Haas
Mon, 05/21/2018 - 9:25pm

The hidden inference here is that a candidate must share information on his personal finances with the fourth estate, else (here elevate the knowing eyebrow) we know that he is hiding something nefarious.

But, what is gained? The reporters are hostile toward private enterprise and in any case too illiterate about business to use this data. Yes, they can pad each article that they write with an endless repetition of "Jones, owner of Flippy Hamburger" as though it were part of Jones' name to pad the word count for which they are paid.

Seriously, no one else cares. Information that merely encourages envy or boosts the paranoia of a few simpletons about some potential bribery, is the mother of humbug.

Jim tomlinson
Tue, 05/22/2018 - 10:18am


Barry Visel
Tue, 05/22/2018 - 3:14pm

I would much rather know their positions on issues facing our State. Please provide reporting on those. I would like to see equal attention devoted to all the candidates positions, not just the R’s and D’s.

Wed, 05/23/2018 - 7:35am

I am a longstanding Libertarian Party member, and while I concur with the accuracy of these candidates about the legal need to comply with the law and nothing more, the fact remains that they are applicants for a job. As a voter, I decide who I will cast my vote for and I will not cast a vote for someone who pugnaciously withholds information from me. After fighting so long to get ballot access for Libertarians in Michigan, it is disappointing that we wind up with candidates who have this attitude. Please don't judge us all by these two gentlemen.