Nessel won’t enforce Michigan Gov. Whitmer’s COVID orders after court ruling

Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel, shown here at an earlier event, announced Sunday she will not enforce Gov. Gretchen Whitmer's coronavirus orders after a Michigan Supreme Court ruling Friday that found Michigan governors can't exercise emergency power without consent of the Legislature. (Bridge file photo)

LANSING — Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel announced Sunday she will no longer enforce Gov. Gretchen Whitmer's executive orders on COVID-19 after the state's highest court deemed an emergency powers law unconstitutional. 

But Nessel's office left open the possibility for local enforcement and said later Sunday it will enforce separate epidemic orders from Michigan Department of Health and Human Services Director Robert Gordon, some of which reinforce Whitmer's executive actions. 

Nessel’s decision cast further uncertainty over the administration’s active response to COVID-19 and doubt on the legitimacy of Whitmer's orders since late April, which a conservative majority on the Michigan Supreme Court said Friday "now lack any basis under Michigan law."

“In light of the Supreme Court’s decision on Friday, the Attorney General will no longer enforce the governor’s executive orders through criminal prosecution," Nessel spokesperson Ryan Jarvi said in a statement shared with Bridge Michigan.  

"However, her decision is not binding on other law enforcement agencies or state departments with independent enforcement authority. 

“It’s her fervent hope that people continue to abide by the measures that Gov. Whitmer put in place — like wearing face masks, adhering to social distancing requirements and staying home when sick — since they’ve proven effective at saving lives." 

Whitmer, who like Nessel is a Democrat, has claimed Friday's Supreme Court decision does not take effect for 21 days. Her office on Sunday reiterated the governor’s belief that “many of the responsive measures she has put in place to control the spread of the virus will continue under alternative sources of authority that were not at issue in the court’s ruling.”

The Supreme Court ruling "raises several legal questions that we are still reviewing," Whitmer spokesperson Tiffany Brown said later Sunday in a statement. "While we are moving swiftly, this transition will take time."

Brown promised an additional explanation in coming days. 

"Make no mistake, [Whitmer] will continue using every tool at her disposal to keep Michigan families, frontline workers, and small businesses safe from this deadly virus," she said.

Enforcement of the Whitmer's orders has been scattershot throughout the pandemic. Even before Friday’s ruling, Nessel has said local police are best equipped to handle violators, while a few police agencies have publicly refused to enforce the orders.

Besides Whitmer’s orders, Michigan Department of Health and Human Services Director Robert Gordon has also  issued separate epidemic orders reinforcing the governor’s mask mandate, workplace safety rules and other regulations. 

Violations of those epidemic orders, which were not challenged and appear to remain in effect, are generally punishable by civil fines of up to $1,000.

Nessel’s decision follows a tweet from her personal account Friday that said she respects the court’s ruling but “fear[s] for the future of our state and for all our residents.”

“If it weren’t for the governor’s actions, countless more of our friends, family and neighbors would have been lost” to the coronavirus, the Sunday statement from Nessel’s office read.

“We can respect both the court’s decision and the advice of medical experts by continuing with these important measures voluntarily.” 

Whitmer has not conducted any interviews with the Michigan media since Friday's dramatic Supreme Court ruling, but she appeared on CNN Sunday morning. 

Host Jake Tapper did not ask the governor about the opinion, but she brought it up while discussing ongoing efforts to fight the virus, noting the court ruled the same day President Donald Trump was hospitalized with COVID-19. 

"The sad irony is that on the day the president was admitted to the hospital with the very virus he called a hoax, the Supreme Court in Michigan undermined my emergency rule, my emergency orders that I've had to enact... to save lives," Whitmer said. 

Tapper noted that Trump did not call the virus itself a hoax but has "called Democratic and media concerns about it a hoax,” which he also called false. Whitmer thanked him for the “clarifying that” and said Trump “called all the concerns, all the effort - he undermined that. He ridiculed us, and he ridiculed the press."

The court’s decision casts into doubt 123 emergency orders Whitmer has issued since late April, after the Legislature refused to extend Michigan’s state of emergency.

During that time, Michigan has had just over 80,400 additional confirmed cases of the coronavirus, or 64 percent of all the cases since the pandemic began, and 2,528 deaths, or 37 percent of the nearly 6,800 COVID-19 deaths recorded.

The court’s order, though, does not appear to impact orders from local health departments or prevent them from issuing new ones. That could create a patchwork of regulations statewide.

Since the court ruling, health officials in Oakland and Ingham counties issued orders requiring face masks in public, while Macomb County Executive Mark Hackel told the Macomb Daily he wouldn't require masks. 

Ingham County Health Official Linda S. Vail also issued orders limiting the size of outdoor and indoor gatherings, including a 125-person cap at restaurants (or 50 percent of normal capacity) and requiring employee health screenings — safeguards Whitmer had also required in her executive orders. Oakland County may soon impose similar limits, Stafford said.

“Health and science experts agree that facial coverings are critical to controlling the virus,” Oakland County Executive David Coulter, a Democrat who is up for re-election, said in a statement. 

“We have come too far to backslide now especially as we want to get kids back to school and our economy moving again. In Oakland County masks will continue to be mandatory by order of our health experts. I am confident that our residents and businesses will continue to keep each other safe and protected.”

Leaders of Michigan's Republican-led Legislature say Friday's Supreme Court ruling means Whitmer will now need to work with them to craft a bipartisan COVID-19 response plan. 

Senate Majority Leader Mike Shirkey on Saturday told Bridge the GOP may codify some Whitmer orders but the state mask mandate and various business regulations are likely on the chopping block.

Dr. Robert Redfield, the director of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, has called masks “the most important powerful public health tool we have” we have to fight COVID-19. 

Shirkey, R-Clarklake, is encouraging the public to wear masks, socially distance and wash hands, but noted he doubts there’s “any appetite” among Republicans for a mandate.

“We’re moving now from an era or a time when the focus was on mandating, dictating and frankly in some cases threatening, to more of an informing and inspiring and encouraging and loving and trusting people to do the right thing” approach, he said.

Asked about COVID outbreaks, Shirkey said "freedom is messy."

He said lawmakers need to move away from a "lingering notion that we could, by restricting everything, basically ignore the fact that the COVID exists and delay everything for perpetuity. The virus ultimately was going to win, it was just going to take a longer time."

Democrats ridiculed Shirkey's comments. 

"I have been flabbergasted by the defeatist and deadly attitude of Republican leaders from the President on down to throw hands up and say, 'It is what it is,'" Sen. Mallory McMorrow, D-Royal Oak, wrote on Twitter.

"We need to prevent as many fatalities as possible until there's a vaccine or treatment."

Facts matter. Trust matters. Journalism matters.

If you learned something from the story you're reading please consider supporting our work. Your donation allows us to keep our Michigan-focused reporting and analysis free and accessible to all. All donations are voluntary, but for as little as $1 you can become a member of Bridge Club and support freedom of the press in Michigan during a crucial election year.

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Donate now

Comment Form

Add new comment

Dear Reader: We value your thoughts and criticism on the articles, but insist on civility. Criticizing comments or ideas is welcome, but Bridge won’t tolerate comments that are false or defamatory or that demean, personally attack, spread hate or harmful stereotypes. Violating these standards could result in a ban.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Comments

A MI citizen
Sun, 10/04/2020 - 4:29pm

AG Nessel, and the Governor should just let the law go. Fight it, but allow it to be rescinded IMMEDIATELY! If they wait the full 21 days, there will only be a few more days until the election. Let us see the effects of Conservative governance during a pandemic, BEFORE the election. The press never mentioned it, but the reason the Governor used the 1945 law was because conservatives WOULDN'T work with her because they don't believe there is anything to be done.

But they sure did hammer her over her nursing home decision. See how conservatives will Shirk(ey) responsibility?

<<<“We’re moving now from an era or a time when the focus was on mandating, dictating and frankly in some cases threatening, to more of an informing and inspiring and encouraging and loving and trusting people to do the right thing” approach, he said.

Asked about COVID outbreaks, Shirkey said "freedom is messy."

The virus ultimately was going to win, it was just going to take a longer time.">>>>

And when deaths in those same nursing homes and others start climbing without an executive order? We MUST push on!!

And the press won't have a critical thing to say about it. Get used to it.

Herd mentality
Sun, 10/04/2020 - 4:39pm

Or is it immunity?

MADISON - State Rep. Barbara Dittrich of Oconomowoc last week told her constituents there was no longer a danger of COVID-19 causing a large number of deaths. The same day, the U.S. lost its 200,000th person to the virus.

Days later, state Sen. Howard Marklein told his southwestern Wisconsin constituents that hospitals were not overrun and there was no correlation between a rising number of infections and hospitalizations or deaths. That day, a hospital in northeastern Wisconsin had to treat people in hallways because it was so overwhelmed with COVID-19 patients.

"If these legislators were practicing medicine, they would be sued for malpractice," Patrick Remington, a former Centers for Disease Control epidemiologist and director of the Preventive Medicine Residency Program at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, said after reviewing the lawmakers' statements...

"There is a correlation," Cowles, R-Green Bay, said of the rising hospitalizations in Wisconsin. "Precisely the correlation? We don't know. But there's no doubt that things have gotten worse."

When asked what source Marklein used as a basis to say there's no correlation between increasing coronavirus cases and deaths and hospitalizations, spokeswoman Kate Prange said it was Marklein's opinion.<<<<( see what I did there?)

Sen. Chris Kapenga, R-Delafield
"There is not a scientific consensus that using face coverings have been proven to stop the spread of COVID. In the place of evidence, face masks have become a politicized mental placebo,"

Rep. Scott Allen, R-Waukesha, said the same day: "Data is in: masks either hurt or do not seem to make a difference." Allen tested positive for COVID-19 five days later.
------------------------------------------------------------------

Nope! It's a herd mentality defined by opinions!!!! And like Covid...........It's taking over America!!!

Erwin Haas
Mon, 10/05/2020 - 7:55am

One of our kids lives in Georgia and was aghast when Gov. Kemp stopped enforcing the whole public health hoax. Schools and businesses opened, no masks, do what you need to do, you're not in a police state. Our son predicted mass disaster, everyone would sicken, the hospitals would be overrun and "that fool Kemp would be impeached, or something."
6 weeks later, calm. The new cases and deaths continue to fall, our grand kids go to school and our son and wife work daily.
Reporters, all working for corporate interests and continuing to push the C19 propaganda-should just shut up.

Matt
Mon, 10/05/2020 - 10:59am

So without the Gov taking emergency powers Dem's think their fellow citizens are too dumb to make a reasoned decesion? Maybe we'll all be better off moving this away from the political areana to something akin to wearing a bike helmit or allowing a business to decide what to require? It's amazing how big a snit leftists like Nessel and Whitmer have and what contortions they seek to avoid losing power to the citizens.

mw
Mon, 10/05/2020 - 2:07pm

We wouldn't need an executive order if people would stop being so stubborn and just wear the damn mask. The best science today says masks and social distancing can reduce the spread but thanks to people like Trump, that science has been politicized and questioned by the right.

mw
Mon, 10/05/2020 - 3:17pm

Along that same point, why should it be illegal to drink and drive? More people die from the common flu than from drunk driving, it's time to open the highways up! Plus how many of those killed by drunk drivers had preexisting conditions anyway. We should also do away with the speed limit and other traffic laws and let people make their own reasoned decisions when it comes to driving. Or does the tyrannical government not trust people to make these decisions on their own?

A.R.Eynon
Mon, 10/05/2020 - 4:56pm

I've heard a great deal of this line of reasoning from Republicans, who certainly make a huge "leftist" turn when the topic is a woman's right to control her own body. I simply note that being consistent in one's arguments would provide additional credibility. It'll be interesting to see what happens when the right's first choice for the USSC applies the Catholic Church's "right to life arises at conception" theory to IVF, IUDs, etc.

Trevieze
Mon, 10/05/2020 - 11:13am

Well, no more shopping in Ingham county. Ther are too many tiny tyrants there. What does no basis in Michigan law mean to these communists? Apparently, not much. Oh, and all you millennials and fruit cakes out there. You stay out of my life and I'll stay out of yours.

Todd Priest
Mon, 10/05/2020 - 12:40pm

I doubt that this virus even meets epidemic standards any longer but this isn't what matter. What matters is control. What a shame that these elected officials screwed over thousands if not millions of people in this state all in the name of control. It's shameful.

Todd
Mon, 10/05/2020 - 12:42pm

I also won't be visiting or doing business in Oakland or Ingham County.