Senate panel passes bills to try 17-year-olds as juveniles in crimes

Senate panel

The Senate Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety on Thursday approved a series of bipartisan bills to raise the juvenile age from 17 to 18. Next, they’ll go to the Senate floor for a vote. (Bridge photo by Riley Beggin)

Update: Score one for bipartisanship: Michigan Dems, GOP pass ‘raise the age’ bills

Michigan is one of only four states that automatically treat 17-year-olds as adults in the criminal justice system. 

That would change under bipartisan bills that passed out of Senate committee Thursday morning and which are likely to be supported in both houses of the Legislature for the first time in years. The package would “raise the age” of which criminal defendants are considered adult from 17 to 18, bringing Michigan in line with most other states. 

“A child can make a mistake,” Senate Judiciary and Public Safety Committee chairman Peter Lucido, R-Shelby Township, told Bridge Thursday morning. “The services are available at 17 in the juvenile justice system. They are not in the adult system because it’s punitive in nature in the adult system, not corrective.”

Lucido said if the legislation passes, it is likely to reduce recidivism and, eventually, the amount the state spends on prisons. 

The legislation would: 

  • Make 17-year-olds charged with crimes go through family court rather than adult criminal court, allowing for more opportunities for alternative resolutions, such as monitoring and counseling and circumventing the traditional court process
  • Prevent 17-year-olds from being housed in the same cell as adults
  • Allow prosecutors to try people under age 17 as adults for certain violent offenses such as rape or murder with court approval
  • Not apply to 17-year-olds that have already been tried as adults (it wouldn’t be retroactive)
  • Take effect Oct. 1, 2021

The Michigan League for Public Policy says that teens’ developing brains mean they’re more amenable to the kinds of rehabilitation programs exclusively offered in juvenile justice systems. Seventeen-year-olds prosecuted as adults are 34 percent more likely to re-offend and earn 40 percent less over their lifetime than their counterparts in the juvenile court system. 

About a third of juvenile cases in Michigan are diverted, which means they never actually enter the court system and the charge doesn’t follow them when they become an adult, according to a report by Human Impact Partners, a California-based research organization that advocates for social justice and public health issues. Instead, juvenile offenders may go to counseling, do community service or pay restitution to their victims. For those who are sent to juvenile detention centers, more rehabilitative and educational services are usually available than in adult prisons.

One change from previous versions of the legislation is the removal of a provision that would bar juvenile inmates from being housed in adult jails or prisons; the current bills simply require they not be housed in the same cell or transported in the same vehicles. Lawmakers and advocates have said it may be considered in future legislation, but that was divisive enough to hamper the current package’s chances.

The new bills (first introduced in the House) reflect a compromise after months of negotiations over the funding mechanism for housing and caring for 17-year-olds who would now be considered juveniles. Under the current proposal, the state will pay for 17-year-olds in the system for three years, when the funding method will be re-evaluated. The Senate version of the package — which will mirror the House version approved Thursday — is up for a hearing in the House Judiciary Committee on Tuesday. 

A different version of the proposals cleared a major hurdle earlier this year when they passed on the full Senate floor after years of the upper chamber shooting it down, indicating the new package is likely to find similar support. Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel’s office said Thursday they also supported the package. 

“In the Capitol, the wind blows all different directions,” Lucido said. But “ultimately, we’re on the same page. Let’s get this done.”

Dramatic developments in the state budget process have left strained relations between Democratic Gov. Gretchen Whitmer and Republican leaders in the House and Senate. In the wake of those divisive negotiations, spokespeople for the GOP caucuses in the House and Senate noted the Raise the Age package was among the criminal justice issues discussed in the first meeting between the warring factions after the budget was signed. 

“The goal is to find the policy items that the people in that room could come together on and put some energy into and find areas for compromise and agreement versus focusing on areas where they have great disparity of opinion right now,” Amber McCann, spokeswoman for Sen. Mike Shirkey, told Bridge Magazine last week. 

If the law passes, it would leave just Georgia, Wisconsin and Texas as states that view 17-year-olds as adults in the eyes of the law.

Facts matter. Trust matters. Journalism matters.

If you learned something from the story you're reading please consider supporting our work. Your donation allows us to keep our Michigan-focused reporting and analysis free and accessible to all. All donations are voluntary, but for as little as $1 you can become a member of Bridge Club and support freedom of the press in Michigan during a crucial election year.

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Donate now

Comment Form

Add new comment

Dear Reader: We value your thoughts and criticism on the articles, but insist on civility. Criticizing comments or ideas is welcome, but Bridge won’t tolerate comments that are false or defamatory or that demean, personally attack, spread hate or harmful stereotypes. Violating these standards could result in a ban.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.


Scott Brodie
Fri, 10/18/2019 - 5:15pm

Watch how fast the Legislature changes it's mind when a 17 year old Nathaniel Abraham type kills a young white person.

Amber Brashier
Sun, 03/29/2020 - 9:32pm

The issue of putting minors in adult prisons impacts not only the future of that child, but also the future of our society. As Riley Beggin (2019) quotes The Michigan League for Public Policy, “teens’ developing brains means they’re more amenable to the kinds of rehabilitation programs exclusively offered in juvenile justice systems”. Though I strongly support raising the age of defendants being considered adults to eighteen versus the current age of seventeen, the issue is not fully resolved. This bill still allows prosecutors to try minors as adult if they are charged with violent crimes.

According to The National Juvenile Defender Center, or NJDC, a discretionary waiver can still be used for minors ages fourteen and older who have committed a felony to move them to the adult courts. If we are taking the step to remove seventeen-year-olds from sharing cells with adults, we shouldn’t be allowing fourteen-year-olds into that environment just because they committed a violent crime. Their minds are still mendable and, when given a proper environment, can lean away from the impulse driven mindset of their current stage of development and grow into promising adults who may rejoin society.

To put those under eighteen years of age into adult prisons increases not only their risk of physical and sexual assault from adult inmates, but also increases their risk of suicide. According to the National Inmate Survey which was conducted by the Department of Justice, juveniles housed in adult prisons are 36 times more likely to commit suicide. We as a nation no longer sentence minors to death per the Supreme Court, but that is what we are doing by allowing our youth in adult prisons.