We hope you enjoyed your stay at the county jail. Here’s your bill.

With more than 43,000 prison inmates, Michigan advocates on the right and left are joining forces this fall to find ways to reduce the state’s crowded, expensive prison population. 

The website for Newaygo County Jail, north of Grand Rapids, is upfront about what it expects from inmates. They will be billed when they leave – $30 a day for housing and charged for medical care, haircuts, personal care kits and other items.

And if they fail to pay after they leave jail, it warns, that “will cause the expenses to be referred to a Collection Agency who will take whatever course of action they deem necessary to collect including legal action.”

It further warns that failure to pay could damage an inmate's credit rating for seven years.

Other Michigan counties have similar policies; Macomb County bills convicted jail inmates $45 a day. From 2011 through 2015, the county collected nearly $1.2 million in inmate housing fees. That means an inmate serving a six-month sentence could leave with a bill for more than $8,000. It also turns over delinquent accounts to a collection agency.

“It's a good program,” said Macomb County Sheriff Tony Wickersham. “We still need to hold (inmates) accountable. Those individuals who are sentenced to the county jail have to pay their fair share.”

Critics disagree.

Lauren-Brooke Eisen, senior counsel for the Brennan Center for Justice, a New York-based nonpartisan policy institute, asserts these charges impose unfair burdens on a population that is mostly poor and undereducated – and only make it more likely ex-offenders will return to jail. Eisen authored a 2015 report on the issue, “Charging Inmates Perpetuates Mass Incarceration.”

Moreover, Eisen said, housing fees typically cost as much to collect as counties actually take in.

Take Macomb’s five-year $1.2 million take. Macomb County Sheriff Wickersham conceded in a 2015 BBC News article the county's program was costing nearly as much to administer as it collected. In 2015, according to an annual report, the county brought in just over $250,000 in inmate housing fees.

Subtract from that an estimated $150,000 in annual salaries and benefits for two employees paid to run the program, Wickersham told Bridge. The county also pays collection agencies to pressure inmates to pay their bills. Wickersham said he was unaware how much their annual reimbursement might be. That information was not available in the county's budget.

But beyond financial costs, Eisen said, it is simply counterproductive to load debt on a population that will have a hard time as it is reintegrating into society after they leave jail.

“There are a million collateral consequences. It can affect whether you can buy a car or rent an apartment. The last thing we should be doing is putting up barriers to getting back into society,” she said.

“You are criminalizing poverty, is what you are doing.”

Empty pockets, few prospects

A 2002 profile of U.S. jail inmates by the Bureau of Justice Statistics found that 86 percent of jail inmates had a high school degree or less – with 12 percent holding an eighth grade education or less. Over half grew up in a single-parent household or with a guardian, such as grandparents or another relative, or a non-relative.

About a fifth had no income before they entered jail and 14 percent reported they had been homeless or living in a shelter some time in the year before they were incarcerated. Of those who were working, most earned less than $24,000 a year.

A bad credit rating from missed payments on a jail housing bill could make that much tougher after incarceration. A 2013 survey found that one in 10 Americans were denied jobs due to bad credit, even for entry-level, low-paying positions.

A former Ottawa County resident named Brad – he asked that his real name not be used – was incarcerated in Ottawa County Jail in 2006 at age 17 for larceny in a building, a felony. When he departed 255 days later, he recalled, he was given 30 days to sign up for a payment plan on a bill of about $6,500. Ottawa County charges even more – $50 a day – for convicted inmates, so that was half what his bill could have been.

“I didn't have any income, the kind of steady employment, where I could afford the payment plan,” he said, opting at the time not to sign up.

Not long after, he said, he got a bill in the mail for just under $13,000. He said it was an amount his parents simply could not afford.

“It was a shocker,” he said.

Brad incurred a second bill in 2008, when he was jailed for 25 days for attempting to buy alcohol as a minor. That added another $1,250 to his bill. He learned his case had been turned over to a collection agency. He said he got phone calls at home, pressuring him to pay, even after he moved to Grand Rapids.

Then one day in 2011, he got a knock on a door. It was a summons to appear in court.

With the help of an attorney from Legal Aid of Western Michigan, Brad settled the case with Ottawa County in 2012 for $3,500. He got the sum from a family friend, whom he is now repaying.

But Brad, now 28 and supporting himself with a job in the hospitality industry, said the burden of that bill held him back from applying for a loan to buy a car and even applying for a new apartment.

“When people see your credit history, see you owe $14,000 to the county. They wonder, 'What's that about?'”

“It's a constant fear and stress that someone is going to come looking for you,” he said.

His lawyer, Karen Tjapkes, said his case is an apt example of the burden these bills put on ex-offenders.

“These guys are trying to get their lives on track and then a couple years later they are hit with this civil lawsuit to collect the fees. I don't think it's appropriate to do that to these individuals who are trying to get on with their lives and become productive citizens.”

According to research by the U.S. Department of Justice, Michigan became the first state to institute a correctional fee when it enacted legislation in 1846 authorizing counties to charge inmates for medical care.

But wasn't until the mid-1980s that states began to authorize daily housing fees for jails. In 1984, Michigan legislators approved a measure authorizing counties to charge inmates up to $60 a day for housing and to file civil suits to retrieve the money. By 2004, an estimated one-third of county jails in the United States were charging daily housing fees. Michigan has no statewide database on how many counties impose such fees.

In addition, all Michigan jail inmates are assessed a $12 fee at the time they are booked into jail. They face another $100 fee if they haven't paid it by discharge.

In 2015, ACLU of Ohio highlighted the impact of pay-to-stay housing fees on poor inmates in jails across the state. It cited numerous cases of ex-inmates who struggled after their release with housing bills up to $20,000 or more.

“Imagine that day you spent in jail also resulted in losing your job, and your sole source of income,” the report stated.

“If you fail to pay the fee when you are released, it may end up on your credit report. When you apply for a new job they may do a credit check and you could be denied employment. Desperate, you turn to illegal means to provide for your children. If you engage in this illegal behavior and are caught, you will face more fines, fees, and jail time,” the report’s authors wrote.

“(Inmates) are given every opportunity to work. The ones who are getting a bill are the ones who choose not to do that.” – Michelle Young, undersheriff, Kent County

ACLU of Michigan has also fought a parallel practice dubbed “pay or stay” in which poor defendants are jailed for failing for to pay court fines or fees, often for minor crimes. In a 2010 national report on what it termed “The Rise of America's New Debtors' Prisons, the ACLU cited courts in Michigan that routinely turn to court costs and fees for court-ordered attorneys as a means to boost revenue for the court.

That practice came under rising scrutiny following the 2014 death of Macomb County resident David Stojcevski, who died in jail from apparent drug withdrawal 17 days into a 30-day sentence. He was jailed for failing to pay a $772 fine for missing a court appearance on a careless driving charge.

In May, the Michigan Supreme Court instructed Michigan courts not to jail indigent defendants simply because they cannot afford to pay fees or fines.

Shelli Weisberg of ACLU Michigan said it's “the same problem” as imposing housing bills on inmates after they exit jail, and that she is concerned these fines and fees may continue despite the Supreme Court's guidelines.

“Court rules are just that. Not everyone follows them,” Weisberg said. “We need to make people aware just how far afield the practice of pay or stay has gone.”

Asserting offender responsibility

But in Ottawa County, jail administrator Capt. Steve Baar defended the jail's $50-a-day housing charge, saying it has broad support from the public. Baar said the county's been charging inmates a housing fee about 30 years.

“When we have groups of people on tours of the jail, it's a common question. More often than not, the reaction is that a person convicted of a crime should have some responsibility to pay for room and board,” Baar said.

He was unable to provide a breakdown on how much the county collects in housing fees each year or how much it costs to run the program.

Baar added that jail officials work with inmates to devise reasonable payment plans. Even so, he said the county collects less than 10 percent of assessed fees.

Baar rejected the premise that imposing housing charges on inmates makes it more likely they will return to jail.

“We don't issue arrest warrants for that. I don't think that's a reason they will be more likely to end up in jail. To me, that's an excuse.”

Kent County imposes a $21 daily housing charge. But according to Undersheriff Michelle Young, it exempts inmates who perform a variety of work details, as well as those who take part in self-improvement and educational programs offered by the jail.

“I believe it's a fair program,” Young said. “They are given every opportunity to work. The ones who are getting a bill are the ones who choose not to do that.”

Young also views the housing charges as a necessary tool to induce inmates to do the variety of work tasks needed at the jail.

“I need people in the kitchen every day. What is going to inspire an inmate to do that work?”

Kalamazoo County has no inmate housing fee. But in 2012, Sheriff Richard Fuller said, he was asked by county commissioners to look into instituting one. He came up with a proposed $10 daily charge, with an annual cap of $500. He viewed the more modest amount as a means of delivering a message of responsibility to inmates without damaging their chances at reintegration.

Fuller said he has serious reservations about anything more onerous.

“You have to ask yourself, 'What are you trying to accomplish?'” he said.

Eventually, Fuller said, commissioners decided not to pursue any housing charge. He wasn't disappointed.

Fuller said he is “very sympathetic” to the concern that steep housing fees can make it harder for an inmate to construct a productive life after jail.

“For the people who are going through our system and our jail, we should not be impeding them getting back in the flow of society.”

Facts matter. Trust matters. Journalism matters.

If you learned something from the story you're reading please consider supporting our work. Your donation allows us to keep our Michigan-focused reporting and analysis free and accessible to all. All donations are voluntary, but for as little as $1 you can become a member of Bridge Club and support freedom of the press in Michigan during a crucial election year.

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Donate now

Comment Form

Add new comment

Dear Reader: We value your thoughts and criticism on the articles, but insist on civility. Criticizing comments or ideas is welcome, but Bridge won’t tolerate comments that are false or defamatory or that demean, personally attack, spread hate or harmful stereotypes. Violating these standards could result in a ban.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.


Mad Dog
Tue, 12/13/2016 - 9:45am
Don't forget the other extras like pretrial release on tether, drug and alcohol testing fees and work release fees. Transport fees from other counties or states can be lucrative. Talk about a captive market.
Brian Johanson
Tue, 12/13/2016 - 9:59am
Thanks for the eye-opening journalism. I was unaware that this was common practice. It sure seems like we are not making an effort to rehabilitate our citizens. Standing on your neighbors chest while trying to help him up is nonsensical. How does imposing a fee increase the success rate of the person who is leaving jail and trying to get back on there feet? Sheriff Wickersham's remarks make me wonder if he has a heart and if he is that out of touch with the citizens that he serves.
Tue, 12/13/2016 - 2:18pm
Great comment Brian. I agree. I find the Michigan, State Government is punitive to say the least to the point of heartless. If Michigan citizens paid close attention to what is going in some of our major institutions (prisons, schools, Flint water) their eyes would be opened.
Stephen C Brown
Tue, 12/13/2016 - 10:40am
Always a bad idea to allow the Justice system to make money. It's not a business, and always leads to abuse. Even the Transit police in NYC started making false arrests when they were "incentivized" by quotas and cash rewards. The worst offense now is the seizure laws, which are being abused regularly by Law Enforcement, the Courts, and Private Prison systems. NYTimes today published an investigative report on how a DA in Dothan AL diverted money from a Pre-trail diversion program, and uses it to abuse his office. Is this justice?
Barbara Dennis
Tue, 12/13/2016 - 11:13am
While I agree we need to find a solution to address cost. This is not the way to proceed and there needs to be addtional efforts focused on rehabilitation. It's hard to get a job out here even for a college graduate. BY placing this on an individuals credit report if unable to pay not good. You are setting them up for failure or did you not know a lot of employers check you credit report which is used as a character reference?
Tue, 12/13/2016 - 2:38pm
Why not rename jail as "Debtors in Making" facilities. Hopefully those found Not Guilty have their debt "forgiven"
Tue, 12/13/2016 - 4:26pm
In learned in high school civics class that one reason for the American revolution was to rid us of the offensive and repressive system of debtors prisons instituted here by the English crown I was consequently shocked to learn a large debtors prison had been built in Port Huron about 2006 Indeed what we are seeing is the criminalization of poverty Yes, I was told persons were put in jail for not paying their bills Does someone know more about this?
Tue, 12/13/2016 - 4:55pm
Perhaps not bring any action that creates the need to 'check-in' to such county facilities would be more fair and just and right. Quit whining about inmates and their choices.
Kevin Grand
Wed, 12/14/2016 - 5:25am
I'm sensing an interesting pattern here. When people disregard numerous notices to appear and fail to contact the Court regarding pending charges, we shouldn't have "pay or stay" policies because those are bad. When people commit crimes and are sentenced to jail, sending the people who committed the crime the bill for their stay (and not burdening the Taxpayer who didn't commit the actual crime), is bad. Lawyers (with apparently way too much free time on their hands) who feel that killers should be let out of jail simply because of their age at the time that they took a life, because to not do so would also be bad. My take away from articles like this is that we are handling the penal system all wrong. The gist that I'm getting from these people is that after you are convicted of a crime, you should be put up at a 5-Star Resort with all of the amenities included just so that we can ease the troubled consciences of the people at the ACLU, Brennan Center, etc. I mean, it's not as if the local Taxpayers would mind at all chipping in a little extra coin, instead of having that money go towards things like roads, schools, infrastructure, etc. There is one point that I can say that I did find informative from Mr. Roelofs; I was unaware that Sheriff Wickersham's program was just breaking even (I don't recall it ever being brought up at a BoC Meeting). Something to remember whenever the denizens atop the Taj Macomb want to hit up Macomb County Taxpayers for yet another tax hike.
Mon, 04/24/2017 - 12:56pm

Five star resort, this is laughable. People who see prisons as luxury are delusional.

Bill Zimmer
Fri, 12/16/2016 - 8:36am

Another aspect of the Michigan prison system is the privatization of services\'85 And the fact that these inmates who "work" improv in state penitentiaries often earn $.11 an hour for what they do. This does not adequately deal with the mountains of debt that people in this situation find themselves in. In fact, this creates a revolving door of profit for the owners while doing nothing to relieve the taxpayer burden of a system that locks people up for nonviolent crimes routinely, for things like marijuana. People who admit guilt and do their time should be given a second chance otherwise we are creating a culture of imprisonment for the underclass.

Fri, 12/16/2016 - 9:09am

There is at least one jail in Michigan owned by two judges, because the county couldn't afford to build one. Rumor is they receive a cut of the amount the inmates pay.

Fri, 12/16/2016 - 10:11am

Debtors prison. England did that. It was the basis of at least one of Charles Dickens stories. History repeats it's self again. If you are surprised about history and people in general, you have not read enough.

Sun, 12/18/2016 - 12:24pm

turns out if you in jail and you have a inherants coming to you after a family members dyes ,they courts/jail help thyself to that too. the system has fines up too $ 9000 for unemployed person .for working 10 hour a week. they have not yet fixed the computer that can only ask one question ARE you working...not how many hours do you work..to collect unemployment pay.the laws is you can earn $ 100 a week and still get you check?

Fri, 01/13/2017 - 11:31am

Maybe it will make people think twice about committing a crime.SOMEONE has to pay for these people while they are in jail.Joe Taxpayer gets to pay for their public defender and jail costs.Why?Joe Taxpayer didn't commit the crime.Taxpayers work their butts off,follow the law.Criminals just don't care.Time for them to wake up.The example of the guy who got presented with a bill that his parents couldn't afford to pay,then goes out,commits another crime,another fee,whining that his life is so hard,he can't pay it.He is stupid and selfish.If he hasn't learned anything after his first jailing,he can expect that he will be spending most of his time there.I don't have pity for people who get put in jail,after preying on others,and that they get a bill for it.They did the crime,they need to do the time,and pay their bill.Time to stop making the taxpayer fund snowflakes.

John Hutchinson
Wed, 01/18/2017 - 12:21am

The courts not the jailers should decide who and how much each inmate should pay! They are the only ones who are looking at each defendant independently! If courts charged rich inmates instead of letting them go or get little time because they can afford a high priced lawyer, more people would have confidence in our justice system.

Tue, 01/24/2017 - 9:17pm

The Kalamazoo and Kent advocated approaches seem fair: $10 per day with a $500 cap, or $21 per day if the inmate works or takes self-improvement classes. But some of the other fees cited are ridiculous. It reminds me of the scandalous fees charged for collect calls from jail back to the families that often enriched the jailers and left the families scrambling to keep their phones from being turned off. Maybe Macomb should reconsider their program if they collect so little money that they only break even?

Worried citizen
Thu, 11/08/2018 - 1:54pm

I think it is a monsterous thing to do to a person who is already being punished. If the state says that a person should be held in jail it is common sense they don't want to go so why charge them. It is illegal in this great country to have debters jail, if someone was desperate enough to turn to crime usually their lives are not doing well to begin with. This is another form of good old corruption in Michigan just like so many other things. I would love to see these people spend months in a place that gives you enough food to stay alive but not go to bed starving every night. If you do not have money for commessary you starve and freeze. Because Macomb county jail keeps the cold air blowing in the vents during the winter, and claims it is to prevent disease even though the temperature would have to be at the freezing point to prevent that. Dave that excuse for the uneducated fools they mistreat. The place takes inmates off of medicines they take as prescribed even non narcotic meds most of the time. And instead let's your physical and mental state decline to a base animal level as a good amount but not all the deputies treat people like dirt. Even though they are still human beings, kicking a man or women when they are down is just wrong no matter how you slice it. Please people don't just make uneducated judgments until you have been there has a inmate yourself for a minor charge that hurt nobody monetarily, mentally, or physically. Common sense does not exist in the eyes of the Macomb jail and most courts especially Warren.