What Flint lost

About a year ago, Victoria Marx lost her balance standing on a ladder while working at Home Depot. A couple of times. It was around that period that she noticed her right hand had started to quiver.

Last summer, Marx, 60, was diagnosed with Parkinson’s disease, a chronic movement disorder that can result from a mix of genetic and environmental factors. A few months later, Gov. Rick Snyder appeared on television to apologize to the people of Flint, confirming they were exposed to high levels of lead after the city began taking its drinking water from the Flint River in 2014.

A test in Marx’s bungalow last month showed her water is still unsafe to drink. It was the lead in that water that damaged her nervous system. Marx cannot prove it, but that is what she believes.

She no longer, however, believes what the governor has to say.

“This is something I have to live with for the rest of my life,” said Marx, who walks with a limp now. “Things would’ve been fine if Snyder’s emergency manager hadn’t switched us over to the Flint River.”

To be a resident in Flint these days is to thrum with a mistrust for government. Coping for months with no fix, enduring a mix of bad information and too little communication, residents interviewed in recent weeks say their faith in all levels of government has been shattered, replaced by suspicion and, at times, paranoia as the same government agencies implicated in the lead crisis are now in charge of the recovery effort.

Some residents say they don’t trust the water filters distributed at fire stations because of questions about high lead levels. Others balk at accepting donated jugs of water for cooking and bathing because some containers had no labels. A few won’t accept certain brands of free bottled water due to E.Coli contamination they heard about on Facebook. Still others reject the accuracy of blood and residential water tests conducted by government workers. Another blames the lead for the deaths of her two German shepherds.

This visceral mistrust has only strengthened with the revelation that county, state and federal health officials dithered internally for most of 2015 before alerting the public that the water may have also contributed to nine area deaths from Legionnaire’s disease.

People here say that, months after lead contamination was finally confirmed, they still aren’t getting answers as to why some residents still get rashes, or if their daily lives will return to normal by next year, the year after that, or ever.

At a recent NAACP meeting one resident referenced law enforcement killings of unarmed African Americans nationwide and voiced fear of National Guard workers distributing water in Flint, saying “If I open my door when they come, and take out my cell phone, they might shoot me because they think it’s a gun.”

Echoes of a dark chapter

The people of Flint speak of the cascading series of government failures in the language of betrayal. For many residents, a majority African American, the steady drip of disclosures echoes the most infamous chapter in the history of public U.S. health, prompting cries of, “remember Tuskegee.”

On Feb. 1, pastors from Flint and Detroit held a townhall meeting that included rap and business icon Russell Simmons and attorney Phaedra Parks, a cast member on the cable show, “The Real Housewives of Atlanta.”

Hundreds of people showed up. Ministers preached, local leaders spoke.

Several times speakers mentioned the Tuskegee experiment, the 40-year, federally funded experiment on 600 uneducated black men in Alabama, who were told by government doctors they were being treated for “bad blood.” In fact, most of the men had syphilis and were unwittingly being studied to see how the disease would affect their bodies if left untreated, even after a treatment (penicillin) became available. Dozens died.

As it happens, one objective of the Flint town hall was to introduce residents to doctors and lawyers they were told they could trust to address their health and legal problems, instead of having to rely on government agencies.

Benjamin Crump, civil rights lawyer and president of the National Bar Association, a predominantly African-American group, told the crowd that while they should get water and blood tested for free with local and state agencies, they should share and compare those results with tests conducted by their own lawyers and family doctors.

“How can the person who caused me pain be trusted to test...the level of my pain?” Crump asked of government officials. “This begs the question of independent testing.”

Frances Gilcreast, president of the Flint Branch NAACP, wrote an open letter to the city officials and Gov. Rick Snyder in February 2015, chastising the government for putting cost savings above water safety. Her sentiments echo through Flint a year later.

“If this were Grand Blanc, or Oakland County,” she wrote, “something would have been done immediately.”

Questions and doubts

Two blood testing sites that screened children for lead exposure over the past few weeks offered a festive atmosphere. Someone in a colorful monster costume danced the “Nae-Nae” with children. Face painters, snacks and balloon animals kept kids busy while parents poured over health questionnaires.

Parents asked about their children’s reaction to Flint’s water struggled to keep their emotions in check. Shavon Hamilton took deep breaths and looked off into the crowd, eyebrows furrowed. She had bottle-fed her infant daughter with tap water in 2014.

Kiara Settle let the tears well up. Her two-year-old son was tested once during a hospital visit and showed a lead level of 5.4 micrograms lead per deciliter of blood, indicating lead exposure. Her family had used the tap water during the first year after the switch to Flint river water.

“My baby was born in 2013,” said, Settle, 24. “They didn’t even give my baby a chance from the jump. I don’t care what they say about anything anymore. I’m trying to move.”

Residents said they want to trust results from the free water testing now being conducted by the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, but said the results can be confusing.

And, any way, they haven’t forgotten that MDEQ is the same agency that failed to correctly interpret the federal regulations on how to properly monitor and respond to the possibility of lead contamination in the water.

Kathleen Fridline was puzzled by the letter MDEQ sent to her elderly mother’s house. It said that her mom’s residential water test conducted in January showed a lead contamination level of 78 parts per billion. The “action” level is 15 ppb, the document stated.

But as she noted, the letter does not list the actions to take, other than to call the local health department with questions.

“What do we do now? Who do we wait to hear from? The city? DEQ? How do we address this,” Fridline wondered aloud while reading the results in her mother’s living room recently.

“I’d like to say I’m angry, but I’m just not an angry person. I’m concerned.”

Filters, bottled water questioned

Sometimes the information isn’t so much vague as contradictory, in the minds of some residents.
They note that local, state and federal officials have encouraged residents to use water filters, saying the filters will remove lead. But then they heard that EPA experts worried that the filters may not work if the lead coursing through a home’s pipes is higher than the filters can handle. Pregnant women and small children should use bottled water, the EPA said recently.

That’s the kind of contradictory information that fades residents’ trust.

“I don’t know what to believe,” said JaMise Wash-Lang who took her son, JaCarie, to Carriage Town Ministries in Flint to have his blood tested this month.

His teachers say the 5-year-old has not been behaving like himself; he’s been more hyperactive. JaCarie has a mild rash that won’t go away. The family has been using bottled water for months, but bathed the boy in the tap water before a water emergency was declared in January.

Wash-Lang says she became anxious after a Facebook post went viral showing a woman, supposedly in Flint, testing several brands of bottled water and getting high lead content readings.

She knows how conspiracy theories about tainted bottled water and an uncaring government sound. Paranoid. Crazy, even.

Until it’s your water. Your child.

“My main concern is the inconsistency of information, what to do, where to get help.” She hadn’t had her residential water tested, but was taken aback by the water sample containers distributed along with free bottled water at the fire departments. A questionnaire is attached to the plastic bottle with a rubber band.

“A rubber band?,” she said. “What if the rubber band comes off? How is that saying that they value the accuracy of the test?”

Shavon Hamilton wants to avoid confusing information about filters and bottled water altogether. She said she is considering buying a reverse osmosis system to filter impurities including lead from water at the point of entry into her house. The system Hamilton wants could cost more than $3,000, or about $70 per month if she chooses a payment plan.

“It’s going to be another bill I really don’t need. But I’m doing it. I’m really scared,” she said. “I don’t feel like a good mother because I’m just now doing this.”

Mary Smith lost her last shred of trust in city officials when she arrived home from dropping off her kids at school on a recent Thursday to find the water department shutting off her water. This was no ordinary shut off – workers drove up in a backhoe and dug several feet into the ground to reach the city pipe line.

At first, she thought, “They can keep their poison water.” Then, she thought about her three children and nephew who live in the house. How would they flush the toilet?

The city said that it hasn’t shut off any customer’s water for nonpayment since August. City officials said Smith’s water was shut off because she didn’t file documents to put the water bill in her name when she started the process to buy the house from the city in November.

The city’s actions infuriated Smith, who said she wondered why the city was taking time to shut off her water on what she considers a technicality than devoting all of its time to making drinking water safe.

“This is the same government that told us for a year and half that we could drink the water. Nobody trusts the government anymore, especially not after all this,” Smith said. “It’s going to be hard to get the people’s trust back.”

Bridge computer-assisted reporting specialist Mike Wilkinson contributed to this report.

Facts matter. Trust matters. Journalism matters.

If you learned something from the story you're reading please consider supporting our work. Your donation allows us to keep our Michigan-focused reporting and analysis free and accessible to all. All donations are voluntary, but for as little as $1 you can become a member of Bridge Club and support freedom of the press in Michigan during a crucial election year.

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Donate now

Comment Form

Add new comment

Dear Reader: We value your thoughts and criticism on the articles, but insist on civility. Criticizing comments or ideas is welcome, but Bridge won’t tolerate comments that are false or defamatory or that demean, personally attack, spread hate or harmful stereotypes. Violating these standards could result in a ban.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.


Tue, 02/16/2016 - 11:44am
Maybe a productive story for once vs. another story about Flint.--yes we get is and every other liberal bandwagon that continues to report on this. Ideas for solutions? Yes, it is heart-wrenching.
Tue, 02/16/2016 - 8:38pm
How in anyone's universe can this policy disaster be contrived as a "liberal bandwagon?" Perhaps if more liberals were to challenge the monopoly of power help by those whose folly created this, less human toll would have followed. Jeesh!
Sat, 03/12/2016 - 8:40am
This problem was caused by the liberal democrats that run the city of Flint. If they had done their job the governor would not have had to put an emergency manager on place.
Tue, 02/16/2016 - 12:44pm
I think the point of the article is to show why there is so much distrust from Flint residents in those they are supposed to count on to correct the mess and how deeply that distrust is seated in them. To be honest, if even distilled water was running out of their faucets, would the problem of trust still exist? I would suppose so. As in so many parts of life these days, this issue comes back to trust in others and how we improve that. Yes, from the outside we can try to enhance trust by doing and saying the right things, but the person who is distrustful is the person who has to make a change. Only that person can change himself to a trusting person. They have to seek out a means to prove to themselves something is worth trusting. That is a hard task for one to do in a life threatening situation, which this has been. We all need to understand and appreciate that. Some will never trust again - its as simple as that. And its the same distrust and anger we see displayed in the political debates and responses now re presidential campaigns. Different causes perhaps, but same fundamental response. Anger tells us something has to change - that's it purpose - a motivator. Distrust is not so different as we need to trust and go on. But this takes time for many of us to work through. Flint is a long term proposition. (And hopefully those in Detroit will heed its lessons re water security - hopefully the entire nation will as the many other areas struggling with the same issues have not gotten this kind of attention.) We might all have to give up a bit of our cheap throw away instant culture that is so fast paced to cover truly fundamental issues - food, water, shelter. Is that so awful? Do we need a cell phone that does everything under the sun for more than a hundred dollars a month when we could pay $0.25 a month for water security? We need to look at our own values - what counts the most - and make choices. They aren't easy - been there and done that - and they aren't the same for all people to be right for the individual making that choice. Some of those involved aren't ready to trust yet - they need their time. That's OK and we need to be respectful of that. Encourage forward movement, but respect their feelings. Trust is truly the bigger problem here. The same plasticity - adding of neurons in the brain - that means as autistic child can be remediated from autism's developmental problems is what will help Flint's children given the opportunities to have people work with them. Developmental delays means just that - delays in development - not inability to function at all ever - and I can say that with confidence as a Mom of a 21 year old pretty autistic child. But the bigger issue is trust - in our neighbors, in our leaders, in our country. But that comes from within each of us. So let's ask the residents of Flint to come up with a plan using resources we as a state can access what it is they would trust. If not their own county's resources, which county's resources? Can't we "load resources" between counties just as when one county loses assets in a disaster other counties contribute? We can only contribute what we have, but between us all, we have rather a lot... And if we can keep our emotional responses to a lower level, all of us, I think we will get to solutions and build trust faster. It was apparently distrust of emotional responses that allowed much of this to get rolling instead of truly studying the signs of the problem. Let's not spin our wheel on more of that as from what I can see, that sure hasn't been effective on any side.
Robert Goeckel
Tue, 02/16/2016 - 2:09pm
We have a very high level of lead and copper at our home. I have also developed some health issues in the last year. Not only is our water poisoned but our home is now worthless. All the years of effort to keep our residence nice and hopefully build some equity for retirement are down the drain literally. No one is addressing this part of the issue sufficiently. Flint homeowners properties are now worthless but I'm sure the assessed values with not be lowered. I bet NONE of the monies being provided will filter down to residents.
Yolanda Ashford
Tue, 02/16/2016 - 9:11pm
Kudos to Chastity Pratt for writting an article that gives great insight and a voice to those directly affected by Lead-gate...it undoubtedly offers a blueprint for politicians/those in charge to both STOP the political posturing and to START "strategically" helping, (and literally healing), the entire community! -This was definitely a worthy read! Y.H.A
Sun, 02/21/2016 - 2:19am
Years ago I was building a lot of decks made from CCA weatherproof lumber. When I went to my private doctor and told him I wanted to be tested, he informed me that they could not do any testing. That I would have to go to the EPA for any blood test. I just knew in my heart if they did find anything they would bury results, or just say ..all neg.
Sun, 02/21/2016 - 9:04am
Frances Gilcreast is a woman. You keep referring to her as 'he'.
Nancy Derringer
Sun, 02/21/2016 - 9:22am
Pam, thank you so much for the correction. I fixed it. -- Nancy Derringer, staff writer.
Sun, 02/21/2016 - 10:02am
Spot on, I sit in a lot of the meanings with those chunks of money to the same old same old went, consistently trying to ask Joe Public to in these meetings even school departments are talking about medicating children! Wake up people it's your lives, and I am reserving any opinions on what is speculation as to who might be appointed to positions in this city there may be another upwhirl we were promised change is what I'm hearing