Snyder’s reinvention plans for Detroit tied up in two ballot props

A local sports page reader, commenting on the lack of attention Miguel Cabrera’s Triple Crown bid was receiving nationally last week, lamented: “Detroit on the whole has been nationally defined in the cultural consciousness as the ashtray of the United States.”

Or it can be defined as tragically beautiful, according to the publicity for two new photography exhibits at the National Building Museum in Washington, D.C., that document Detroit’s ruins.

“Once America’s fourth-largest city, Detroit’s 138 square miles are now one-third empty land dotted with thousands of abandoned structures. Not just humble homes, but also grand architectural statements of prosperity and power have been reduced to vacant shells.”

But ruins that prompt both derision and awe have been decades in the unmaking. A photographer’s favorite, the old Packard plant on East Grand Boulevard, last produced an automobile 54 years ago.

The national narrative that Detroit is beyond saving has long been fueled by an attitude of benign neglect here in Michigan that has proven to be the easier path, politically, financially and culturally.

So when gubernatorial candidate Rick Snyder asserted repeatedly that the validity of Detroit was indeed central to Michigan’s future, there was plenty of head scratching, particularly in Republican audiences. Some at the time might have dismissed it as a feel-good line in support of his broader message that too much fighting for too long had led to Michigan’s own state of disrepair.

They were disabused of that notion quickly. After 10 weeks in office, Snyder announced his intention to proceed with one of the largest construction projects in the city’s history and refused to countenance what would be the largest Chapter 9 municipal bankruptcy filing in U.S. history.

Recasting Detroit as an indispensable economic asset is the basic strategy behind the New International Trade Crossing that will link Nova Scotia to Texas, as well as Public Act 4, the emergency finance law that allows for more forceful state intervention in local fiscal affairs.

Ballot test for Snyder plans

The NITC is the subject of Proposal 6 on the Nov. 6 ballot. Proposal 1 is a referendum on PA 4. The two Snyder policies challenge more than the entrenched economic interests seeking to stop them through petition drives. They also challenge the notion that the indifference those interests have relied on in preservation of the status quo can be in any way preferable to active change.

Snyder’s argument reiterates that the vitality of a state ultimately depends on the economic health of its largest metropolitan region. More importantly, it reminds a statewide audience that the residents of Detroit also are residents of Michigan.

The policies Snyder is asking voters to endorse, in fact, represent a defense of his Detroit constituents. From a Michigan Legislature that for years blocked the economic benefits of a new bridge. And from a municipal government so chronically underwater that it’s unable to provide essential services that suburban and outstate residents take for granted.

Polling has been mixed on Proposal 1. Despite millions in advertising by the owners of the Ambassador Bridge, voters remain on the fence regarding Proposal 6. In one sense, though, it may not matter.

Snyder and lawmakers retain the authority to craft a less intrusive financial emergency law that would still have more teeth than older versions. The Snyder administration would argue Michigan’s signed interlocal agreement with Canada requires no state financial involvement and precludes ballot action by voters, though the Moroun family would obviously contest that assertion in court.

But voter approval of Proposal 1 and rejection of Proposal 6 could provide necessary political backing for more: a long-stalled regional transit authority the Snyder administration supports, a transportation funding overhaul necessary to complement private-sector investment, and further state assistance to clear blight and build density.

One of Detroit’s ruins sits vacant on the east Detroit riverfront. More than a century ago, the Globe Building was a Great Lakes shipping maintenance center.

Last Saturday, Snyder announced the Natural Resources Trust Fund would provide the bulk of the $12.8 million to transform the shell into a recreation center. It will serve as an anchor to the Milliken State Park and the Dequindre Cut greenway that connects the riverfront to the Eastern Market, thus bolstering the neighborhood’s value for residential development.

In announcing the investment, Snyder saw the structure as something other than tragic beauty. According to the Detroit Free Press, he said: “I want everyone to remember what (the building) looks like today, so when we come back, we can see what the power of working together can do.”

Snyder said the reinvention of Detroit is part and parcel with the reinvention of Michigan. It's up to voters to decide if they agree.

Peter Luke was a Lansing correspondent for Booth Newspapers for nearly 25 years, writing a weekly column for most of that time with a concentration on budget, tax and economic development policy issues. He is a graduate of Central Michigan University.

Facts matter. Trust matters. Journalism matters.

If you learned something from the story you're reading please consider supporting our work. Your donation allows us to keep our Michigan-focused reporting and analysis free and accessible to all. All donations are voluntary, but for as little as $1 you can become a member of Bridge Club and support freedom of the press in Michigan during a crucial election year.

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Donate now

Comment Form

Add new comment

Dear Reader: We value your thoughts and criticism on the articles, but insist on civility. Criticizing comments or ideas is welcome, but Bridge won’t tolerate comments that are false or defamatory or that demean, personally attack, spread hate or harmful stereotypes. Violating these standards could result in a ban.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.


Thu, 10/11/2012 - 12:01pm
Peter, you forget Proposal 5, requiring a 2/3 majority in the Legislature to pass tax increases. That is almost fully funded by Manny "MORON" of the Ambassador bridge. He is trying to tap into anti-tax sentiment in order to block any possible funding initiative for a new bridge, though none is needed, in case Proposal 6 is defeated. I agree with the Governor, we need to revitalize Detroit. Vote YES on Proposal 1, NO on the rest, and lets get busy rebuilding Detroit, and Michigan!
Charles Richards
Thu, 10/11/2012 - 12:53pm
John Mogk, Wayne State law professor, wrote in the Detroit Free Press last April that, " Yes, suburban communities   are struggling today, but their struggles are widely understood to be a result of the restructuring of the auto industry, the troubled national economy and problems related to the mortgage foreclosure crisis. They’re not a result of the economic stress plaguing Detroit.    This understanding points to a sobering reality: It appears that at no time in the   past half-century has the future of the state or region actually been dependent on the future of Detroit." This undermines Mr. Luke's thesis about Governor Snyder's motivation. There is little reason to believe that the new bridge will bring much economic benefit to Detroit, except indirectly as a spillover from an improved Michigan economy. That said, I am in favor of reviving Detroit and building the bridge.