Bipartisanship registers a heartbeat

Finally. After months of struggle, Michigan’s state senate passed legislation last week to accept Washington’s offer to extend Medicaid to nearly half a million of our state’s working poor.

The vote was close – 20 to 18 -- and the run-up to it was complicated, intense and very partisan.  But when crunch time came, eight (out of 26) Republicans joined with all 12 Senate Democrats to ratify one of Gov. Rick Snyder’s main policy priorities.

At first glance, it looks as if the day was won by solid bipartisanship, fostered by a decision by the lawmakers to govern like adults. And that is true, up to a point -- at least when it comes to last week’s vote.

Those who argue the state has both a moral responsibility to 470,000 poor and uninsured Michiganders and a financial incentive to glom onto billions in federal support for expanded Medicaid should now give big pats on the back to at least four adults in the room, all Republicans: Gov. Rick Snyder, who persisted in fighting for this for months; House Speaker Jase Bolger, who constructed a similar bipartisan coalition in the House; Senate Majority Leader Randy Richardville, who worked hard to persuade a minority of fellow Republicans to go along; and Sen. Roger Kahn, a doctor from Saginaw, who led the work group that thrashed out the final compromise.

But underneath, the main political dynamics in Lansing remain much the same as they’ve been for the past two and a half years: An uneasy mixture of ideological Republican opposition to anything that smacks of support for President Obama, heightened by even more intense snarls from the Tea Party. That group is playing an outsize role in Michigan politics by threatening insufficiently intransigent GOP officeholders with primary election opposition from the right.

Senators opposed to Medicaid expansion cited concerns about increasing the size, cost and intrusiveness of the federal government.  Some questioned whether Michigan could really believe the feds would keep their end of the deal.

Others worried that future generations might be saddled with costs of another entitlement. However, I’m inclined to think these arguments are only semi-plausible smoke screens masking the real basis of opposition: Intensely hostile feelings toward President Obama and anything connected with his Administration, especially “Obamacare” – otherwise known as the Affordable Care Act.

Time after time, opponents railed that any – any – version of Medicaid expansion in Michigan reeked of the hated Obamacare, possibly because the folks it would add would otherwise be obliged to buy health insurance.  Sometimes I wonder if some Republican lawmakers would even vote against something called “Obamataxcut”!

One main factor in the difficult road to passage was opposition from vocal Tea Partiers like GOP chair wannabee Todd Courser, who threatened incumbent state senators with opposition in primary elections next year, adding the motive of self-preservation to ordinary partisan ideology.  Already, three sitting Republican senators representing normally Democratic districts are in the Tea Party’s cross hairs.  All are considered “toss-up” races by Inside Michigan Politics.

Nick Sundquist, an announced primary opponent of Sen. Geoff Hansen (R-Hart) demanded Hansen “explain his support for Obanacare-supporting legislation.” Sen. Tom Casperson (R-Escanaba) who cast the key vote for passage was called on the carpet for “Betrayal.” Meanwhile, former state rep Leon Drolet, once known for parking “Mr. Perks,” an enormous pink pig, in front of the Capitol, may go after Sen. Tory Rocca (R-Sterling Heights.)

There’s an added sub-plot going forward that will certainly crystallize concerns about opposition to Medicaid expansion.  After the expansion was approved, 14 GOP Senators voted against giving the bill “immediate effect”, i.e. instead of taking place on New Years’ Day, Michigan will have to wait until April. That’ll cost Michigan $7 million a day in money the feds otherwise would have made available to states to get people to sign up for Medicaid coverage.

That would mean $630 million down the drain. Taxpayers ought to encourage the senate to reconsider, pronto.

Besides, those same senators are not only in danger of being called sore losers, they are also at risk of being branded hypocrites.  As Brian Dickerson of thevDetroit Free Press noted last week, every one of the 18 GOP senators who voted against Medicaid expansion also voted two years ago for giving all but one of their ranks lifetime health care at taxpayer expense. (The exception, Patrick Colbeck of Canton, didn’t qualify because of a technicality.)

Michigan citizens deserve better.

Editor’s Note: Former newspaper publisher and University of Michigan Regent Phil Power is a longtime observer of Michigan politics and economics. He is also the founder and chairman of The Center for Michigan, a nonprofit, bipartisan centrist think-and-do tank, designed to cure Michigan’s dysfunctional political culture. He is also on the board of the Center’s Business Leaders for Early Education. The opinions expressed here are Power’s own and do not represent the official views of The Center. He welcomes your comments at

Facts matter. Trust matters. Journalism matters.

If you learned something from the story you're reading please consider supporting our work. Your donation allows us to keep our Michigan-focused reporting and analysis free and accessible to all. All donations are voluntary, but for as little as $1 you can become a member of Bridge Club and support freedom of the press in Michigan during a crucial election year.

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Donate now

Comment Form

Add new comment

Dear Reader: We value your thoughts and criticism on the articles, but insist on civility. Criticizing comments or ideas is welcome, but Bridge won’t tolerate comments that are false or defamatory or that demean, personally attack, spread hate or harmful stereotypes. Violating these standards could result in a ban.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.


Mike Ritenour
Tue, 09/03/2013 - 5:27pm
The Senate's repeat failure within the past few hours to give the medicaid expansion immediate effect underscores the "cut off our nose to spite our face" mean-spiritedness and hypocrisy rightly called out by Mr. Power. The Republican majority has deliberately denied Michigan sorely needed $600 million in aid on "ideological" (a word that gives them far too much credit for having a reasoned basis for their position) opposition to anything coming from or associated with President Obama. These latter-day Luddites need to get over it: the Affordable Care Act was passed by Congress, signed by the President, upheld by the Supreme Court, and partially implemented over the past three years. It is a fact, and it is not going away. The Michigan Senators can continue to make fools of themselves (as has the US House of Representatives in taking several dozen pointless, embarrassing repeal votes), or they can start acting in the best interests of the citizens of this state. For a change.
Javan Kienzle
Sun, 09/08/2013 - 8:37am
Mike hits the nail on the head when he says that “ideological” is a word that gives them far too much credit for having a reasoned basis for their position. They are predictably Pavlovian in their reaction to anything proposed by any Democrat or even any moderate; their opposition to anything coming from or associated with President Obama is a response that smacks of visceral hate. All to the detriment of the citizens of Michigan, including the constituents such legislators are supposed to represent. Their "thought" processes, as such, belong on a shelf in Harvard Medical School.