More pot and lower taxes if Michigan marijuana vote passes this fall (slideshow)

SLIDESHOW>>

Pot smokers in Michigan will be able to grow and keep more marijuana ‒ and pay less in taxes ‒ than users in most other states if Michigan votes in favor of recreational marijuana this fall.

Nine states and Washington D.C. have legalized recreational marijuana to some degree. Michigan will become the 10th if voters, as expected, approve the ballot measure in November.  

Each state handles regulation on its own terms. How does Michigan’s ballot initiative compare with laws across the country?

At a glance

Several restrictions in the Michigan initiative are staples of recreational pot regulations across the U.S.:

  • Buyers and sellers must be 21 or older
  • Driving under the influence is illegal, and
  • Giving somebody 21 or older marijuana as a gift is permitted.

Where Michigan breaks with the pack is quantity. With the exception of Maine, all the other states and D.C. limit personal possession to one ounce. Like Maine, Michigan would permit up to 2.5 ounces of flower possession.  

The impact of a high possession limit remains to be seen, as legal sales have not yet begun in Maine. Josh Hovey, spokesman of the Coalition to Regulate Marijuana Like Alcohol (CRMLA), the organization behind the Michigan initiative, told Bridge this limit was chosen to be consistent with Michigan’s limits for medical marijuana. Medical marijuana in Michigan limits personal possession at 2.5 ounces of flower and 5 grams of concentrates. “The legislature did a thorough job in creating a medical marijuana licensing system and...we wanted to make sure there wasn’t a lot of confusion.”

A marijuana glossary: Weed’s words, defined

It’s hard to understand the debate about recreational pot if you don’t understand key words. Here are terms you need to know to partake in the discussion:

  • Flower (n) - the portion of a cannabis plant that is harvested, dried, and ground from buds into a looser powder
  • Joint (n) - a cigarette filled with ground flower
  • Blunt (n) - ground flower wrapped in a tobacco leaf
  • Concentrate (n) - a cannabis product created by dissolving marijuana plants, creating a higher THC content than flower
  • Dabs (n) - concentrated cannabis that is inhaled after being spread on a hot surface
  • Dabbing (v) - smoking dabs
  • Edibles (n) - food products made with cannabis extract. Common foods include baked goods, but can also include beer, tea, and coffee.
  • Hemp (n) - a male marijuana plant whose fibers are harvested for non-consumable products, such as paper or fabric
  • Strain (n) - different species of cannabis plants, which can be purposefully cultivated to provide different experiences when consumed
  • THC (n) - abbreviation for tetrahydrocannabinol, the chemical in cannabis plants that produces the sensation of getting high
  • Vaping (v) - inhaling the smoke released from heating oils infused with marijuana or flower
  • Vaporizer (n) - the hand-held device used to heat cannabis oils so it can be consumed via vapor
 

And as with medical marijuana, recreational growers would be permitted to grow up to 12 cannabis plants, which is also the household limit.Other states limit individuals to 3 to 6 plants, though a household limit of 12 is more common.

Follow the money

The Michigan initiative asks consumers to pay far lower taxes than many  states ‒ a 10-percent excise tax compared with up to 37 percent elsewhere. 

Tax revenue from Michigan pot sales first goes to the state treasury to cover the cost of regulating and enforcing the law.

After that, $20 million a year for the next several years is slated for one or more U.S. FDA-approved clinical trials to research the effectiveness of marijuana to treat medical conditions of U.S. veterans and prevent veteran suicide.

Of the remaining tax money: 35 percent would go to K-12 education and 35 percent to the state Transportation Fund for infrastructure repairs and maintenance. The other 30 percent would be split among municipalities and counties with a marijuana business within in their boundaries.

A 10 percent excise tax, to be levied at consumer point of sale, is the main source of revenue generation. Hovey said the coalition aimed for a rate that was “middle of the road,” drawing in new state funding while reasonable enough to squeeze out illegal dealers.

Scott Greenlee, president of the anti-recreational marijuana group Healthy and Productive Michigan, disagrees that the tax rate is moderate, saying Michigan “has the lowest tax rate of any (state that has approved) recreational marijuana.”

Indeed, the 10 percent excise tax is among the lowest in the nation.

The gold medal for highest sin tax goes to Washington State, where marijuana brought in $315 million dollars in 2017 thanks to a 37 percent excise tax. Colorado, which also voted to legalize marijuana in 2012, taxes marijuana at 15 percent and made $247.4 million in the same timeframe. These rates are before any additional taxes, such as state or local sales taxes. According to the Washington Post, revenue collected in these states exceeded projections but still comprised “less than one percent of state budget expenditures.”

Greenlee voiced skepticism that the $200 million in revenue projected by advocates would have a notable impact in “a state that has budget of $55 billion….”

Hovey admits marijuana taxes “won’t fix all of our budget problems,” but insists “it will be significant.”

A chill change? Or the coming apocalypse?

The impact of legalizing marijuana ‒ negative or positive ‒ remains a bright green rorschach test. What you see depends on how you look at it.

Looking at the record in other states, neither the worst fears of critics nor the grandest promises of advocates have come to pass.

Advocates contend legalization will benefit minorities who are subject to disproportionate enforcement of drug laws by police. Redirecting money from dealers’ pockets to state coffers is another common refrain for pro-legalization groups. Pulling this money from the black market, they argue, also will make it easier for the state to fund schools, roads and other public services.

Healthy and Productive Michigan counters that “any revenue is outweighed by the societal costs” ‒ higher rates of workplace injuries and impaired driving accidents. Opponents also raise concerns that marijuana is a gateway drug (a contention in some dispute), with Greenlee arguing that “if you look at the people who do the harder drugs” almost every single one tried marijuana first.

As with most debates, reality seems to reside somewhere in the middle.

Marijuana taxes provide new funding, but not enough to solve all budget short falls. Usage rates for young adults in other states are up, but teens are smoking less in Colorado since that state legalized pot. And Washington state found no increase in drug abuse treatment since its law passed. States that legalized medical marijuana showed no overall increase in fatal accidents, and even a decrease in traffic deaths in some places (researchers theorize that giving patients access to medical marijuana may decrease alcohol consumption). Drug arrest rates also fall, but not equally for all demographics. Illegal drug markets may shrink, but do not melt away entirely.

The impact to date is perhaps best summed up by a 2016 study on recreational marijuana policy titled, “A Dose of Reality.” Researched by the Cato Institute, a free-market think tank, it found “little support for the stronger claims made by either opponents or advocates of legalization.”

Michigan’s future may be as hazy as Ann Arbor during Hash Bash, but it is likely one not one as extreme as either side espouses.

Like what you’re reading in Bridge? Please consider a donation to support our work!

We are a nonprofit Michigan news site focused on issues that impact all citizens. In an era of click bait and biased news, we focus on taking the time to learn both sides of a story before we post it. Bridge stories are always free, but our work costs money. If our journalism helps you understand and love Michigan more, please consider supporting our work. It takes just a moment to donate here.

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Donate now

Comment Form

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Comments

Uncle Mike
Thu, 06/28/2018 - 11:30pm

Don't argue the pros and cons here folks, get off your butts and VOTE!

Jamie Lowell
Fri, 10/19/2018 - 8:12am

Michigan does not “break from the pack” when it comes to possession limits as described. Bridge even includes that Maine has the same limit. As the most recent version of legalization, such limits and restrictions ought to evolve. Particularly, since there has been no reasons presented from the other legal states to keep or include other restrictions. In addition, the amounts are the same that the medical program created in 2008. There is hardly anything mentionable about it - except to demonstrate evolution in legalization programs- and it is most definitely not a sensational provision.

John Kroneck
Sun, 10/21/2018 - 1:09pm

Yes, it does depend on how you look at the data. For example, in Colorado overall traffic fatalities went down, the key word being overall. That is, at the same time that over all traffic fatalities are going down, marijuana related fatalities on the road were escalating. In Michigan there are over 200 organizations that have come out opposing legalization. Just as an example, Michigan Chamber of Commerce, Michigan builders and contractors Association, Michigan Chiefs of police, over 70 of Michigan Sheriffs have signed on to their opposition, Public Health Physicians have come out in opposition, Prosecuting Attorneys Association, the list goes on. There are just too many questions about the safety of our communities, our businesses, our families to support this proposal.

Mmmk
Wed, 11/14/2018 - 9:24am

No surprise chiefs of police and sheriffs oppose this. It lines their pockets with revenue and is used as an excuse to extort the public’s money. Alcohol prohibition never worked and neither will the war on marijuana. Wake up sheeple!

Nope
Wed, 11/14/2018 - 10:20am

This is ignorance. I agree with Mmmk. Also, why do prosecutors oppose it? Cause they get paid to criminalize it. Why do physicians oppose it? Because their in bed with pharmaceutical companies as competition. Besides what gives any human being the right to others bodies? Abortion is legal. Getting drunk after work is legal. The U.P. is full of drunks. Why doesn’t your “communities” worry about that? Why is there limits on “legal” marijuana but yet you can rent an entire beer truck, buy kegs and a 1000 bottles of scotch whisky if you so please? Body desecration is legal. This is the list that goes on and on, not yours. It’s more dangerous to smoke cigarettes and eat McDonald’s, what are doing about that? Move on from your Reefer Madness fears and have an open mind for once. I know a lot of people who are actually far MORE productive on marijuana, despite what the lies tell you. Most workplaces would actually BENEFIT from happy responsible smokers. Sure, maybe not a neurosurgeon but definitely a hospitality or tourism worker. If you’re against it, then be a person who doesn’t use it and keep it from your home. Do people like you all think with the same shared brain? Your intellect is like too little butter spread over too much bread.

John Lost
Wed, 11/14/2018 - 10:31am

Besides John you lost. The vote passed and you and all the other fear mongers will now have to learn to live with and make peace with it. You will NEVER keep it out of your community (not like it ever was before). It’s only moving from the shadows to the light, while you stay in the dark. Everyone around you (the free thinkers anyway) will grow it in their homes and legally drive to get it and freely pass by your house even if your “footloose” town decides to ban the dance of dispensaries.

Reality
Wed, 11/14/2018 - 10:50am

Yikes, even Oreo cookies in your community are more dangerous than marijuana in the hands of responsible adults. Just think of the msg’s, high fructose corn syrup and food dyes that infiltrate the diets in your town. Far more dangerous than a medicinal plant. Even school lunch programs are proven (like all the others I mentioned) to be more dangerous. Oh, and driving while high? The equivalent of driving on large amounts of chocolate, or being distracted by a landmark and scenery. Even being angry at someone while driving is far more deadly. The only cases I’ve ever heard of that involved a fatality and a high driver were irresponsible teenagers who are not and should not be using weed, alcohol or even cigarettes for that matter. Moreover, those don’t even come close to the fatalities caused by texting and driving for example. Ban smart phones now? Get over it. There are far more things to prioritize being worried about.

Reality
Wed, 11/14/2018 - 10:53am

Yikes, even Oreo cookies in your community are more dangerous than marijuana in the hands of responsible adults. Just think of the msg’s, high fructose corn syrup and food dyes that infiltrate the diets in your town. Far more dangerous than a medicinal plant. Even school lunch programs are proven (like all the others I mentioned) to be more dangerous. Oh, and driving while high? The equivalent of driving on large amounts of chocolate, or being distracted by a landmark and scenery. Even being angry at someone while driving is far more deadly. The only cases I’ve ever heard of that involved a fatality and a high driver were irresponsible teenagers who are not and should not be using weed, alcohol or even cigarettes for that matter. Those don’t even come close to the fatalities caused by texting and driving for example. Ban smart phones now? Get over it. There are far more things to prioritize being worried about.