Bridge Magazine's 2017 Academic State Champs
Bridge Magazine is proud to name 54 high schools as 2017 Academic State Champs. The schools listed below are best preparing students for success after graduation.
This year’s State Champs mark a dramatic departure from past years, when the award was based on how well public elementary, middle and high schools performed on state assessments, when adjusted for poverty. Because Michigan changed its assessment, Bridge is unable to compare multiple years of testing data.
So Bridge is instead looking into how public high schools, including charters, are preparing students for life after graduation. Are students “college-ready” in key subjects? Are they pursuing -- and getting -- a college degree or certificate?
We separate the ACS winners below into four categories, so they are compared with schools of similar poverty rates. Studies show income can be a key predictor of student success.
Click on a school to get more details
Most affluent high schools
Below are 21 high schools that best prepared students for success among the 134 in the state in which fewer than 25 percent of students were eligible for a free or reduced-priced lunch.
High schools with above-average incomes
Below are the 14 high schools that best prepared students for success among the 179 schools in the state in which between 25 percent to fewer than 40 percent of students were eligible for a free or reduced-priced lunch.
High schools with below average incomes
Below are the 10 high schools that best prepared students for success among the 166 schools in the state in which between 40 percent and fewer than 55 percent of students were eligible for a free or reduced-priced lunch.
Lowest-income high schools
Below are the nine high schools that best prepared students for success among the 141 schools in which more than 55 percent of students were eligible for a free or reduced-priced lunch.
How we narrowed down the list
For this report, Bridge considered three measures related to student success after high school:
College readiness: We looked at what percentage of a school’s high school juniors had done well enough on the ACT to be considered “college ready” in math, science, reading and English. The test was taken when the students were high school juniors.
Post-high school enrollment: This looked at what percentage of a school’s graduates enrolled in college or a certificate program within a year of graduation.
Post-high school progress: This measured what percentage of a school’s graduates had earned a certificate or degree or were still pursuing their higher education within four years after graduation.
We then grouped 620 high schools across the state, both traditional and charter, into four levels of student poverty, a key indicator of student success. In other words, we compared affluent schools with affluent schools, the poorest schools with their peers, and so on. We measured poverty by the percent of students at each school eligible for a free or reduced-priced lunch.
After breaking the schools into four income groups, we measured how each fared in the three measures of post-graduation success over several years. The schools that fared best in all three measures were named as Academic State Champs. Schools were rated from 1 to 10 in each measure, with 1 being the best.
Why some high schools were excluded
A number of schools could not be included for a variety of reasons. Some were too small to have reliable data (the state does not report information when there are fewer than 10 participating students) or did not have data for the three graduating classes we looked at (2009, 2010 and 2011).
High schools that take in students from multiple districts, such as the prestigious International Academy of Oakland County, were also not included.. The state does not supply aggregate numbers for those multi-district schools, and the data is only available for those students from each district that attend the multi-district schools (sixteen districts feed into the International Academy). With the state suppressing all data in which there were fewer than 10 students in a particular category (number of graduates, for instance), it made it impossible to create accurate aggregate totals for the multi-district schools.
See what new members are saying about why they donated to Bridge Michigan:
- “In order for this information to be accurate and unbiased it must be underwritten by its readers, not by special interests.” - Larry S.
- “Not many other media sources report on the topics Bridge does.” - Susan B.
- “Your journalism is outstanding and rare these days.” - Mark S.
If you want to ensure the future of nonpartisan, nonprofit Michigan journalism, please become a member today. You, too, will be asked why you donated and maybe we'll feature your quote next time!