Shirkey: Don’t cut Michigan schools budget despite $1.2 billion shortfall

Debilitating cuts to the Michigan schools will be pushed back until the next budget year, if Senate Majority Leader Mike Shirkey has his way. (Bridge file photo)

There should be no budget cuts for Michigan schools for the current school year ending in June, despite devastating losses in the school aid fund caused by the coronavirus pandemic, Senate Majority Leader Mike Shirkey told Bridge Monday.

“In my opinion, schools should not have any reduction in their budgets for this school year. None. Zero,” Shirkey said.

"I’m ready to roll my sleeves up and go to work to arm wrestle with the federal government," said Senate Majority Leader Mike Shirkey. (Courtesy photo)

Instead, the GOP leader said he will push federal officials to pony up the $1.2 billion shortfall. Democratic Gov. Gretchen Whitmer has similarly pleaded for more federal support for schools and other state services.

With Shirkey’s support for maintaining school budget levels, immediate cuts to K-12 schools are unlikely.

Shirkey’s stance is likely to be greeted with sighs of relief from school officials who had been bracing for devastating budget cuts.

But it’s likely only a temporary reprieve from the budget ax — schools face large cuts in the 2020-21 state budget caused by a projected $1.1 billion shortfall in the School Aid Fund next year. That budget must be approved by the Legislature and signed by the governor by Oct. 1.

Whitmer spokesperson Chelsea Lewis said in an emailed statement that the administration was “glad to hear that Sen. Shirkey agrees with the governor that we will need additional flexibility and support from the federal government. 

“We hope Sen. Shirkey will ask President Trump to pass the HEROES Act when he's in Michigan this week, which will provide our state with additional flexibility and support to avoid deep and painful cuts to schools, public safety, and health care."

A bipartisan consensus that Michigan schools should be protected as much as possible from the fiscal impact of the coronavirus shutdown was a rare moment of agreement between Shirkey and Whitmer, who have sparred in  the past month over the governor’s go-it-alone handling of her emergency powers. 

Shirkey told Bridge that schools shouldn’t suffer from actions that were forced on them because of the pandemic. 

“The executive order (issued by Whitmer closing school buildings) prohibited them from making any kind of budget adjustments,” Shirkey said. “And number two, basically every school employee since schools shut down have been working on COVID-related activities in support of families and businesses.

“It would be completely illegitimate to affect their budget [this] year,” Shirkey said.

“We know next year’s budget is going to have a different effect but we know that going in, and we have time to plan and we spread it out over 12 months,” Shirkey said. “But I’m ready to roll my sleeves up and go to work to arm wrestle with the federal government.

“I believe we have a really rational argument that most of the expenses schools endured since they were told to shut down have been directly related to COVID,” Shirkey said. “So we should be able to use the CARES Act for this particular process.”

Shirkey said he hopes to coordinate a “presentation” to federal officials with Whitmer that argues that school costs since the Mid-March closure are COVID-related and thus eligible for pandemic relief funding.

While both leaders are looking to federal relief, Shirkey and Whitmer are taking different approaches. 

Shirkey said he believes $3.9 billion the state has already received in pandemic relief funding from the federal CARES Act can be used to fill the $1.2 billion school budget shortfall this year. 

“We’ll say, ‘Here’s our rationale and tell us if we’re wrong. And if they push back, then we contact our congresspeople,” Shirkey said.

The Whitmer administration has said the CARES Act does not give the state enough flexibility to divert $1.2 billion to schools, which is why she has urged Congress to pass another relief bill to provide money specifically for schools. 

Shirkey said he will work to build consensus on his position in the state House and Senate.

In response to Shirkey’s announcement, State Superintendent Michael Rice said, “We’re supportive of any federal funding for this year and next year to protect educational services for children. Given the budget challenges in Michigan as a result of the pandemic, we’re counting on Congress to support our children.”

Scott Menzel, superintendent of Washtenaw Intermediate School District, was relieved to hear Shirkey’s support of no budget cuts in the current year.

“Given that we are nearly through the current school year and have continued to pay our employees, the commitment of the Senate Majority leader to avoid K-12 cuts for this year is reassuring,” Menzel said. “This is welcome news at a time where schools have increased levels of concern related to the potential of a negative supplemental in the current fiscal year.”

Robert McCann, executive director of the Tri-County Alliance for Public Education, a statewide education and advocacy group, said Shirkey’s position was “a good start.”

“We appreciate his commitment for this year, but we need the same commitment for next year’s budget,” McCann said, “Particularly at a time when school costs are going to go up rather than down because of [expected] new guidelines to operate schools safely.”

Facts matter. Trust matters. Journalism matters.

If you learned something from the story you're reading please consider supporting our work. Your donation allows us to keep our Michigan-focused reporting and analysis free and accessible to all. All donations are voluntary, but for as little as $1 you can become a member of Bridge Club and support freedom of the press in Michigan during a crucial election year.

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Donate now

Comment Form

Add new comment

Dear Reader: We value your thoughts and criticism on the articles, but insist on civility. Criticizing comments or ideas is welcome, but Bridge won’t tolerate comments that are false or defamatory or that demean, personally attack, spread hate or harmful stereotypes. Violating these standards could result in a ban.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.


Kevin Grand
Tue, 05/19/2020 - 7:22am

SML Shirkey needs to find each and every entitlement program Gov. Karen hold dear to her heart and zero out its budget.

That should make the school budget whole again.

Tue, 05/19/2020 - 8:07am

Does that make Shirkey a RINO?

Tue, 05/19/2020 - 8:08am

Please explain why the schools are short. Did the state spend so much money that it won't have funds to give to the schools? Did the schools spend so much on CVD stuff that they're now short? The Feds gave or are giving a pile of money to average folks (excluding small businesses) so relatively few saw any shortfall, (many are making more on unemployment than working!). Shouldn't sales taxes jump back when folks are let out to spend their money? Spending money in grocery stores verses restaurants is another reason to extend sales taxes to all purchases. Sounds like much of this shortfall was manufactured or self inflicted by state policies.

Tue, 05/19/2020 - 12:36pm

"Spending money in grocery stores verses restaurants is another reason to extend sales taxes to all purchases." Okay, dictator, then at least make it a progressive tax, only on nonessentials, like nasty animal products. Otherwise how would we be able to afford to eat or live?

Moscow Mitch
Tue, 05/19/2020 - 8:08am

Let them file for bankruptcy.

Shirkey approach
Tue, 05/19/2020 - 8:12am

I have always depended on the kindness of strangers.

Heart melting
Tue, 05/19/2020 - 8:15am

Shirk, your heart is in the right place, but Whitmer is right, again. This education funding is too important, as you point out, to leave to the whims of the GOP in DC or in Michigan.

Bobby Joe
Tue, 05/19/2020 - 4:18pm

Indeed, to continue the point made by 'Heart Melting', most major decisions are too important to be left to democratically elected leaders or to people who have other viewpoints than the Governor's. The 'whims' of those with different political views are not as important as the 'beliefs' of Democrats, and thus should be ignored. All power and decision making, as 'Heart Melting' and other Democrats have argued, should be centralized in one unelected leader who then can unify and lead the People (sometimes called in German the Volk). Look, it's all in the book Mein Kampf, and you can read about these beliefs and ideas if you want there.

Wed, 05/20/2020 - 8:34am

Are you taking Hydroxychloroquine? There are a lot of side effects that seem apparent in your post.

Tue, 05/19/2020 - 10:31am

Education should be the last place to cut the budget. But, I would agree that teachers with poor performance should go.... and students out of district should not be allowed the same benefits as those in district.

Tue, 05/19/2020 - 11:01am

That's just great. Alpena has worked their way out of near bankruptcy and pay cuts etc. 5 or six years ago they all took cuts . Finally after 5 years they aren't even back to the starting salaries of 5 years ago. They dropped to a $32,800 starting pay. How do we expect to replace teachers with these crazy salaries. I know they only work 9 months. Love to hear from you. R.L.

Bleeding heart
Wed, 05/20/2020 - 8:36am

You can't even get a mortgage for a doublewide with that!

Wed, 05/20/2020 - 8:41am

$32,800 a year in the Trump depression? No wonder folks from Alpena are moving back in droves. I work for food.

Diane Wolfenden
Tue, 05/19/2020 - 10:38pm

Help me understand why the Governor took steps to reduce State staff and take advantage of Federal unemployment funds, yet school employees continue to be maintained on payroll when none are working full time and there's a presume budget crisis. Why not let them collect part time unemployment. They may even end up making more money than the salaries many earn.
It appears education has less of a priority on the governor's radar. Very disappointing!!!