Skip to main content
Bridge Michigan
Michigan’s nonpartisan, nonprofit news source

Detroit is back. But for whom?

Detroit is the darling of the national media. But can its comeback benefit longtime residents?

That’s a defining question these days in Detroit, whose revival from bankruptcy just a few years ago is prompting difficult questions about whether the city’s rising tide can lift all.

To be sure, any talk about revitalization must acknowledge there’s still a long way to go.

Because while poverty has declined to 35.7 percent in 2016 and neighborhood services are improving, some say it’s difficult to argue that Detroit is gentrifying in any traditional sense –  an influx of new residents who descend into neighborhoods and price out longtime neighbors.

“If the definition of gentrification is that people are getting displaced because of a rise of taxes or property values, we’re not really seeing that anywhere,” said Sam Butler, executive director of Doing Development Differently in Metro Detroit (D4), a nonprofit that advocates for policies that protect long-term residents.

In some ways, voters weighed in on the debate last month, with the overwhelming re-election of Mayor Mike Duggan (who scoffs at talk of “Two Detroits”) over state Sen. Coleman A. Young III (whose campaign was based on the argument that city policies favor a prosperous few.)

Butler wants the discussion continue. His group, known as D4, led community conversations this fall about so-called equitable development –  requiring input from neighbors, local hiring and other benefits before the city grants subsidies to developments. More forums are planned early next year.

Done right, development downtown and Midtown should help all residents, Butler argued.

Eric Seymour contends the focus on the city’s core detracts attention and resources from neighborhoods.

Seymour, a researcher at Brown University, has studied Detroit for years. He argues that displacement in Detroit isn’t from gentrification, but tens of thousands of poor people losing their homes and apartments because of a housing crisis that is still unfolding. City leaders, he argued, are doing next to nothing to stop the hemorrhaging.

Bridge Magazine recently talked to both about Detroit and its future. Follow the links below for the conversations.

BUTLER: Detroit is booming. Let’s ensure the comeback benefits all.

SEYMOUR: What gentrification? Much of Detroit is getting worse.

How impactful was this article for you?

Only donate if we've informed you about important Michigan issues

See what new members are saying about why they donated to Bridge Michigan:

  • “In order for this information to be accurate and unbiased it must be underwritten by its readers, not by special interests.” - Larry S.
  • “Not many other media sources report on the topics Bridge does.” - Susan B.
  • “Your journalism is outstanding and rare these days.” - Mark S.

If you want to ensure the future of nonpartisan, nonprofit Michigan journalism, please become a member today. You, too, will be asked why you donated and maybe we'll feature your quote next time!

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Pay with PayPal Donate Now