Skip to main content
Bridge Michigan
Michigan’s nonpartisan, nonprofit news source

Journalism protects democracy

Trustworthy, nonpartisan local news like ours spurs growth, fosters relationships, and helps to ensure that everyone is informed. This is essential to a healthy democracy. Will you support the nonprofit, nonpartisan news that makes Michigan a better place this election year?

Make your tax-deductible contribution today.

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Pay with PayPal Donate

Federal government shutdown idles program that could help in Line 5 spill

A forecasting system that helps Great Lakes weather predictions and would aid in the response to a rupture of the Line 5 oil pipeline is among the casualties of the federal government’s partial shutdown.

Computers that feed information into the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Great Lakes Coastal Forecasting System have been off since late December, NOAA researchers say. That’s when parts of the federal government were shuttered amid a stalemate over President Donald Trump’s calls for a $5 billion wall along the southern border.

The forecasting system — a set of three-dimensional computer models — provides information on currents, water temperature, ice and waves in the Great Lakes. A specific model forecasts conditions in the Straits of Mackinac, the turbulent gateway between Lakes Michigan and Huron.

Related: The federal shutdown hit Sleeping Bear Dunes. So volunteers rushed in.
Related: Federal shutdown gets real in Beer City: Michigan summer ales in jeopardy​
Related: Six things to know about the federal government shutdown in Michigan​

That’s where a piece of Enbridge Energy’s Line 5 oil pipeline stretches along 4.5 miles of lakebed. It has never leaked in the Straits over 65-years of operation, but it has attracted widespread scrutiny in recent years after a different Enbridge pipeline spewed more than 1.2 million gallons of crude into the Kalamazoo River.

Eric Anderson, an oceanographer in NOAA’s Great Lakes Research Lab, built the forecasting model in 2012. He said it’s crucial for mapping where oil might travel in the Straits during a spill.

Researchers at University of Michigan and Michigan Technological University are among those who have used the model to map spill scenarios were Line 5 to rupture, an unlikely scenario that could prove catastrophic for the Great Lakes.  Worst case forecasts have varied. Michigan Tech, for instance, estimated a spill could reach as many as 437 miles of shoreline along Lakes Michigan and Huron.

The NOAA forecasting system would also prove handy after a spill, Anderson said. It would allow the agency to tell the Coast Guard where oil might travel days after an incident.

But that forecast will be out of commission until Washington decides to govern again.

Anderson said his lab is considered “non-essential,” during the Washington statemate, meaning he and his colleagues are furloughed — and their research is halted — until Trump and Congress reopen the government.

“That [forecasting] model is down,” Anderson told Bridge Magazine. “The day after Christmas, we had to go into the lab and we had to shut everything down.”

That means lake data isn’t feeding weather forecasts, worsening predictions of conditions such as lake-effect snow, Anderson said.

Some “essential” NOAA staffers would still work with the U.S. Coast Guard during a spill response, but they would lack up-to-date data to predict where oil would travel after the initial hours of a spill, Anderson said.

“That becomes all the difference between say, protecting Mackinac Island or protecting, you know, Wilderness State Park on the other side of the Straits (in the town of Carp Lake).”

Commander Shaun Edwards, who leads the Coast Guard’s response efforts in Sault Sainte Marie, told Bridge he was not aware that NOAA had turned off its data model in the Straits

The forecasting gap would not affect the Coast Guard’s response in the first few hours of a spill, Edwards said. With boats and oil skimmers in the water and planes overhead, his team would largely respond to “what we see.”

“It’s important that people understand we’d still be out there cleaning up and doing the response and all, based on what we’d see visually. We’d be actively removing oil from the water,” Edwards said.

But Edwards said the data pause might limit the Coast Guard’s ability to “[look] a few days ahead” to where oil might end up —  complicating decisions over where to place protective booms.

(Those Coast Guard responders are working without pay until the government opens.)  

Enbridge downplayed the significance of NOAA’s partial shutdown.

“In the unlikely event of an actual incident we would rely on real-time data. We would collect data through air sampling, overflights, field recon and weather monitoring to guide the response team in orchestrating an effective response,” Ryan Duffy, an Enbridge spokesman told Bridge.

“The fact that NOAA is temporarily shut down has almost no impact on an oil release response. Enbridge can easily replace the services it provides,” he added.

Line 5’s critics are pointing to the forecasting trouble to renew their calls to halt oil through the Straits.

“Without this critical information, a Line 5 pipeline rupture could be devastating.” Liz Kirkwood, executive director of For Love of Water, a nonprofit advocacy group, said Wednesday in response to an MLive report on the issue.  “As public trustees and defenders of our Great Lakes, the State of Michigan must take swift emergency action to protect our Great Lakes from a catastrophic oil spill by shutting down Line 5 oil operations until the federal shutdown is over.”

Michigan Environment Watch

Michigan Environment Watch examines how public policy, industry, and other factors interact with the state’s trove of natural resources.

Michigan Environment Watch is made possible by generous financial support from:

Our generous Environment Watch underwriters encourage Bridge Michigan readers to also support civic journalism by becoming Bridge members. Please consider joining today.

Only donate if we've informed you about important Michigan issues

See what new members are saying about why they donated to Bridge Michigan:

  • “In order for this information to be accurate and unbiased it must be underwritten by its readers, not by special interests.” - Larry S.
  • “Not many other media sources report on the topics Bridge does.” - Susan B.
  • “Your journalism is outstanding and rare these days.” - Mark S.

If you want to ensure the future of nonpartisan, nonprofit Michigan journalism, please become a member today. You, too, will be asked why you donated and maybe we'll feature your quote next time!

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Pay with PayPal Donate Now