Federal government shutdown idles program that could help in Line 5 spill

Straits of Mackinac

A National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration computer system that provides information on currents, water temperature, ice and waves in the Great Lakes has been turned off because of federal government shutdown.

A forecasting system that helps Great Lakes weather predictions and would aid in the response to a rupture of the Line 5 oil pipeline is among the casualties of the federal government’s partial shutdown.

Computers that feed information into the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Great Lakes Coastal Forecasting System have been off since late December, NOAA researchers say. That’s when parts of the federal government were shuttered amid a stalemate over President Donald Trump’s calls for a $5 billion wall along the southern border.

The forecasting system — a set of three-dimensional computer models — provides information on currents, water temperature, ice and waves in the Great Lakes. A specific model forecasts conditions in the Straits of Mackinac, the turbulent gateway between Lakes Michigan and Huron.

Related: The federal shutdown hit Sleeping Bear Dunes. So volunteers rushed in.
Related: Federal shutdown gets real in Beer City: Michigan summer ales in jeopardy​
Related: Six things to know about the federal government shutdown in Michigan​

That’s where a piece of Enbridge Energy’s Line 5 oil pipeline stretches along 4.5 miles of lakebed. It has never leaked in the Straits over 65-years of operation, but it has attracted widespread scrutiny in recent years after a different Enbridge pipeline spewed more than 1.2 million gallons of crude into the Kalamazoo River.

Eric Anderson, an oceanographer in NOAA’s Great Lakes Research Lab, built the forecasting model in 2012. He said it’s crucial for mapping where oil might travel in the Straits during a spill.

Researchers at University of Michigan and Michigan Technological University are among those who have used the model to map spill scenarios were Line 5 to rupture, an unlikely scenario that could prove catastrophic for the Great Lakes.  Worst case forecasts have varied. Michigan Tech, for instance, estimated a spill could reach as many as 437 miles of shoreline along Lakes Michigan and Huron.

The NOAA forecasting system would also prove handy after a spill, Anderson said. It would allow the agency to tell the Coast Guard where oil might travel days after an incident.

But that forecast will be out of commission until Washington decides to govern again.

Anderson said his lab is considered “non-essential,” during the Washington statemate, meaning he and his colleagues are furloughed — and their research is halted — until Trump and Congress reopen the government.

“That [forecasting] model is down,” Anderson told Bridge Magazine. “The day after Christmas, we had to go into the lab and we had to shut everything down.”

That means lake data isn’t feeding weather forecasts, worsening predictions of conditions such as lake-effect snow, Anderson said.

Some “essential” NOAA staffers would still work with the U.S. Coast Guard during a spill response, but they would lack up-to-date data to predict where oil would travel after the initial hours of a spill, Anderson said.

“That becomes all the difference between say, protecting Mackinac Island or protecting, you know, Wilderness State Park on the other side of the Straits (in the town of Carp Lake).”

Commander Shaun Edwards, who leads the Coast Guard’s response efforts in Sault Sainte Marie, told Bridge he was not aware that NOAA had turned off its data model in the Straits

The forecasting gap would not affect the Coast Guard’s response in the first few hours of a spill, Edwards said. With boats and oil skimmers in the water and planes overhead, his team would largely respond to “what we see.”

“It’s important that people understand we’d still be out there cleaning up and doing the response and all, based on what we’d see visually. We’d be actively removing oil from the water,” Edwards said.

But Edwards said the data pause might limit the Coast Guard’s ability to “[look] a few days ahead” to where oil might end up —  complicating decisions over where to place protective booms.

(Those Coast Guard responders are working without pay until the government opens.)  

Enbridge downplayed the significance of NOAA’s partial shutdown.

“In the unlikely event of an actual incident we would rely on real-time data. We would collect data through air sampling, overflights, field recon and weather monitoring to guide the response team in orchestrating an effective response,” Ryan Duffy, an Enbridge spokesman told Bridge.

“The fact that NOAA is temporarily shut down has almost no impact on an oil release response. Enbridge can easily replace the services it provides,” he added.

Line 5’s critics are pointing to the forecasting trouble to renew their calls to halt oil through the Straits.

“Without this critical information, a Line 5 pipeline rupture could be devastating.” Liz Kirkwood, executive director of For Love of Water, a nonprofit advocacy group, said Wednesday in response to an MLive report on the issue.  “As public trustees and defenders of our Great Lakes, the State of Michigan must take swift emergency action to protect our Great Lakes from a catastrophic oil spill by shutting down Line 5 oil operations until the federal shutdown is over.”

Facts matter. Trust matters. Journalism matters.

If you learned something from the story you're reading please consider supporting our work. Your donation allows us to keep our Michigan-focused reporting and analysis free and accessible to all. All donations are voluntary, but for as little as $1 you can become a member of Bridge Club and support freedom of the press in Michigan during a crucial election year.

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Donate now

Comment Form

Add new comment

Dear Reader: We value your thoughts and criticism on the articles, but insist on civility. Criticizing comments or ideas is welcome, but Bridge won’t tolerate comments that are false or defamatory or that demean, personally attack, spread hate or harmful stereotypes. Violating these standards could result in a ban.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.


Kevin Grand
Thu, 01/17/2019 - 6:10pm

I guess that Speaker Pelosi needs to end the vacations that her fellow democrats have been taking and get back to work!

I hear that Rep. Lawrence and her colleagues just loved catching some rays on the beach in Puerto Rico and taking in an special performance of "Hamilton" just a few days ago.


Fri, 01/18/2019 - 9:39am

The Pelosi and The House already voted on and passed a bill that includes $1.5 billion for border security; the exact same bill that passed in the Senate back in December. That bill is sitting on Mitch McConnell's desk and he refuses to put up for a vote, instead he's ceding control of the Senate to Trump.

Kevin Grand
Fri, 01/18/2019 - 7:34pm

Last time I checked, $5.7-billion was needed.

Since a mob tried rushing the border at least twice over the past few weeks, I'd say that The Wall now falls under national defense (an actual function of the federal government).

Sun, 01/20/2019 - 3:54pm

You are well informed. Until the Re-publicans can find a way to use the $1.5 B toward Mexican border security, why throw good money after bad? The "stone-walling" GOP is great at building walls, but clueless about "building bridges."