Meet Michigan’s ‘dead’ voters. They’re quite alive, despite false fraud claims

Absentee ballots were stored in bins in Grand Rapids for pre-processing. President Donald Trump and his supporters are now alleging wholesale fraud in Michigan and other states, in large part because absentee votes favored his opponent, Democrat Joe Biden. (Bridge photo by Daytona Niles)

Related: Dead ‘voter’ cited in Trump lawsuit never cast ballot, Michigan records show

LANSING — Donna Brydges is very much alive and playing cribbage with her husband in their home near Ludington. June Aiken of Napoleon Township is “alive and well” too — “quite well, in fact,” according to police. Same goes for William Bradley of Detroit, whose father of the same name died decades ago. 

You wouldn't know it from social media, where supporters of President Donald Trump last week alleged voter fraud as they falsely claimed proof that Brydges, Aiken, Bradley and other Michiganders were dead but had cast ballots in the Nov. 3 election.

Like many false fraud claims that have spread online in the last week, officials say the accusations were triggered by a series of isolated data input errors by some of Michigan's 1,603 local and county election clerks.

In Michigan, clerks and their election workers enter voter and ballot information in a statewide database known as the Qualified Voter File. And yes, they occasionally make mistakes, as they do in every election before they are eventually caught and rectified.

Consider the case of Brydges: She is 75 years old, but the Qualified Voter File listed her birthdate as Jan. 1, 1901, which would have made her 119 years old, an unlikely age that fueled the pro-Trump claim that dead voters had cast ballots here. 

In reality, 1/1/1901 was a default date likely used when the township first transferred paper registration records into the computer system years ago, Hamlin Township Clerk Catherine Lewis told Bridge Michigan. 

Placeholder dates are "occasionally used if a registration exists but the exact birthday of the voter is not known by the local clerk," added Tracy Wimmer, a spokesperson for Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson. 

When Brydges became a central figure in the internet conspiracy theory, officials checked her driver's license records and confirmed that she was born in 1945.

Would-be internet sleuths had already plastered her name across the internet, however, after one filmed themselves looking her up in the state's online Michigan Voter Information Center, which showed she was born in 1901 and had cast an absentee ballot.  

Brydges is alive, properly applied for an absentee ballot, provided her state-issued driver license with that application and returned her ballot in a properly signed and sealed envelope, said Lewis, who expressed confidence that "nothing improper occurred."

"I would also note that the voter is personally known to me as a township resident, and that there is no provision of Michigan law that would invalidate an absentee ballot based on a typographical error in the state's qualified voter database," said Lewis, a Republican.

Bridge Michigan was not able to reach Brydges for this story, but The Associated Press talked to her by phone last week. She confirmed her identity and passed the phone to her husband, who also verified his wife was alive: “She’s actually beat me in a game of cribbage,” he said.

A similar clerical error was discovered in Jackson County’s Napoleon Township, where Trump supporters claimed a woman born in 1900 had improbably voted in the presidential election, pointing to an online obituary for a local woman with the same first and last name. 

But that obituary was for a June Aiken with a different middle name, according to the Secretary of State’s Office. Again, a placeholder birthdate may have been used in the Qualified Voter File for a woman whose driver’s license shows she was born in 1926. 

June A. Aiken is "a regular voter, and there is no evidence she has died," Wimmer said. 

In fact, local police investigated the matter after it was flagged by Napoleon Township Deputy Clerk Mary LaRocque. 

"To the best of our records, we have only one ballot filed under the name June Aiken," said Deputy Police Chief Matt Peters, who told Bridge he spoke with the voter directly. "She's 94-years old, alive and well. Quite well actually."

While the investigation is technically not yet closed, “there's no evidence at this point of any fraud or any intent to defraud the system at all,” Peters told Bridge. The living June Aiken appears to have married into the family of the deceased June Aiken, he said.

The errors don't prove fraud, but they do point to flaws in the state’s Qualified Voter File.  As of this summer, a Bridge review showed there were more than 16,000 people listed in the database with a birth date of 1920 or earlier, including Gabriel Konowich of Flint, born in 1892; he died before 2010, according to a sibling’s obituary. 

Konowich was among a series of dead Michiganders who received an absentee voter application this year, fueling speculation that Benson’s push for mail-in voting could open the door to fraud. 

Benson, a Democrat who mailed the applications en masse, has argued that returned mail actually can help Michigan clean up its records by alerting clerks of change of address or other life circumstances.

That cleanup doesn't appear to have happened yet, at least not to any great extent. As of last week, the Qualified Voter File still listed 15,249 voters with birth dates that would make them at least 100 years old, including 143 people from 1850, before the Civil War. Of those, 567 had a listed birthdate of 1900 and another 113 listed 1901, suggesting there may be other placeholder birth dates still in the file. 

About 3,400 of the questionable records — 22 percent of the statewide total — are for voters in Detroit, which has about 7 percent of the state's total population. 

Bridge Michigan randomly checked records for 10 of those people, and there is no indication any of them cast ballots last week.

CNN fact checkers examined records for 50 Michiganders whose names appeared on a list of allegedly dead voters that was circulated online this week. They also found no evidence of fraud: 37 of the people are dead but had not voted, five are alive and did vote and eight others are alive but did not vote. 

The Trump campaign continues to amplify the claims, however. Monday, in three separate fundraising emails, the campaign alleged without evidence that the Biden campaign "wants ballots counted" even if they are from "deceased voters."

In Detroit, both internet sleuths and Clerk Janice Winfrey’s office appear to have confused 61-year-old William Bradley with his father, who died 36 years ago but had lived at the same address and had the same name, aside from a different middle name. 

"118-year-old William Bradley voted via an absentee ballot in Wayne County, Michigan this year," Ryan Fourner, founder of Students for Trump, wrote in Facebook post shared more than 14,000 times. "William died in 1984. They’re trying to steal this election."

In reality, there were two William Bradleys in the Qualified Voter File registered at the same address in Detroit, according to the Department of State. It appears a local elections worker incorrectly recorded an absentee ballot cast by the younger Bradley as one cast by the elder, an error that has since been corrected. 

"The most likely explanation is that a ballot submitted by the 1959 Bradley was accidentally recorded as being received from the 1902 Bradley," said Wimmer, a spokesperson for the Department of State. 

The younger Bradley confirmed his identity in a phone call with POLITIFACT, telling the fact-checking organization that he proactively called the City of Detroit after his name popped up in the online conspiracy theory. 

Michigan has processes in place to reject ballots from dead voters, even those who properly voted by absentee ballot but then died before Election Day, Wimmer told Bridge. 

"On rare occasions, a ballot received for a living voter may be recorded in a way that makes it appear as if the voter is dead. This can be because of voters with similar names ... or because of inaccurately recorded birth dates in the qualified voter file," she said. 

"In such scenarios, no one ineligible has actually voted, and there is no impact on the outcome of the election. Local clerks can correct the issue when it is brought to their attention."

— Bridge reporter Mike Wilkinson contributed to this story

Facts matter. Trust matters. Journalism matters.

If you learned something from the story you're reading please consider supporting our work. Your donation allows us to keep our Michigan-focused reporting and analysis free and accessible to all. All donations are voluntary, but for as little as $1 you can become a member of Bridge Club and support freedom of the press in Michigan during a crucial election year.

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Donate now

Comment Form

Add new comment

Dear Reader: We value your thoughts and criticism on the articles, but insist on civility. Criticizing comments or ideas is welcome, but Bridge won’t tolerate comments that are false or defamatory or that demean, personally attack, spread hate or harmful stereotypes. Violating these standards could result in a ban.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Comments

GOP lies
Tue, 11/10/2020 - 4:35pm

Republicans make unsubstantiated claims that journalist are forced to debunk.

Herd Mentality
Tue, 11/10/2020 - 8:33pm

If I payed any attention at all about what the mainstream press say's has been happening, I might think these cases of "fraud" and dead people voting was a bunch of Malarkey.

I guess it's a good thing I watch FOX News.

The rift between Fox News' opinion hosts and news anchors .
https://www.businessinsider.com/fox-news-shepard-smith-trump-news-covera...

https://hillreporter.com/fox-news-argues-that-tucker-carlson-doesnt-have...

Stupid, partisan ,fake news!

Wait? What did I just do?

Kelly
Wed, 11/11/2020 - 7:34am

Three instances of alleged voter fraud were supposedly debunked so that proves that all allegations must be false also.

In your own article you highlight the fraud. Voters with one birth date being sent ballots for a voter with the same name but different birth date. Then trying to justify it by calling it a "placeholder" instead of what it really was, forging official documents. Police and the courts routinely prosecute people who put wrong birth dates on official documents (think alcohol and tobacco purchases). When it comes to voting for Democrats though it's acceptable.

Nick Ciaramitaro
Wed, 11/11/2020 - 11:46am

You jump to the conclusion that these votes were cast for Democrats. Once a vote is accepted and tabulated, unless the ballot is marked as challenged, it is no longer able to be associated with the voter. Therefore, we don't know who they voted for unless they tell us. One case involving a ballot cast for a recently deceased family member did come forward and indicated that they thought they were doing the right thing by voting her ballot for Trump. Others have not indicated who they voted for. The argument is a waste of time. If the ballot was not challenged before it was counted, it can't be retrieved. There are very few such incidences and we don't know who they voted for but in any event are far fewer than needed to impact the result.

Bob
Fri, 11/20/2020 - 8:06am

As I read it they were sent applications for ballots, not ballots themselves. That’s a big difference.

Mark
Wed, 11/11/2020 - 9:27am

I want a reporting of facts, not opinions or a slant in any direction. This article clearly has a slant. If you are going to turn into another CNN or FOX, I will cancel my monthly subscription donation. Just the facts please. I have promoted you to my friends an business associates who now read. If I am going to start getting opinions, I will move on.

Kari
Thu, 11/12/2020 - 4:52pm

Weird..... you said alive and well and yet here is her obituary!!!
Aiken, June Pauline Age 98, of Napoleon Township, passed away at her home February 12, 2019 under the loving care of her family and Henry Ford Allegiance Hospice. She is survived by three children; Dennis Aiken, Douglas Aiken and Judith Serafin, seven grandchildren; Steve (Betsy) Taylor, Trevor, Tracy, Nicole, Christopher, David Aiken and Brian (Molly) Serafin, thirteen great grandchildren, five great-great grandchildren, sister; Chloe Miller, many nieces and nephews. She was preceded in death by her beloved husband of 72 years, Harry P, in 2012, grandson Todd Serafin, siblings; Pat Mohr, Sally Bloomer, Hobart and Robert Ratcliff, daughter in law; Loretta Aiken and son in law; Dennis Serafin. She was a beautician at Field's Department store in Jackson for many years, loved visiting their cabin in Leota, enjoyed snowmobiling and visiting casinos. Mrs. Aiken has been cremated and graveside interment services will be held in the spring at Oak Grove Cemetery, Napoleon. Contributions in her memory are directed to the Henry Ford Allegiance Hospice.

Joel Kurth
Thu, 11/12/2020 - 6:49pm

Hi Kary. Thank you for your comment. The article mentions this obituary and fact that there are two June Aikens from Napoleon Twp. who had different middle names but were related by marriage.

This is an obituary for June P. Aiken, who died and did not vote.  June A. Aiken is alive and voted. The local police checked on her and confirmed. 

The deputy chief told us he believes June A. Aiken married into the family so ended up with the same name as June P. Aiken, even though they aren't blood relatives. 
No comprende??
Fri, 11/13/2020 - 8:00pm

Did you — CAN YOU — read?? It specifically says June A. Aiken is alive and voted. Man, you really got us there! Excellent research!

Who has egg on their face??

VERIFIED
Sat, 11/14/2020 - 7:15pm

https://www.ctvnews.ca/mobile/politics/new-brunswick-election-vote-count...

Just Look up the 2014 elections in New Brunswick Canada! they used the SAME Dominion machines and literally the same “glitch” occurred few hours into the vote count. And guess who lost that race.. They can deny the voting machines were at fault, but the Dominion Memory Cards that were walked in from other counties to tally votes are universal SanDisk memory cards that anyone can manually add or subtract from the count. You can verify all this by a simple web search. Dominion equipment manual is on michigan gov. Dominion is acting appalled at the accusations but they were accused of the same situation in 2014 and allowed this issue to occur again.

Falax41
Sun, 11/15/2020 - 12:16pm

There are over 8 million registered voters in Michigan. The 16,000 voters in the list should ALL be checked. A sampling of 10 or even 50 is sooooooo insignificant 0.0000125% to 0.0000625%. You actually have almost the same odds of winning 100k or better in the states lottery. If you would actually do your job, and verify each and every one on the list, your article would have some merit to it. Your statistical odds would be .02% which is actually still too small of a sample for good results, but at least in the right direction.

If you were making machine controlled parts and adhering to ISO 2859 Level III standards, you would have to do 2000 random samples without any errors of any kind to pass. Having the birth date wrong alone would be considered an error, and thus would fail the testing. I believe elections should be held to even higher standards than that.

Do your job, report accurately with sample sizes that are statistically significant, or don't report at all... you are beginning to be part of the problem with inaccurate estimates.

Bob
Fri, 11/20/2020 - 8:05am

What’s preventing you from checking and reporting back?