Skip to main content
Bridge Michigan
Michigan’s nonpartisan, nonprofit news source

Journalism protects democracy

Trustworthy, nonpartisan local news like ours spurs growth, fosters relationships, and helps to ensure that everyone is informed. This is essential to a healthy democracy. Will you support the nonprofit, nonpartisan news that makes Michigan a better place this election year?

Make your tax-deductible contribution today.

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Pay with PayPal Donate

Redistricting proposal to appear on Michigan ballot, only Supreme Court in way

Update July 31: Republican Supreme Court justices have ties to Michigan gerrymandering group
Update July 6: Michigan Supreme Court will decide redistricting battle

An effort to change the way Michigan draws voting district lines will officially appear on the ballot this November, pending a challenge before the state Supreme Court.

The Michigan Board of State Canvassers unanimously approved the proposal Wednesday as cheers of supporters filled a fluorescent-lit hall of the Lansing Center.

Related: Emails suggest Republicans gerrymandered Michigan to weaken ‘Dem garbage’
Update: Bill Schuette asks Michigan Supreme Court to reject redistricting proposal
Related: Michigan justices backed by opponents of redistricting proposal

Opinion: Two ex-Michigan GOP lawmakers want a vote on redistricting

“Now our job is to make sure the people of Michigan know what this is about,” Katie Fahey, executive director of the group behind the proposal, Voters Not Politicians told reporters Wednesday. “This is a really critical reform that will impact elections from now until Michigan stops doing elections.”

Currently, Michigan’s state legislators redraw district lines every ten years after the U.S. Census. Whichever party is in power during that process can greatly influence how those lines are drawn, which has led to accusations of partisan gerrymandering. The ballot initiative would change the system to create a 13-person board of citizens responsible for drawing the lines with the help of consultants and public hearings.

Supporters of the Voters Not Politicians proposal were thrilled with the Board’s decision to certify. At least 200 volunteers attended the board of canvassers meeting.

“We wanted to make a statement of how many people this is passionately important for,” said Gayle Steiner, a volunteer who came from Ann Arbor to witness the vote.

While Wednesday’s ruling was a major victory for supporters of the Voters Not Politicians’ proposal, opponents still hope a possible Supreme Court challenge to its legality will knock it off before election day rolls around.

“I think it just helps spread doubt, which is probably part of the opposition’s strategy,” Fahey said when asked how the outstanding decision could affect the campaign. “But today we had a very clear decision by the Board of State Canvassers that we will be on the ballot and we plan to proceed with that ruling.”

The challenge, introduced by group Citizens Protecting Michigan’s Constitution, argues that the Voters Not Politicians proposal would too broadly change the state constitution and doesn’t properly specify those changes in the petition language.

The state Court of Appeals disagreed with the group’s argument in a decision issued earlier this month. The group appealed to the Supreme Court, which has yet to determine whether they will consider the case.

“We believe the Court of Appeals got this wrong,” Citizens Protecting Michigan’s Constitution, the group opposing the initiative, wrote in a statement released after Wednesday’s ruling. “The action of the Michigan Board of Canvassers is a step in the process but not the end of the process.”

“What the Board of Canvassers is doing is an administrative function,” Dave Doyle, spokesman for Citizens Protecting Michigan’s Constitution, told Bridge earlier this week. The Supreme Court has pulled a proposal off of the ballot after certification as recently as 2001, according to the court clerk’s office.

The groups are expecting to hear from the High Court in mid-to-late July, Fahey said. The Court has until September 7, when constitutional amendment wording is due to the Secretary of State, to issue a decision.

Only donate if we've informed you about important Michigan issues

See what new members are saying about why they donated to Bridge Michigan:

  • “In order for this information to be accurate and unbiased it must be underwritten by its readers, not by special interests.” - Larry S.
  • “Not many other media sources report on the topics Bridge does.” - Susan B.
  • “Your journalism is outstanding and rare these days.” - Mark S.

If you want to ensure the future of nonpartisan, nonprofit Michigan journalism, please become a member today. You, too, will be asked why you donated and maybe we'll feature your quote next time!

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Pay with PayPal Donate Now