Dana Nessel sues opioid firms under Michigan law intended for drug dealers

Michigan’s governor, attorney general and top doctor announced a 100-page lawsuit against four drug distributors that, according to the filing, will hold the companies “civilly liable for the devastation that their facilitation of the illegal opioids market in Michigan has wrought.” (Bridge photo by Robin Erb)

With opioids killing five Michiganders a day last year, the state’s top health and law enforcement executives are going after pharmaceuticals distributors in a novel way — by treating them like drug dealers.

The state of Michigan filed a lawsuit Tuesday that Attorney General Dana Nessel touted as the first in the country to go after opioid distributors using a law passed to pursue drug dealers. Nessel announced the suit along with Gov. Gretchen Whitmer and the state’s chief medical executive, Dr. Joneigh Khaldun.

The Wayne County Circuit Court suit, filed in Detroit, names as defendants Deerfield, Illinois-based Walgreens, Ohio-based Cardinal Health Inc., Texas-based McKesson Corporation, and Pennsylvania-based AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation.

The companies “blithely went about their business,” creating a “barrage” of pills that created the state’s deadly addiction, said Kelly Rossman-McKinney, Nessel’s spokeswoman, allegations the companies have denied.

In 2018, more than 2,000 of roughly 2,600 drug overdose deaths in Michigan were opioid-related. It was the first time in six years that overdose deaths decreased in the state, albeit slightly.

According to the Washington Post, cited by the Michigan suit, nearly three billion opioid pills arrived in Michigan between 2006 and 2012 (amounting to more than 1.1 million pills a day). 

“The addicts created by the wide availability of prescription opioids turned anywhere they could to feed their addictions… In addition, many opioid users, having become addicted, but no longer able to obtain prescription opioids, have turned to heroin,” the 100-page lawsuit claims.

The suit aims to hold defendants “civilly liable for the devastation that their facilitation of the illegal opioids market in Michigan has wrought.” Nessel, on Tuesday, projected damages against the defendants to exceed $1 billion, according to The Detroit News

According to the suit, the defendant drug companies sold opioids “in ways that facilitated and encouraged their flow into the illegal, secondary market” without proper safeguards. The companies failed to monitor or report suspicious orders, including by knowingly selling pain pills to so-called pill mills, the suit charged. 

The companies also face allegations elsewhere that they helped fuel the national opioid epidemic

In a written statement provided to Bridge, AmerisourceBergen noted its role “across different therapies, with the distribution of opioid-based products constituting less than two percent of our sales.”

The distributor said it is “committed to collaborating” in the fight against opioid abuse and refuses service to customers who might misuse the drugs. It said it also provides daily information to U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration about “every single order of these products that we distribute.”

A spokesman with Healthcare Distribution Alliance, the national trade group representing wholesale distributors, noted that these companies specialize in logistics, rather than drug research, manufacturing, marketing or prescribing. 

“The idea that distributors are responsible for the number of opioid prescriptions written defies common sense and lacks understanding of how the pharmaceutical supply chain actually works and is regulated,” spokesman John Parker said in a statement.

“Those bringing lawsuits would be better served addressing the root causes, rather than trying to redirect blame through litigation,” he said.

In October, Cardinal Health, McKesson and AmerisourceBerger agreed in a settlement to pay $215 million to two Ohio counties, Cuyahoga and Summit, as part of federal opioid litigation. As part of the deal, a drug maker also will contribute $20 million in cash and $25 million worth of generic Suboxone, a drug used to treat opioid addiction.

The three distribution companies did not admit to any liability in the Ohio litigation, according to press releases on their respective web sites.

“While the companies strongly dispute the allegations made by the two counties, they believe settling the bellwether trial is an important stepping stone to achieving a global resolution and delivering meaningful relief,” press releases read on each web site.

In Michigan, the four distributors provided more than 75 percent of the opioids provided to Michigan, according to the Tuesday lawsuit. McKesson was the top distributor of oxycodone and hydrocodone in Michigan, with AmerisourceBergen, Cardinal Health, Walgreens being the second, third, and fourth largest suppliers, according to the lawsuit.

Rossman-McKinney, Nessel’s spokeswoman, said the state originally considered suing under a federal consumer protection law, but that statute would have required the state to prove the drugs were faulty or flawed.

They are neither: “The opioid pills do exactly what they are manufactured to do,” Rossman-McKinney said.

So the state sued under the Michigan Drug Dealer Liability Act of 1994

“Defendants used their licenses to distribute controlled substances in Michigan as a cover for what is essentially a criminal enterprise,” according to the lawsuit.

“This was not only negligent; it was unlawful, a public nuisance and, as a result, their actions subject these companies to liability under Michigan’s Drug Dealer Liability Act,” Nessel said in a statement.

In November, Whitmer announced a state goal of reducing the number of opioid deaths by half in five years. Nessel said Wednesday said she and the governor had promised “that the state would no longer sit on the sidelines while companies profited from an addiction they helped create  – an addiction that has claimed loved ones from our families and has devastated our communities.”

“The opioid epidemic continues to be fed by these companies precisely because the fines and suspensions imposed by the DEA did nothing to change their business practices,” Nessel said, according to the announcement from her office. 

Stephan Currie, executive director of the Michigan Association of Counties, said he was encouraged by the suit and that it will complement legal efforts elsewhere. 

The long-term goal is prevention and education. Short term, he and others hope that counties will be reimbursed for damages caused by addiction and misuse — additional costs for court time, jail space and public health outreach, for example.

“There are major costs that the counties have already borne,” he said.

Facts matter. Trust matters. Journalism matters.

If you learned something from the story you're reading please consider supporting our work. Your donation allows us to keep our Michigan-focused reporting and analysis free and accessible to all. All donations are voluntary, but for as little as $1 you can become a member of Bridge Club and support freedom of the press in Michigan during a crucial election year.

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Donate now

Comment Form

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Comments

Vince Caruso
Tue, 12/17/2019 - 9:39pm

Don't forget they are hiding at least $10B of their ilgotten ganes! Drug dealer's turbocharged!

Michael Metzger
Wed, 12/18/2019 - 8:58am

A review of the Complaint reveals that it is not truly the AG that is handling the suit but out of state firm Baron and Budd as well as The Bernstein Law Firm. Has anybody asked what the fee arrangement is with those firms? What % of the Billion will they take that will not go to Michigan and it’s citizens?

Arjay
Wed, 12/18/2019 - 3:13pm

Now isn’t there a Bernstein on the MI Supreme Court? Nah, couldn’t be. Can anyone spell conflict of interest?

middle of the mit
Thu, 12/19/2019 - 3:17am

This issue hits close to home with me because I have friends and family who used to use those products responsibly and are no longer allowed access to those products at the same cost.

They have since adopted cannabis for their pain relief, which may be better, and cheaper considering what pharmacutical companies are charging for the time release versions that appeared shortly after Senators and Congress people started clamping down on these medicines.

That is right! Take my word for what it IS. And for you conservatives, you tell us that bizznizz will leave if taxes are too high, yet FOX NEWS WILL NEVER LEAVE THE LIBERAL TAXHOLE OF MANHATTAN, New York City, New York. EVAH!!!

Why?

That is why you can take my word for my word.

I ain't goin' to lie to ya!

I am still waiting for FOX NEWS to move to rural Kansas for their tax break.

And you will be too.

That is why you still live in a liberal taxhole, instead of up here. A more desirable location.

Get it yet?

Don
Sun, 12/22/2019 - 8:26am

Have you ever talk with any of OUR troops that were in Afghanistan??? I have and their job there was to protect the poppies from the Taliban!!! Remember the Taliban destroyed the poppie crops three month before we attack them!!!! Our military in there protecting the poppies for the drug companies!!!!