Six things to know about the safety of the leading COVID vaccines

Republican legislators and the state’s health department director agree that COVID orders are grinding down a weary state, even possibly driving up suicides. But they butted heads Thursday on a solution. (Shutterstock)

Dec. 17: See where Michigan is shipping coronavirus vaccine, who is getting it

COVID-19 vaccines may have been developed in a hurry, but two months of data suggest they’re safe and even more effective than expected, according to the committee chair advising the U.S. Food and Drug Administration on whether to approve the vaccines.

Arnold Monto, an infectious disease expert at the University of Michigan, on Wednesday called vaccine development efforts to stop COVID-19 “one of the major success stories of the response to the pandemic.”

Monto will chair the FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee meetings over the next two weeks to assess the safety of two leading vaccines. The FDA will then decide whether to approve the vaccines for the U.S. public.

Related stories:

For years, Monto and his team at U-M’s School of Public Health studied the family of coronaviruses that cause common colds and other seasonal respiratory infections, but which also spawned the more deadly coronavirus that’s behind the COVID-19 pandemic. 

Beyond rigorous scientific oversight that involves not only an understanding of and the mechanics of vaccines, there’s another reason to trust the U.S. development and approval process for COVID-19 vaccines, Monto said: “Money talks.”

The global crisis has driven big investment and intense competition among drug companies internationally to ensure vaccines are safe. “There's no incentive,” he said, “for companies to do this unless they're really convinced that they can make money and their vaccine will prove superior.” 

During an hourlong, online presentation Wednesday titled “Is the End in Sight? An Inside Look at the COVID-19 Vaccine Development and Approval Process,” Monto discussed the science behind COVID vaccines, as well as safety protocols, side effects and the need for second doses of the vaccines in development.

He also discussed timetables for the vaccines’ rollout (Hint: Children are in the back of the line in priority for getting vaccinated.)

More than 200 vaccines are in various stages of development worldwide, but two appear to be the clear front-runners.

Monto’s FDA vaccine committee’s Dec. 10 meeting will focus on whether to advise the FDA to authorize a vaccine developed jointly by U.S.-based Pfizer and German-based BioNTech for emergency use.

The United Kingdom greenlit that vaccine this week, becoming the first among Western countries to approve a COVID vaccine.

On Dec. 17, the panel will consider a vaccine developed by Massachusetts-based Moderna. 

Pfizer and Moderna say their vaccines offer at least 94 percent efficacy.

Among Monto’s observations in the hour-long presentation were these:

Warp Speed shouldn’t be a concern.

Vaccine makers have squeezed more than a decade of studies into a year, but the two front-runner vaccines appear safe.

Operation Warp Speed, the federal plan to deliver 300 million COVID vaccines by January, compressed the 15 or 20 years that it normally takes to develop a vaccine into a one-year period, Monto said.

That means studies have been based so far only on about two months worth of data, he said.

At the same time, he argued, the blazing speed of development shouldn’t be cause for concern.

Dr. Arnold Monto will lead an FDA advisory committee Dec. 10 as it assesses the Pfizer vaccine. His research team was nearing the publication of eight years of surveillance on coronaviruses this spring when the SARS-CoV-2 — the coronavirus behind the current pandemic — was first confirmed in Michigan. (Bridge photo by Robin Erb)

Scientists already had a head start in the race to a vaccine, based on past studies of other coronaviruses, including those that cause Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome, or SARS, and Middle East Respiratory Syndrome, or MERS. That work, for example, helped scientists home in on the coronavirus spike proteins, he said, which allow the coronavirus to latch onto and then invade cells.

The urgency of the current worldwide pandemic further “telescoped” the process, so that studies that normally run one after another could instead run “parallel” and drugmakers could begin manufacturing potential vaccines even before they’re approved, he said.

 

What I want to convince you of today is that we are doing exactly what we ordinarily do with vaccine development, but on a shorter timeline,” Monto said.

The leading vaccines are more effective than expected

Early data suggest the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines have surprisingly high efficacy — 94 percent or more, surpassing early expectations of how well developing vaccines would work, he said.

Pfizer was the first out with results of its Phase 3 study. Among 41,135 study participants who received two doses of the vaccine or the placebo, 170 had confirmed COVID-19 cases. Of those testing positive, 162 had received a placebo, while just 8 were in the group receiving the vaccine. 

Of the 10 people who developed severe cases of COVID-19, nine were among those who received placebos. 

Moderna announced similar efficacy results.

Results of a third vaccine — developed by AstraZeneca in the United Kingdom — have been less clear. That vaccine likely will be the next in front of the FDA committee, Monto said Wednesday.

More research is needed to determine how long vaccine immunity will last, said Monto and Emily Toth Martin, who with Monto directs the Michigan Influenza Center, one of five U.S. sites that collect flu data for the CDC. She moderated the Wednesday presentation.

“We're going to have to be watching carefully — how long protection continues after all of these vaccines are administered even outside of clinical trials,” she said.

How long immunity lasts from a COVID-19 vaccine is still unknown, said Emily Toth Martin, co-director of the Michigan Influenza Center, one of five U.S. sites that collect flu data for the CDC. (Bridge photo by Robin Erb)

An ‘end in sight’ by spring?

The separate panel, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, which advises the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on the use of vaccines,  recommended Tuesday that healthcare workers and nursing home residents be the first in line for the vaccine, followed by other vulnerable populations. 

(A Michigan plan lists those vulnerable populations as including people with underlying medical conditions, the elderly, those from racial and ethnic minority groups and tribal communities, people in correctional facilities, the homeless, those attending colleges and universities, those in rural communities, with disabilities, or those who are under- or uninsured.)

If Pfizer and Moderna’s vaccines are quickly approved — followed possibly by AstraZeneca’s or another — vaccines for other populations may arrive as soon as “late winter into the spring,” Monto said.

Children likely will be among the last in line

Even if the vaccines are approved, don’t expect them for everyone any time soon. Studies to date have excluded young children, as it’s unclear whether they might react differently to a vaccine than adults, he said.

In fact, in rare cases, children infected with COVID-19 have uniquely developed Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome, or MIS-C, which can lead to organ failure. Most cases of MIS-C have been reported before the age of 14, according to the most recent data by the CDC.

“I would predict that, as we go forward, we may well slowly use the vaccines in older children,” Monto said.

Mild side effects, so far 

“There are mild, acceptable side effects to these vaccines,” Monto said, mostly aching and fever, but studies will continue as the vaccine is distributed.

“There is no indication that we're going to have any surprises, but obviously, you don't know what's going to happen … Safety monitoring is going to continue,” he said.

Additionally, he said, “this is the first generation of (COVID) vaccines, we may have improved vaccines come up later on.”

Double doses

Both the Moderna and Pfizer vaccines as well as others in development will require double doses about a month apart. That will complicate the already-complex logistics in getting the shots to the public, but ensures the highest effectiveness, he said.

While studies of the Pfizer vaccine suggest a person “may get protection earlier, before you get the second dose,” he said, “you're not as fully protected until you get the second dose.”

Facts matter. Trust matters. Journalism matters.

If you learned something from the story you're reading please consider supporting our work. Your donation allows us to keep our Michigan-focused reporting and analysis free and accessible to all. All donations are voluntary, but for as little as $1 you can become a member of Bridge Club and support freedom of the press in Michigan during a crucial election year.

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Donate now

Comment Form

Add new comment

Dear Reader: We value your thoughts and criticism on the articles, but insist on civility. Criticizing comments or ideas is welcome, but Bridge won’t tolerate comments that are false or defamatory or that demean, personally attack, spread hate or harmful stereotypes. Violating these standards could result in a ban.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Comments

Bryan Watson
Thu, 12/03/2020 - 11:03pm

Thank you for this valuable information. I am wondering how much of the trial populations were made up of “people with underlying medical conditions, the elderly, those from racial and ethnic minority groups and tribal communities, people in correctional facilities, the homeless, those attending colleges and universities, those in rural communities, with disabilities, or those who are under- or uninsured”. These are the vulnerable populations that would be second in line as vaccine recipients when the distribution commences. I hope they were a prominent part of all trials.

pat
Sun, 12/06/2020 - 1:03pm

I've read just one short article (Wash Post, I think) that Pfizer and Moderna judged effectiveness by lack of symptoms. A-Z, I heard swabbed test participants every week. I'd like to hear more about this. (If true, of course, people can be less sure they are not carriers; they could be asymptomatic.)

Linda Kajma
Mon, 12/07/2020 - 10:00am

What a great accomplishment. Definitely a win for the Trump Administration. Great job!