Truth Squad: Counting the flips by Michigan AG candidate Pat Miles

Pat Miles

In an increasingly caustic race for Michigan attorney general, former U.S. attorney Pat Miles has come under concerted attack ‒ not only from his Democratic primary opponent, but in a series of articles in the Michigan Progressive, a progressive media site.

Miles, who has tilted centrist in the past, is opposed by Dana Nessel, a progressive and the lead attorney in the federal court case that ended up overturning Michigan’s ban on gay marriage. (Nessel famously unleashed a campaign ad last year touting herself in this #MeToo era as “the candidate who doesn’t have a penis.”)

The drumbeat of Michigan Progressive attacks on Miles carries a common theme: that the Harvard Law-educated attorney has cynically discarded his moderate past to better compete with Nessel on the party’s left flank.  

Michigan Progressive contends Miles is setting “a record for flip-flopping” on issues from gay marriage to civil forfeiture, and lists a series of position changes by Miles.

We find the Michigan Progressive attacks mostly accurate, even though the publication overreaches a bit.   

The claims

Among the position changes cited:  

Medical marijuana: “Miles refused to say how he voted on the Medical Marijuana Act, which Michigan voters approved in 2008…Now he claims to have voted for medical marijuana in 2008.”  

Marijuana legalization: “Miles had stated for months that he would not take a position on legalization, but follow ‘the will of the voters’ at the ballot box. Two days after a poll was released showing legalization at 61 percent support, Miles reversed his position to be in support of legalization.”

LGBTQ rights: “When Miles ran for Congress against (Republican) Justin Amash in 2010, he opposed same sex-marriage. He also denied a speaking opportunity to an LGBTQ activist as Chairman of the Aquinas College Board, and has troubling anti-LGBTQ ties. Now, he calls himself an ‘ally’ of the LGBTQ community.”

Capital punishment: “Miles said he supported the death penalty in his 2010 congressional run. Now he says he is opposed to it.”

Civil asset forfeiture: “Flip-flopped during the Michigan Radio interview! That's got to be a record.”

The facts

In a September interview on “Off the Record,” a Lansing political talk show, host Tim Skubick asks Miles more than once if he voted for the state ballot measure passed in 2008 to legalize medical marijuana, including this exchange:

Skubick: “Did you vote yes on it?”

Miles: “I’m not going to talk about my personal vote on that issue.”

Then earlier this month, on March 7, in a Facebook post, Miles said he “voted for the medical marijuana ballot initiative in 2008.”

In that same interview last September, Miles is asked if he backs a 2018 ballot measure to legalize recreational marijuana. Miles said then: “It’s up to the voters to decide…I will never use my personal beliefs to undercut what the people decide.”

On March 5, Lansing polling firm EPIC-MRA released a poll that found 61 percent of Michigan voters would vote yes on the ballot proposal. Two days later, again on Facebook, Miles wrote, “I've reviewed the language of the ballot initiative to regulate marijuana like alcohol, and find it to be very thoughtful and well-written, and I support it.”

On gay marriage, Miles was against it before he was for it. In a 2010 candidate survey in his run for Congress, Miles agreed that marriage should “only be between one man and one woman.”

Before that, in 2008, Miles had backed the decision by Aquinas College to cancel a talk by John Corvino, a gay-rights Wayne State University philosophy professor who intended to deliver a lecture entitled "What's Morally Wrong With Homosexuality?"

Miles, the college’s board chairman at the time, said then: “The president is authorized to make those types of decisions regarding on-campus programming and speakers, and his decision was consistent with college and board policy.”

Fast forward to this January, when Miles told Pride Source, a gay rights publication, that his views on gay marriage “evolved” to “where I believe in full equality under the law for everyone and that includes the right of same-sex couples to get married.”

Michigan Progressive also suggested Miles belongs to a church that espouses anti-gay views. The publication shared a 2014 message from Rick Lippert, one-time pastor at Grand Rapids Christian Church, that reads in part: “I do not support homosexuality or ‘homosexual marriage.’”

But according to Lippert’s LinkedIn account, he had left the church a year earlier, in 2013. Jen Eyer, Miles’s campaign spokesperson, said “anti-LGBT rhetoric has never been and is not currently preached at Grand Rapids Christian Church.”

On the death penalty, Miles said during his 2010 congressional race that he supported capital punishment for “certain crimes.”

That sounds similar to his stand in the “Off the Record” interview: “I do believe the death penalty can be appropriate in two very limited circumstances, for mass murders or serial murders where the evidence is absolutely clear that they (crimes) were committed.”

But at a January 13 meeting with 6th Congressional District voters, Miles apparently again evolved, saying: “I am personally opposed to the death penalty. I am very proud that Michigan was one of the first democracies, Western democracies, to outlaw the death penalty in the world.”

Finally, on civil forfeiture, Miles seemed to reverse his position at a March 16 appearance with Nessel on Michigan Radio. The practice, in which law enforcement agencies seize assets of individuals before they are convicted of a crime, has had its critics on the left and the right. A state House bill introduced last year would require a conviction before law enforcement could seize assets under $50,000.

In the Michigan Radio appearance, Miles first states: "There are instances where asset forfeiture is very appropriate,” he said, including forfeiture “before conviction.”

Later in the interview, Miles says to interviewer Lester Graham: “Well, we can go back to the asset forfeiture question if you want. I might have a better sound-bite for you.”

He then adds: “Well, I would say that on asset forfeiture, that we should make sure that there’s due process before people’s assets are taken and that in all cases that law enforcement is not allowed to unilaterally seize assets rather than freeze assets.”

Graham states: “That’s a little different from what you were saying before."

Miles agrees: “It is.”

The call: Mostly accurate.

By and large, Michigan Progressive’s assertion that Miles frequently changes his positions holds up.

Miles declined to say where he stood on legalizing medical marijuana and legalizing recreational marijuana use. Then he came out in support of both. If not a flip-flop, he took fuzzy stands on both before making it clear (in one case, on the heels of decisive polling) where he stood.

He opposed gay marriage. He later said he supported it.

He appears to have expressed different stands on the death penalty in this campaign after supporting it for some crimes in the past.

On civil forfeiture, Miles changed his stand in the course of a single interview.

The suggestion that Miles attended a church whose pastor espoused anti-gay views is not supported. And even if it was true, it’s a stretch to impart views from the pulpit to every congregant.

Hitting back, a Miles campaign spokesperson noted that Liano Sharon, a Michigan Progressive contributor, is Nessel’s cousin. Indeed, Sharon (who acknowledged they are related) shares Nessel’s campaign posts on his Facebook page.

Readers of Michigan Progressive can decide for themselves whether it matters that a key contributor to the publication is Nessel’s second cousin. (Sam Pernick, another Michigan Progressive, said he is the primary author of its articles on Miles.)

Truth Squad is less concerned about the publication’s editorial standards than whether the arrows it directed at Miles had merit. In most instances, they did.

Facts matter. Trust matters. Journalism matters.

If you learned something from the story you're reading please consider supporting our work. Your donation allows us to keep our Michigan-focused reporting and analysis free and accessible to all. All donations are voluntary, but for as little as $1 you can become a member of Bridge Club and support freedom of the press in Michigan during a crucial election year.

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Donate now

Comment Form

Add new comment

Dear Reader: We value your thoughts and criticism on the articles, but insist on civility. Criticizing comments or ideas is welcome, but Bridge won’t tolerate comments that are false or defamatory or that demean, personally attack, spread hate or harmful stereotypes. Violating these standards could result in a ban.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.


Weed Warrior
Tue, 03/27/2018 - 9:24am

Pat Miles is a Pot Hater perpetrator that does not deserve to be elected to the Attorney General's office.. The people will do well, with Dana Nessell! Vote everyday!

Jamie Lowell
Tue, 03/27/2018 - 9:40am

Miles Jr also claims to be agai st mass incarceration yet went out of his way to revive a dormant case and prosecute non-violent state compliant medical marijuana program participants contrary to the federal policy of the time.

Michelle Truskowski
Tue, 03/27/2018 - 9:44am

We need an Attorney Geneneral with a steady hand, that speaks for the people. I've witnessed this each time I've watched Dana Nessel speak. She's a "no nonsense," "do what's right" type of person. She is a passionate supporter of all of us! We need Dana! GRAND RAPID UNITED PROGRESSIVES supports Dana Nessel and she has pledged to shut down Enbridge Line 5 and preserve our Great Lakes and drinking water!

Ann Farnell
Tue, 03/27/2018 - 10:41am

In the most literal sense, Miles hedged some positions, but it seems to me, most politicians wait for the polls to edge them off of ambivalent positions. i don’t see this as a sin. i think it is unfair to expect Miles, who is not gay, to be more forward thinking on same sex marriage at a time when the country as a whole was coming to grips with equal rights for all. Not even the current president has grasped the concept for transgenders even though it seems obvious to more than a majority of Americans now. I think Michigan is fortunate to have two very worthy opponents running in the Democratic primary . i could easily support either one, but i don’t agree that Miles is less worthy because he is willing to flex and take time before he announces his position.

Tue, 03/27/2018 - 11:45am

Thank you for this thoughtful piece. I’ve interviewed hundreds of forfeiture victims and it is never acceptable to take anything from Michigan families without proof of a conviction. Mi LEO and prosecutors have DEVASTATED families in their quest for free money with which to pad their budgets. It’s disgusting and Un-American

michael mack
Tue, 03/27/2018 - 12:03pm

Wow! With these two as the candidates, I can hardly wait to vote in this race!

Mike McCurdy
Tue, 03/27/2018 - 4:52pm

Dana Nessel is an extraudinary Candidate for Attorney General. Thankfully, Democrats shouldn’t need to worry too much about the flip flops of Pat Miles, we have an obvious alternative. Dana Nessel is going to do great things for the Michigan Democratic Party and our entire state.

W Paul Mayhue, ...
Wed, 03/28/2018 - 5:10am

Your article by omission has decimated my Candidate Bill Noakes for Michigan Attorney General by not mentioning his name. I will just say this is wrong and not use any other superlatives to describe your unjust article.

John Mertz
Wed, 03/28/2018 - 9:20am

No one asked him about consumer protection, or anything really important in day to day life, beyond his stand on LBGT equality. You are going to get excited about marijuana legalization? The nonexistent death penalty? What about gerrymandering? What about FOIA? Dark Money? I get the civil forfeiture objections. That needs to be highly regulated. What counts to me is the state gets sound legal representation on issues that are important every day. We have no protection against union busters, business fraudes large and small, price gouging, inflated insurance costs, police abuse, government laziness and inaction, etc. etc.
Getting a buzz on is like having a few belts: not a real issue. Just stop arresting people for possession of MJ and the problem is solved - except Big Brother and Sister need to wet their beaks, first, don't they?
So many moralists making laws for others these days! Liberal means stands for liberty. Liberty does not include being hemmed in by those seeking utopia.
And what's with this "centrist" label now being used to bash people who are not extreme, like the opposite of the Tea Party? I'm on the left of the GOP. I have no idea where the heck you all are. What we need is Frank Kelly for the modern world. I agree this gentleman may not be it. I want so read about his opponent, but he does come across as more lukewarm on equality and fair treatment for all than I would like. Too prosecutorial in his perspective. Needs to be more populist. Less elitist.