CEOs, Republicans add voices to Michigan’s child care ‘crisis’

Michigan provides among the least amount of help to low-income families seeking child care of any state in the nation. A West Michigan business group is leading efforts to boost state investment in high-quality care.

Child care, an issue that wasn’t on the political radar a decade ago, could become one of the major issues facing the administration of newly elected Gov. Gretchen Whitmer.

The number of interest groups wanting to address Michigan’s notoriously stingy child care funding is reaching critical mass, from educators to business CEO’s to a bipartisan crop of new legislators who are attuned to the issue.

The groups are pushing for more child care aid for Michigan’s low-income working families, including the allocation of $63 million in unused federal child care dollars, as well as possible additional funding from the state.

Whitmer spokesperson Tiffany Brown wouldn’t say whether the administration would ask for additional child care funding in Whitmer’s first budget. “We won’t be discussing specific items in the budget until it’s presented in March,” Brown said.

In the meantime, Whitmer is likely to hear from a group of CEO’s from Western Michigan, organized as Talent 2025, who want the state to pump more money into a child care system they say is hobbling Michigan and its families.

“Michigan’s child care system is really in crisis,” said Kevin Stotts, president of Talent 2025. “We see a lack of quality child care as a barrier for the workforce. What we see across Michigan is adults with young children who want to get a job, or work more hours, but can’t because of the lack of spots to enroll their kids, or the costs.”

Kevin Stotts, president of Talent 2025, a West Michigan business group, is helping to frame affordable child care as a workforce, as well as a family, issue.

Michigan has already increased invested in pre-K education, expanding the state-funded Great Start Readiness Program to enroll more four-year-olds to help prepare them for kindergarten. But the state hasn’t been as aggressive at offering assistance to children ages 0-3 ‒ a period when the brain develops rapidly. High-quality child care can help children be better prepared to enter school - an issue in a state that lags most of the nation in academic achievement.

Framing child care as a workforce issue as well has helped the cause gain traction among the business community and Republicans, Stotts said. “The number of calls and emails we’ve gotten from Republican legislators representing rural districts is encouraging. It’s a pretty broad group of legislators who recognize the challenges of childcare on the economy.”

The staggering cost of child care is one of the biggest economic burdens facing Michigan families. Its cost can delay home ownership, force children into cheaper, lower-quality child care, and keep some parents out of the workforce because the cost of care can neutralize job earnings, according to a 2016 report for the Michigan Department of Education on child care access and affordability.

Child care for an infant or toddler can cost upwards to $300 a week at a high-quality center. A parent working 40 hours for Michigan’s minimum wage of $9.25 an hour would earn $370 before taxes in a week.

“Tuition at a quality child care provider is equal to tuition at a public university,” Stotts said. “That’s unsustainable for a working family.”

Compounding the problem for families along the margins, Michigan does little to offset those costs.

Michigan had the lowest income limit for child care assistance in the nation in 2017, at 123 percent of the federal poverty line. A family of three would need to earn less than $25,116 to qualify for state child care aid. (The median household income in Michigan is $54,909.)

Michigan stingy on child-care subsidies

To get state help with child-care costs, the working poor in Michigan have faced the lowest maximum income in the nation for a family of 3 to be eligible. Until last year, the most a family could make and still be eligible is $25,116, or 123 percent of the federal poverty limit of $20,420. That limit was raised to 130 percent in 2018, keeping Michigan in the bottom five. Based on a study of 2017 rates, here's how Michigan compared:  

Rank State Annual max income As percent of poverty level As percent of state's median income
1 Michigan $25,116 123% 38%
2 Indiana $25,608 125 42
3 Alabama $26,208 128 46
4 Idaho $26,208 128 49
5 Nebraska $26,208 128 40
6 Nevada $26,208 128 45
7 Ohio $26,208 128 40
8 Missouri $27,816 136 45
9 Iowa $29,232 143 43
10 Georgia $29,456 144 50
11 West Virginia $29,688 145 51
12 Maryland $29,990 147 33
13 Florida $30,240 148 53
14 Montana $30,240 148 50
15 South Carolina $30,240 148 54
16 Arkansas $30,926 151 61
17 Louisiana $31,860 156 52
18 Kentucky $32,256 158 55
19 Illinois $32,664 160 45
20 Arizona $33,264 163 59
21 Oklahoma $35,100 172 63
22 Utah $35,676 175 58
23 Rhode Island $36,288 178 47
24 South Dakota $36,750 180 57
25 Minnesota $37,264 182 47
26 Kansas $37,296 183 57
27 Oregon $37,296 183 61
28 Wyoming $37,680 185 55
29 Wisconson $37,777 185 54
30 North Carolina $40,176 197 68
31 Delaware $40,320 197 54
32 New Jersey $40,320 197 44
33 New Mexico $40,320 197 78
34 New York $40,320 197 54
35 Pennsylvania $40,320 197 56
36 Washington $40,320 197 55
37 California $42,216 207 62
38 Mississippi $42,999 211 86
39 North Dakota $44,724 219 60
40 Connecticut $45,609 223 50
41 Massachusetts $45,771 224 50
42 District of Columbia $45,775 224 55
43 Hawaii $47,124 231 63
44 Tennessee $47,856 234 85
45 New Hampshire $50,400 247 60
46 Alaska $54,288 266 67
47 Maine $54,589 267 83
48 Vermont $60,480 296 85
* Colorado $33,264-$62,781 163%-307% 45%-85%
* Texas $37,296-$50,913 183%-249% 62%-85%
* Virginia $30,240-$50,400 148%-247% 38%-63%

* These states report ranges and cannot be ranked.

Source: National Women's Law Center

Consider: One parent making $12.10 an hour at a full-time job would have earned too much for aid.

The income limit for assistance was raised in 2018 to 130 percent of the federal poverty line, but that remains among the bottom-five limits in the nation.

Michigan also pays child care providers one of the lowest rates in the nation to care for children who qualify for assistance.

Elisabeth Weston, director of the Early Learning Community Center on the campus of Lansing Community College, said the state reimbursement only pays for about two-thirds of the cost of infant and toddler care at the center. Low-income families have to pay the rest, causing some families to shift to lower-quality care or drop out of the workforce, Weston said, something Weston said she considers a “tragedy.”

Indeed, centers are not required to participate in the state assistance program, and it’s not uncommon for providers who have waiting lists to choose market-price families, whose payments are more secure, over families who qualify for state assistance.

“We have 30 or 40 years of understanding that the first five years of life is the most important for brain development,” Weston said. “What you teach a child from 0 to 3 can’t be redone. Those first years are critical. And yet financial supports haven’t followed that understanding.”

Whitmer made child care an issue in her campaign, saying that she supported increased income limits for child care assistance and higher reimbursement rates. Advocates aren’t about to let her forget that.

“There is a lot of coordinated advocacy with the governor’s office, from many different directions,” said Pat Sorenson, senior policy analyst with the Michigan League for Public Policy (MLPP). “There’s a high level of awareness in the Whitmer administration about affordability of child care.”

MLPP and Talent 2025 both are pitching an eye-opening increase in income eligibility – from 130 percent of the federal poverty line to 250 percent, which would increase eligibility to families making almost $52,000 a year. That increase would be phased in, with Talent 2025 arguing for an initial increase to 185 percent (currently $38,443) of the federal poverty line.

Such increases would cost more, while serving more children from low- and moderate-income working families. According to estimates by Public Sector Consultants, a nonpartisan public policy research firm in Lansing, increasing child care eligibility to 180 percent of the federal poverty line would cost an additional $43 million a year, while serving 21,000 more children than the current 34,000; increasing eligibility to 250 percent of the poverty line would cost $110 million and serve 49,000 more children than currently receiving assistance.

Some of that increase could be defrayed by an additional $63 million in federal child care funding Michigan already has in the bank, said Michigan League for Public Policy’s Sorenson. That additional funding is expected to be given to Michigan annually going forward.

Early education advocates flooded Lansing Tuesday in what organizers claimed was the first significant early education event in Lansing in a decade. They found a receptive audience among some new legislators who came to Lansing from careers in education.

Freshman Rep. Greg VanWoerkom, R-Muskegon, said state investment in child care has traditionally been a Democratic issue. But he theorizes that the arrival in Lansing of many lawmakers with young families from both parties has broadened interest in the issue.

“For me, teaching in a district with a high level of poverty, I understand the need for more funding throughout the system,” said Rep. Lori Stone, D-Warren, a teacher at Fitzgerald Public Schools in Warren, who attended a lunch with early education providers and parents Tuesday.

Stone said she expects the Legislature to try to find additional child care funding this year.

Stone is one of 22 state Legislators sworn into office in January who come to Lansing from careers in teaching or other education jobs (13 Democrats, nine Republicans). Another is Rep. Sheryl Kennedy, D-Davison, a former principal in Walled Lake Public Schools.

“We’ve known for years that if we invest in the early years, we won’t have to support folks after they leave school,” Kennedy said. Now, “everyone recognizes finally if we’re not supporting a quality educational system, that companies will go elsewhere. Once it becomes an economic issue, beyond what is just good for kids, people pay attention.”

Kennedy said she anticipates Whitmer will make education, including child care, a priority.

“Hopefully we’re going to be getting some leadership from Gov. Whitmer’s office, and we can look at how we can appropriately fund our entire educational system, and that will hopefully include some pre-k (and) early childhood care.”

Interest in addressing child care has at least some bipartisan support, in a Capitol where both the House and Senate remain under Republican control.

Freshman Rep. Greg VanWoerkom, R-Muskegon, told Bridge that in his first few weeks in Lansing he has been starting a conversation with House leadership about child care.

VanWoerkom said he and his wife struggled to pay for high-quality child care for their children in a region that has few child care options. It’s those struggles, faced by many of the younger members of the Legislature, that may open the door for some type of reform, VanWoerkom said.

“Traditionally, it’s been more of a Democrat issue,” VanWoerkom said. “But  I think there will be bipartisanship (interest). Maybe it’s a uniqueness of our legislature that we have younger people who are intimately aware of the issue.”

VanWoerkom cautioned against looking for a simple solution to a complex problem. But he agreed with his Democratic colleagues that the time is ripe to begin to address the issue.

“If a family makes a decision for someone to stay home, I’m all for that,” VanWoerkom said. “But demographics have changed and you have more families that are dual income. We need to find a way to get them into the workforce and improve their situation.”

Like what you’re reading in Bridge? Please consider a donation to support our work!

We are a nonprofit Michigan news site focused on issues that impact all citizens. In an era of click bait and biased news, we focus on taking the time to learn both sides of a story before we post it. Bridge stories are always free, but our work costs money. If our journalism helps you understand and love Michigan more, please consider supporting our work. It takes just a moment to donate here.

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Donate now

Comment Form

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Comments

Kevin Grand
Fri, 01/25/2019 - 7:18am

"The number of interest groups wanting to address Michigan’s notoriously stingy child care funding is reaching critical mass, from educators to business CEO’s to a bipartisan crop of new legislators who are attuned to the issue.

The groups are pushing for more child care aid for Michigan’s low-income working families, including the allocation of $63 million in unused federal child care dollars, as well as possible additional funding from the state."

Hey, here's a novel idea!

If these CEO's (the people running these Michigan-based businesses) are having such a problem finding employees, why aren't THEY paying for all of these benefits from their own companies?

If your "business model" relies on shifting the cost of your business to others (didn't The Bridge write about that already this week?), then you have a bad business model.

https://www.bridgemi.com/public-sector/who-pushed-20m-grants-help-ex-gop...

Don
Fri, 01/25/2019 - 9:19am

you are so right<<< and these same CEO backed republicans in inacting laws to make it very hard to run a child care out of your home like the did in the 50 throught 90!!

Jessica Shaw-Nolff
Fri, 01/25/2019 - 11:53am

I want to know why we have $63 million UNUSED federal childcare dollars? This needs to be explained.

Franh Koob
Fri, 01/25/2019 - 9:27am

The companies need to take on this extra spending and offer it as a benefit. If the companies paid their workers a fair living wage this issue would be manageable.

Paul Jordan
Fri, 01/25/2019 - 10:47am

The most expeditious solution to this and many similar problems would be a guaranteed minimal income for every American adult.
This would eliminate many bureaucracies while empowering people to find their own solutions.

Jessica Shaw-Nolff
Fri, 01/25/2019 - 11:52am

As long as child-care falls primarily on a woman's shoulders (which it still does for the majority of households), women will not have true equality in the workplace without afforable, accessible, quality child-care.

R.L.
Fri, 01/25/2019 - 1:35pm

8 years ago our daughter lived in Dearborn and paying $1100 per month for one child in a child care facility , When her second child was born it would go up to over $2000 per month. Her rent was $1125 per month. You do the math. We must address quality child care in this country. I placed 600 nannies ,aupairs childcare all over the U.S. This is a very big social issue. R.L.

Matt
Sat, 01/26/2019 - 9:59am

Ok, from reading here, so you're supposed to go to college for 4++ years (don't count lost wages during those years), pay (according to Bridge commentors) $20K+ a year for that degree so you can get a job paying $30 - $40 per year? And then you have kids so you have to pay $300 weekly so you can keeping working so ...you can pay your student loan? And the conclusion is that the State must subsidize your childcare and/or businesses must be forced to pay you more (a living wage)? A circle of stupidity.

Bones
Wed, 01/30/2019 - 2:16pm

I too believe that we should have an undereducated populace where only the children of the wealthy go to college. Bring on that wage-slavey feudalism and accompanying techno-aristocracy. There's no possible way that this could end poorly