Michigan moves to pause standardized tests amid coronavirus

Standardized tests typically administered to Michigan students primarily consist of the M-STEP for grades 3-8 and 11. (Shutterstock)

Michigan students, homebound for months because of the worst pandemic in a century and facing a return to school with social distancing and possibly face masks, shouldn’t have to take standardized tests.

That was the message of State Superintendent Michael Rice, a bipartisan group of legislators and school leaders from across the state Thursday.



If tests are eliminated for the upcoming school year, students would not take the M-STEP, third-graders would not face the possibility of being held back in grade for poor reading scores on the M-STEP, and teachers would not have student test scores used as part of their annual performance reviews.

In separate statements, leaders in the Legislature, the Michigan Department of Education and school districts all pushed for a reprieve from federally mandated assessments.

Rice told Bridge in an email statement that he will ask the U.S. Department of Education for a waiver of requirements for students assessments for the coming school year, due to the ongoing pandemic. He cited the federal government's approval of standardized test waives this past spring, during the initial surge of COVID-19. 

"State Board of Education President Dr. Casandra Ulbrich and I advocated for a national suspension of the federal testing requirement in a letter to the U.S. Secretary of Education in March, in the midst of the pandemic …  We applied (for a waiver) … and the  waiver was approved,” Rice said. “We initiated this waiver request because we were in a pandemic and state testing was the least of our concerns at the time.

“We are still in the midst of a pandemic and, therefore, are still supportive of waivers of these federal assessment requirements, in addition to a suspension of the testing requirements in state law, including but not limited to those associated with teacher and administrator evaluations, and school accountability.”

Rice’s announcement came just hours after the superintendents of six large intermediate school districts wrote a letter to him and Gov. Gretchen Whitmer asking that they cancel standardized testing for 2020-21.

The letter, delivered Thursday, is signed by the intermediate school superintendents of Wayne, Macomb, Oakland, Washtenaw, St. Clair, Genesee and Monroe counties. 

“We are asking that you seek suspension of federal requirements to administer standardized assessment testing in the 2020-2021 school year,” the letter said. “Every educator's first and foremost priority will be to work with students individually, assess their needs and help them readjust to in-person learning. Standardized testing only provides a snapshot of a student’s performance on a single test and will in no way assist teachers, parents and students with day-to-day instructional needs in the upcoming school year.”

Standardized tests are required by federal law, and are used to assess the educational progress of students, as well as the performance of teachers, schools and states. The M-STEP allows comparisons between schools and student groups. Another test, the National Assessment of Educational Progress, allows comparisons between students in different states.

States were granted waivers to cancel tests this spring, when most schools around the country were closed to try to slow the spread of the coronavirus. Now, some states are moving to request waivers for the coming year.

The Republican-controlled Georgia Legislature and Republican Gov. Brian Kemp want to cancel most standardized tests for the coming school year, and a similar move is afoot in Oklahoma.

“We request the MDE seek those same waivers and give our schools the flexibility they’ll need to help our students get back to class successfully,” the letter said.

Standardized tests typically administered to Michigan students primarily consist of the M-STEP for grades 3-8 and 11. Educators anticipate that students will have lost some academic learning by September, after being without in-person instruction for about six months.

A spokesperson for Whitmer and state superintendent Rice did not immediately return a request for comment.

The request could run into opposition from Republican legislators, who unveiled their own school reopening plan Tuesday that included “benchmark assessments,” which would be some form of standardized tests, to be administered at least three times during the 2020-21 school year. A news release about the plan said tests would “provide detailed information to parents and teachers about where a student needs additional help, ensuring kids do not fall behind in the wake of the public health crisis.”

Whitmer will release her own school reopening plan June 30.

Robert McCann, director of the Tri-County Alliance for Public Education advocacy organization in Southeast Michigan, said standardized tests are not a high priority at a time when families and educators are worried about school safety. “Find me a parent who says they are looking forward to getting their children back to school so they can take tests,” McCann said.

The letter also asked the Michigan Department of Education to release $39 million in federal CARES Act funds for schools it is now holding in reserve.

“We are asking for MDE to immediately release the remaining $39 million to all districts on a per-pupil basis to help them prepare for a return to in-person learning this fall,” the letter said.

Rice told Bridge in a statement that the funds (which MDE calculates to be lower, at about $37 million) will be distributed to local school districts “to address a digital divide between those that have technology and those that don't, and to address mental health service gaps for children.”

Rice said there will be “a competitive application process, based on need, for these dollars shortly.”


Facts matter. Trust matters. Journalism matters.

If you learned something from the story you're reading please consider supporting our work. Your donation allows us to keep our Michigan-focused reporting and analysis free and accessible to all. All donations are voluntary, but for as little as $1 you can become a member of Bridge Club and support freedom of the press in Michigan during a crucial election year.

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Donate now

Comment Form

Add new comment

Dear Reader: We value your thoughts and criticism on the articles, but insist on civility. Criticizing comments or ideas is welcome, but Bridge won’t tolerate comments that are false or defamatory or that demean, personally attack, spread hate or harmful stereotypes. Violating these standards could result in a ban.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.


Kevin Grand
Thu, 06/25/2020 - 9:09pm

If you're not even going to bother monitoring educational progress, then why even have students attend school in the first place?

Matt G
Fri, 06/26/2020 - 9:20am

As if nobody learned anything at school before standardized testing, right? And as if teachers don't already measure students' learning in order to modify their practice in the classroom?

You do realize (haha, almost no one does) that "standardized" means they aren't measuring "progress" but rather they are measuring students against their peers on a bell curve, right? This sort of testing is pointless long before this year, and it only exists to compare schools against each other so that some can be labelled as "failing".

What we used to have (MEAP) and what is actually reasonable to administer is a non-standardized criterion-referenced test that actually gives students and teachers an idea of what students know.

People often confuse (by design) "state standards" and "standardized testing" as being related. They are not.

Bob Balwinski
Fri, 06/26/2020 - 9:44am

Matt G, you are 100% correct. I say this based upon my teaching career and 40 years in public education.

Al Churchill
Sat, 06/27/2020 - 11:45pm

Um, yeah...
Matt G and Bob Balwinski are dead on right based upon hands-on experience with the issue.
Well, their line of reasoning is acceptable in educational circles because it is, demonstrably correct.
Standardized tests, indeed most educational tests, leave much to be desired because their raw scores are a reflection, not only of school quality, but of factors outside of the school that have a greater affect on student success than the schools themselves. Until the two are separated and quantified, the tests are pretty much useless if your goal is to access school value.
Aside from that, school districts do significant internal testing that will tell you more than one state-wide test.
Finally, if you want to know how well your child is doing in school, ask their teacher. That teacher can tell you a hell of a lot more than a standardized test.
Um, yeah...

Kevin Grand
Sun, 06/28/2020 - 12:05pm

Nice spin.

Care to explain the mass exodus of students from the example above if test scores don't really reflect educational achievement?

Parents aren't going to be pulling their children out of those schools if they were impressed with their educational progress.

Or are those declining enrollment numbers not really indicative of the quality of education?

Al Churchill
Sun, 06/28/2020 - 8:13pm

Nice try pal. No cigar.
Also demonstrable fact, not spin.
Nowhere in my commentary did I suggest that test scores do not reflect educational achievement. What I do maintain is that the raw scores presented to the public, relative to standardized tests, are a result of factors outside of school control as much as they are a result of in-school efforts. There is an abundance of supporting research to sustain this being the case. A brief example is illustrated in a statement made by the Michigan Department of Education on their website. They maintain that "The most reliable predictor of school success is the degree to which parents are involved in their childs' education."
Because of outside factors being so dominant in determining how well a student does in school, it follows that a good school can have a terrible test score on a standardized test while a bad school can attain a great test score.
Both Bridge and the Mackinaw Center have recognized this and grade schools accordingly.
So, in answer to your question, declining enrollment numbers do not necessarily reflect educational quality. Sorry.
While I do not have any personal experience with parents moving their child from one school to another, if the move is based upon the raw scores of a state-wide standardized test alone, it is a decision based upon incomplete information and serves nobodys' best interest.
Like I said earlier, no cigar.

Soccer Mom
Mon, 06/29/2020 - 1:42pm

I agree with Matt G.

A. Bellows
Fri, 06/26/2020 - 7:14pm

This is a wise move by Governor Whitmer. With no testing, we are assured that all people will be judged as equal. This is a very enlightened decision.

Sat, 06/27/2020 - 12:16am

What about universities? Which Michigan universities require SAT/ACT, and why?

Sun, 06/28/2020 - 4:22pm

Great idea. Then, let's get the Feds to change the law. Way too much time and money is wasted on this folly, given that nothing ever changes. I'm not against all standardized testing, but it hasn't been working as implemented.

Wed, 07/15/2020 - 1:29pm

This makes no sense. Federal accountability is intended to monitor student achievement. We still need to account for student achievement, especially if hampered by the pandemic. There can be a waiver from consequences, but not from the underlying testing and accountability.