‘Businesses need clarity,’ MI chamber leaders say of shifting COVID rules

Michigan businesses are trying to make sense of changing state and local pandemic restrictions, and how to balance safety precautions with revenue concerns. (Shutterstock)

Michigan businesses spent months adapting to executive orders regulating their operations during the pandemic. Now they’re trying to figure out what rules still apply.

That answer remained unclear late Monday afternoon, after a new round of regulations were announced by the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services (MDHSS) following a court ruling last week appeared to nullify many of the orders set by Gov. Gretchen Whitmer.


“There’s a lot of confusion out there,” said Andy Johnston, executive vice president of government and corporate affairs for the Grand Rapids Area Chamber of Commerce.

Johnston and his colleagues were busy on Monday, like many other business advocacy groups in the state, fielding calls and questions from members about issues like mandatory masks, occupancy limits and liability issues. 

An opinion by the MIchigan Supreme Court on Friday found that a 1945 law that Gov. Gretchen Whitmer was relying on to issue coronavirus executive orders without consent from the Legislature was unconstitutional. Dozens of her executive orders have regulated businesses over the last six months, from the restaurant shut-down to mandating masks and capacity limits. 

Then late Monday afternoon, the state health department issued a new round of requirements: Masks remained mandatory in most settings, but other rules — like those setting restaurant occupancy and preventing bars from reopening — changed. 

It was not immediately clear if the new rules, expiring October 30, are enforceable, whether they would be legally challenged, and if additional guidelines would come. 

Before the MDHSS orders, Johnston of the Grand Rapids chamber, said he had expected Whitmer to work with the Legislature and businesses on the next round of COVID-related guidelines following last week’s Supreme Court decision. Businesses want input, he said, so that both public health and the economy can be protected.

“Businesses need clarity, consistency and transparency on decision-making,” he said. “We hope they come to do that soon.”

The court’s ruling came as the state’s coronavirus numbers tick up and some areas, like college campuses and the Upper Peninsula, experience troubling outbreaks. On Monday, the seven-day rolling coronavirus average in Michigan was 884 new cases, the highest since April 29. About 800 people were listed as hospitalized, up 300 since September 25. 

The rise in hospitalizations coincides with a slowing economic rebound across the U.S. after a freefall in business output in the second quarter of the year as government stay-at-home orders escalated. In Michigan, the state’s gross domestic product (GDP) decline from April to June was among the worst in the nation, representing a loss of 37.6 percent on an annualized basis. 

Over the next few months, further recovery “depends on the trajectory of the virus,” said Sandy Baruah, president and CEO of the Detroit Regional Chamber. The Detroit chamber has urged businesses to require mask wearing, one sign of its support for the state’s COVID initiatives that help keep businesses open.

Baruah said  minimizing spread of the virus will help Michigan businesses hurt by the coronavirus recession to eventually rebound.

“If it stays under control, I think we’ll have a slow but steady economic recovery,” he said.  “If the virus gets out of control, there’s very likely to be a second wave of shutdowns and health crises, especially as the weather grows colder.”

That puts particular attention on how quickly COVID-related restrictions can be resolved among the Governor’s office, her administration and health officials, and the Legislature, he added.

“There has never been a more important time for a governor and a legislature to work together to keep Michiganders safe,” Baruah said. 

While awaiting state guidance following the Supreme Court ruling, some areas took their own steps on safety measures. Oakland County issued a county-wide mask mandate over the weekend. Ingham and Washtenaw counties issued four county-wide orders: mandating people continue to wear masks, limiting indoor and outdoor gatherings, keeping indoor restaurant and bar seating limited to 50 percent capacity and requiring employee health screenings. 

But the local nature of those requirements may add to the confusion.

“A patchwork scheme isn’t helpful to businesses,” said Wendy Block, vice president of business advocacy for the Michigan Chamber of Commerce. Business owners “just want to know what the rules of the game are.”

The confusion extends to customers. Johnston said he spoke to a restaurant owner whose staff was challenged over the establishment’s mask rule.

The Michigan Retailers Association saw numerous incidents in early summer over mask-related confrontations, and had to hold deescalation training for its members. On July 10, Gov. Whitmer made masks mandatory in retail settings. 

Now, said spokesperson Meegan Holland, the MRA hopes customers will understand that stores will continue to follow that guideline, even without clarity from a state or local rule.

“(We’re) working hard to educate shoppers that when they enter a store, it is the store owner’s space, so it’s their rules,” Holland said “You don’t have the right to march into a store and expect to do what you like. It’s no different than visiting a friend’s house and happily complying when you’re asked to take off your shoes. 

“If the store requires a mask, then please be respectful and follow the store owner's wishes.”

Besides masks, business owners have additional questions. Among them are their obligations to employees and whether their own COVID liability concerns will change. 

With answers still developing, most business owners are hearing simple advice: “Continue with what you’re doing,” said Block of the Michigan chamber. Licensing and worker safety regulations still apply, and businesses could still be fined under those authorities.

Michigan State Police, meanwhile, noted the MDHHS rules announced late Monday also come with enforcement: Violations are “a misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment for not more than six months and a fine of not more than $200 fine. A civil fine of up to $1,000 also is possible, according to a news release.

While the state will almost certainly face challenges to the MDHHS rules and experts provide clarity on whether executive orders remain in place, businesses can’t go wrong with continuing rules already in place, industry advocates say. Best practices, Johnston and Block said, including following the guidelines from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

The new MDHHS rules offer a slight reprieve for some businesses. Bars that make more than 30 percent of their revenue from alcohol were closed for months in Michigan under Whitmer’s orders. But the new MDHSS order says they can reopen as long as there’s no dancing and patrons remain seated six feet apart.

That won’t help some of the smaller bars, said Scott Ellis, executive director of the Michigan Licensed Beverage Association. It’s possible, he said, that some may take this window of confusion to reopen.

“Some are so desperate, they’re going to,” Ellis said. “They don’t have a choice.”

Facts matter. Trust matters. Journalism matters.

If you learned something from the story you're reading please consider supporting our work. Your donation allows us to keep our Michigan-focused reporting and analysis free and accessible to all. All donations are voluntary, but for as little as $1 you can become a member of Bridge Club and support freedom of the press in Michigan during a crucial election year.

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Donate now

Comment Form

Add new comment

Dear Reader: We value your thoughts and criticism on the articles, but insist on civility. Criticizing comments or ideas is welcome, but Bridge won’t tolerate comments that are false or defamatory or that demean, personally attack, spread hate or harmful stereotypes. Violating these standards could result in a ban.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.


middle of the mit
Mon, 10/05/2020 - 8:35pm

Why is anyone asking for clarity anymore? Doesn't the CDC have data available for these people to listen to?



WE can't trust the Feds BECAUSE the person in control is the President.

The CDC Mandates That Trump Should’ve ‘Separated Himself’ — But He Went Campaigning Instead

But He defied doctors orders and did what he wanted.

Business has been complaining from the start about them NOT being able to make money. While I wholeheartedly hear and feel sympathy AND empathy with them, they have NO such qualms with people being infected and dying under their tutelage. They feel that they can keep that under control............yet they have been bashing the Governor for her confusing orders......and now......they got what they wanted....but they are still confused about what they should do......but are also begging their republican masters to FREE THEM from liability from their customers and employees contracting the virus in their establishment. That SHOULD tell you something. It should tell you THEY KNOW their insurer ISN'T going to cover THEIR patrons OR their employees. And THEY DON'T want to be held RESPONSIBLE for anyone contracting a disease ON THEIR PREMISES......but also KNOW that people WILL contract on their premises.......but they NEED to get back to work!!

If you can't figure that out? You need to go back to middle school.

And if the press can't report the TRUTH about what the Nation is facing? You don't belong in the job that you have. You have a duty. A duty to the First Amendment. I hold that to the highest extent of what ever is left of Honor, integrity, and just giving a crap about the people.......ALL of the people..........NOT just the wealthy..........and if WE can't trust the press.................then maybe the President has it right..



Someone has to. I was hoping it would be Bridge MI.

My hope is sinking.

Why Bridge? I told you once...or more times........I am anti-conservative. Let me expand on that.


That's why I left. In MY OWN words.

John Adams often pondered the issue of civic virtue. Writing Mercy Otis Warren in 1776, he agreed with the Greeks and the Romans, that, “Public Virtue cannot exist without private, and public Virtue is the only Foundation of Republics.” Adams insisted, “There must be a positive Passion for the public good, the public Interest, Honor, Power, and Glory, established in the Minds of the People, or there can be no Republican Government, nor any real Liberty. And this public Passion must be Superior to all private Passions. Men must be ready, they must pride themselves, and be happy to sacrifice their private Pleasures, Passions, and Interests, nay their private Friendships and dearest connections, when they Stand in Competition with the Rights of society.”[27]

Adams worried that a businessman might have financial interests that conflicted with republican duty; indeed, he was especially suspicious of banks. He decided that history taught that “the Spirit of Commerce … is incompatible with that purity of Heart, and Greatness of soul which is necessary for a happy Republic.” But so much of that spirit of commerce had infected America. In New England, Adams noted, “even the Farmers and Tradesmen are addicted to Commerce.” As a result, there was “a great Danger that a Republican Government would be very factious and turbulent there.”[28]

Do you see it.........what I see?

The only question left is...........will you post the words of OUR Founding Fathers?

Tue, 10/06/2020 - 7:52am

Thanks to Shirkey and Chatfield, Michiganders won't be able to trust that Meijer, Ace Hardware, restaurants, retailers, etc. are following a consistent set of rules for keeping employees and customers safe. They'll have to decide on their own which businesses can be trusted to provide reasonably safe environments, and avoid the ones they aren't familiar with, or read or hear bad things about.

Tue, 10/06/2020 - 2:15pm

Yeah, trying to shop locally is now like playing Russian roulette. Thanks, Shirkey and Chatfield! Rural Michigan loves you forever!

Kathi Geukes
Tue, 10/06/2020 - 1:26pm

If people and businesses need to be told to stay 6 feet apart, wear a mask in public and stay home whenever possible, then they have no common sense which is the mantra of tRump's minions...."no common sense because I follow tRump!!" The "man" is an idiot and needs to be 25th immediately!!!!!

George Z
Tue, 10/06/2020 - 2:13pm

No, businesses need charity because the GOP continues to sow confusion. More bailouts, please. Who knew the GOP and Trump would be the ACTUAL socialists?

Eyes Roll
Tue, 10/06/2020 - 2:30pm

Glad do know the bar owners are happy again.

GOP Nuts
Tue, 10/06/2020 - 2:31pm

Always wondering how the GOP can create more superspreader spaces.

Tue, 10/06/2020 - 2:33pm

"'(We’re) working hard to educate shoppers that when they enter a store, it is the store owner’s space, so it’s their rules,' Holland said 'You don’t have the right to march into a store and expect to do what you like. It’s no different than visiting a friend’s house and happily complying when you’re asked to take off your shoes.'"

“'If the store requires a mask, then please be respectful and follow the store owner's wishes.'”

So businesses agree that the governor's orders were reasonable and good for business. We have more to lose in terms of lives and business if people start acting irresponsibly again.

Sat, 10/10/2020 - 7:59am

All of this new confusion is precisely why ONE person makes decisions for us all in a crisis. Imagine the next tragedy, when it's not just a clean up after, but when the moment hits and every Michigander has to wait for people like Shirkey to argue over pennies, deny any idea from a Democrat, and most importantly, make sure no solution accidentally benefits the unworthy poor.

Let's hope Governor Whitmer doesn't need to address another emergency soon, while no emergency powers are available. This yawning chasm of legislative failure will need to be addressed, but imagine a GOP legislature being proactive about this while there's a Democrat in the Governor's mansion; we have better odds of Hell freezing over.