Commercial fishing is sinking fast in Michigan. Time for more regulations?

Joel Petersen (front), a fourth-generation fisherman, unloads freshly caught Lake Michigan whitefish from the deck of the Joy, the trap net tug he operates out of Leland’s Fishtown (Bridge photo by Jim Malewitz)

LELAND — Joel Petersen steered the fishing tug Joy into the Leland River and docked it along the row of shanties of historic Fishtown.

Another light haul, the fourth-generation commercial fisherman said this month from the tug’s deck. He started to unload whitefish caught off of Lake Michigan’s Manitou islands, bringing containers to sell to the Carlson’s Fishery just feet away.

Sitting on the lake bottom, the Joy’s nets can extend up to 40-feet high. But algae weighed them down this time, shrinking the trap. The problem crops up for several weeks each summer — ever since quagga mussels invaded the Great Lakes basin from Europe more than 30 years ago and took over Lake Michigan by the 2000s. The tiny mollusks suck up all kinds of tinier underwater critters, allowing sunlight to penetrate deeper into the lakes, fueling algae growth.

“You don't catch anything until you go through this,” said Petersen, 39, and in his 27th year in the family business. “It last sometimes six weeks.”

Related: Surging Great Lakes threaten Michigan’s beloved Fishtown


Joel Petersen steers the Joy into the Leland River from Land Michigan. (Bridge video by Jim Malewitz)

The slime is one of many difficulties he and his colleagues — just 13 full-time businesses, mostly family run — face in tying their livelihoods to Great Lakes fish. They face havoc from other invasive species and market pressure from fish farms and operations outside of the Great Lakes.

And now? A push to tighten regulations and increase fees on commercial fishermen, who say it could determine whether fishing tugs still have on place on Michigan’s Great Lakes or will fade to history.

Anglers want Lansing lawmakers to place tighter curbs on commercial operations so sportfishing continues to thrive, while families like Petersen’s argue their case for existence — and to preserve Michiganders’ options for locally caught fish.

August 2019: Rising waters of Lake Michigan assault Grand Traverse coast. In photos.

Amber Mae Petersen, who runs a Muskegon fish retail outlet and is married to Joel’s cousin and business partner Eric, made her appeal to House lawmakers at a June 18 hearing.

“Commercial fishing will never reach its heyday again,” she testified. “That’s not possible, and that’s not what we’re asking. What we’re saying is: For the 13 [full-time businesses] left, let’s provide some variety to our community.”

Tightening regulations

The House Committee on Natural Resources and Outdoor Recreation kicked off the debate this month, which is expected to continue into the summer. Three bills would: increase commercial fishing license fees from around $200 to $1,400; exponentially boost fines, which haven’t changed since the 1920s, for illegally harvesting fish; and tighten reporting requirements on what fishermen catch and where they leave their nets — to prevent motor-shredding encounters with charter boats.

The reforms would also bar commercial harvests of the popular yellow perch in Lake Huron’s Saginaw Bay, exclusively reserving the dwindling population for anglers.  

“Catching fish in our water is a privilege, not a right,” Rep. Jim Lilly, R-Macatawa, said when introducing House Bill 4569, part of the package also sponsored by Reps. Jack O’Malley, R-Lake Ann, and Pauline Wendzel, R-Watervliet.


The Department of Natural Resources and angler groups back the legislation, calling it a long-needed update to a century-old commercial fishing code that keeps state officials from closely tracking and prosecuting bad behavior.

Critics fear the changes would further burden a struggling industry, crimping supplies of locally caught fish to Michigan dinner tables.

“If I look at tourism in the U.P. and I look at every single bar and restaurant that has a fish fry every Friday night — If you want to place all these restrictions on them, what’s the impact going forward?”  Rep. Sara Cambensy, D-Marquette, asked at a June 11 hearing.

“I worry about what this is going to do, especially since the number of commercial fishing outfits has gone down.”

DNR officials say they haven’t calculated the entire proposal's financial impact on commercial fishing. But taking yellow perch off the menu in the Saginaw Bay would cut the dockside value of that bay’s fishery up to 35 percent, the agency says. That’s out of $400,000 to $500,000 in fish caught there each year.

A sinking industry?

When Petersen’s family first set out on Lake Michigan more than 90 years ago, thousands of commercial fishermen worked the Great Lakes. Tens of thousands more Michiganders drew income from the industry. Within decades, overfishing, pollution and the invasion of the foreign sea lamprey and alewife nearly wiped out native fish such as lake trout. Michigan is still rehabilitating the lake trout and other game fish — through stocking and bag limits, reserving access to anglers.

Great Lakes commercial fisheries

Some 100 million pounds of fish are caught commercially throughout the Great Lakes, according to estimates from the University of Michigan.  Here’s a look at what fish are caught where:

  • Lake Erie has the largest commercial fishery in the lakes, with most coming from Canadian waters. Walleye and yellow perch are caught the most.
  • Lake Superior: Whitefish, lake trout, chub, lake herring and smelt
  • Lake Huron: Whitefish, lake trout, chub, channel catfish, carp, Pacific salmon, yellow perch and walleye.
  • Lake Michigan: Whitefish, lake trout, chub, smelt, yellow perch.
  • Lake Ontario has the smallest fishery. Harvested species include yellow perch, whitefish, bullhead and eel.

Source: Great Lakes Environmental Assessment and Mapping Project


Now, there are only 21 businesses left, according to state records. Only 13 of them make all their income from fishing, Amber Mae Petersen said. In 2017, commercial fishermen harvested about 2.5 million pounds of fish (mostly whitefish) worth $4 million.

They comprise about half the commercial fishing industry in Michigan, with Native American tribes taking in another $5 million of fish in 2017. Tribal governments have regulated their own fisheries since successfully asserting their treaty rights to fish in the 1970s. A landmark consent decree over how Michigan and five Great Lakes tribes cooperate over fishing rights  — and set quotas — expires in 2020.

The proposed rules in Lansing wouldn’t apply to tribal fisheries.

Sportfishing is big business

Both state-licensed and tribal commercial fishermen are dwarfed by Michigan's 1.1 million licensed recreational anglers. The state trails only Florida in attracting out-of-state fishing tourism. Recreational fishing in Michigan spurs $2.3 billion in commerce, the Michigan United Conservation Clubs estimates.

Nearly 40 percent of Michigan sport fishing relies on stocked fish. With the federal government, the DNR spends millions each year stocking 25 million fish in more than 1,000 locations. But anglers generate roughly $30 million per year — through state license fees and federal taxes on gear — to manage those fisheries, Bryan Burroughs, executive director of Trout Unlimited's Michigan chapter, told lawmakers.

Recreational fishing in Michigan’s Great Lakes

In 2018, anglers harvested about 1.8 million fish in Michigan’s Great Lakes waters and Lake St. Clair, according to Department of Natural Resources surveys. Here’s a look at the sports fish caught most in each lake.

  • Lake Erie: Yellow perch , walleye, channel catfish
  • Lake Superior: Coho salmon, lean lake trout, lake whitefish
  • Lake Huron: Yellow perch, walleye, lean lake trout
  • Lake Michigan: Yellow perch, chinook salmon, lean lake trout
  • Lake St. Clair: Walleye, yellow perch bluegill

Source: Michigan Department of Natural Resources

License fees on the few remaining commercial fishing businesses don’t come close to paying the $1 million to $2 million each year to manage that industry, Burroughs added.

“Recreational anglers have been paying that tab,” he said.

Angler groups point to those numbers — and ongoing ecological challenges to Great Lakes sport fish — as a reason why Michigan should go all out to protect sportsfish, including tightening oversight of commercial operations.

Brian Springstead, who owns a fishing charter service on Grand Traverse Bay, said he sympathizes with commercial fishermen but believes it’s bad policy to favor an industry squeezed by broader economic forces.

“Eventually, you have to pull the plug on the horse and carriage industry,” he said, nursing a beer at a bayside bar outside of Traverse City. “It’s the marketplace. If they had a superior product that was better tasting, people would be beating their doors down.”

Brian Springstead (right), of Traverse City, own a fishing charter service in the Grand Traverse Bay and has more than 35 years experience fishing for lake trout. “Eventually, you have to pull the plug on the horse and carriage industry,” he said of the shrinking Great Lakes commercial fishing industry. His 27-year-old son Luke (left) now leads customers on lake trout expeditions. (Bridge photo by Jim Malewitz)

Commercial fishing families say Michiganders who can’t afford their own boats would lose more than just tradition if the industry continues to decline.

“All your restaurants — you're not going to buy [Great Lakes] fish because that sports fishery can't help the restaurant,” said Denise Purvis, who handles sales and marketing for Purvis Fisheries, which harvests fish off Lake Huron’s Manitoulin Island and buys some Michigan-caught fish.

Aside from perch, farms don’t raise the most popular Great Lakes fish to eat. For folks ordering whitefish, walleye or tribal-caught lake trout in Michigan, the only question is whether it was caught on the U.S. or Canadian side of a lake, Amber Mae Petersen said.

Order one of those fish in Northern Michigan or the U.P., and it most likely came from Michigan waters, she said. Restaurateurs downstate are less guaranteed to see Michigan-caught fish on their plates.

“If we go away as a commercial fishery, your only option will be farm-raised. So anybody that's desiring wild-caught Great Lakes fish from the United States, you're going to look hard and long and far — or go catch it yourself,” Petersen said.

Following her emotional testimony Tuesday, committee chair Rep. Gary Howell, R-North Branch, said he would assemble a workgroup to hash out differences over the legislation this summer.

Paltry fines and fees

Michigan last updated fines and fees for commercial fishermen in 1928, while the value of a dollar has since increased 15-fold.  Currently, fines top out at $100 for offenses such as for keeping fish illegally. That makes prosecutors less likely to pursue charges.  

“That is not much of a disincentive if you're a fisherman landing tens of thousands of dollars worth of fish in an outing — over your licensed allocation,” Jim Dexter, the DNR fisheries chief, told lawmakers on June 11.

Recreational anglers, in contrast, face up to $500 in fines for keeping one too many fish.

Under the proposed legislation, law-breaking commercial fishermen could see fines as high as $5,000. Annual license fees would jump to $1,400 from $200, with the potential for more increases in coming years.  

The hikes would come at a time when commercial fishermen seek looser regulations.

Calls to ease up

Joel Petersen splits his time fishing outside of Leland and Muskegon. The Leland side of his business couldn’t stay afloat without a nonprofit’s subsidy; The Fishtown Preservation Society, whose mission includes preserving Michigan’s commercial fishing heritage by keeping an active operation on Fishtown’s docks, owns and maintains the Joy and its state license.

“We’re a niche fishery,” Petersen said. “We can’t catch the volumes. There’s not enough guys left. There’s not enough fishermen left, and the lake’s changing where there might not be the fish to support a fishery anymore.”

He says allowing him to keep lake trout — just those that inevitably swim into the nets he sets for far more valuable whitefish — would improve his fortunes. Petersen sees so many lake trout darting beneath Lake Michigan’s waters that he believes the fish are fully rehabilitated — and that the state needs of higher quotas.

Commercial fisherman Joel Petersen poses by the Joy, the trap net tug he operates out of Leland’s Fishtown. (Bridge photo by Jim Malewitz)

But Michigan bars commercial fishing for lake trout, and it continues to stock them for anglers.

As it stands, Petersen must throw back any lake trout caught in his nets, which often die anyway when surface water is particularly warm. Sometimes that’s very few. But in a particularly bad six-week stretch two years ago, Petersen recalls throwing back as many as 60,000 likely dead lake trout. (The DNR allows this practice and such fish do not count toward state quotas.)

“I can’t describe how awful that feeling is to see these fish floating down the lake, going away,” Petersen said.

Anglers argue commercial crews should change their practices to avoid catching trout. 

During the Legislature’s 2018 lame duck session, then-Sen. Tom Casperson, R-Escanaba, pushed a bill through the Senate that would have repealed the state’s ban on commercial lake trout harvests on Lake Superior and Lake Michigan — adding a new revenue stream for the industry.

The bill died in a House committee, but industry experts expect a similar proposal to resurface this summer.

Allowing commercial fishermen to keep lake trout in Lakes Michigan and Superior would leave fewer for recreational anglers, since a 2000 agreement with five tribes in the eastern U.P. and northern Lower Peninsula limits the state’s harvest.

In some areas, licensed anglers already have exceeded annual quotas. In the Grand Traverse Bay of Lake Michigan, the Natural Resources Commission in April approved emergency limits on anglers of just one trout per day.

But in his section of Lake Michigan, Petersen sees lake trout everywhere — maybe even scaring off whitefish, he says. He’s sick of throwing back dead lake trout.

“You can’t catch a dead fish,” he said. “So why don’t bring it in and make it available for the public?”

Facts matter. Trust matters. Journalism matters.

If you learned something from the story you're reading please consider supporting our work. Your donation allows us to keep our Michigan-focused reporting and analysis free and accessible to all. All donations are voluntary, but for as little as $1 you can become a member of Bridge Club and support freedom of the press in Michigan during a crucial election year.

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Donate now

Comment Form

Add new comment

Dear Reader: We value your thoughts and criticism on the articles, but insist on civility. Criticizing comments or ideas is welcome, but Bridge won’t tolerate comments that are false or defamatory or that demean, personally attack, spread hate or harmful stereotypes. Violating these standards could result in a ban.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.


Thu, 06/20/2019 - 7:20am

The "bills would...boost fines...for illegally harvesting fish; and tighten reporting requirements on...where they leave their nets — to prevent motor-shredding encounters with charter boats." Commercial fishermen think those are "burdens." It's a burden to operate responsibly?

Mon, 06/24/2019 - 8:45am

Read the entire passage ...
"Three bills would: increase commercial fishing license fees from around $200 to $1,400." Yes, that increase is a burden for a seasonal, mom-pop operation that likely operates on thin margins and has the threat of bad weather always present to wipe out profits earned during a small window ...

Fri, 06/21/2019 - 8:59am

You can plan a family vacation, a one-day excursion, or whatever your heart desires around all things 'Great Lakes Fisheries', past and present, at Find where these commercial fisherman sell their pull, where to find museums about the industry and lakes, and what restaurants sell locally caught fish. It's great!

Robert Ruleau III
Fri, 06/21/2019 - 9:11am

I am a seventh generation Commercial Fisherman on Lake Michigan...our family has been fishing Michigan waters since 1826, fishing since before Michigan was a State. We've weathered thru most everything imaginable, from all that nature could throw at us to the Michigan DNR playing Frankenstein with the Lakes. In 1965 Howard Tanner and the Michigan DNR decided to try and turn Mi. Great Lakes into a Sport Industry and to make that happen, Commercial Fishing had to go...we saw nearly 2000 Fishing businesses taken away by 1970...this take could not have happened under today's laws...Michigan DNR introduced exotic and unnatural species of Predator game fish into the system and completely upended its was also, in my opinion an unconstitutional take...taking from one user and giving to another, mostly for the sake of creating a bloated DNR bureaucracy....this dicing play with Nature has had some very negative impacts and some very untrue realities...the most so being the constant beating of the multi Billion Dollar value of this Sport Industry...Im here to tell you that the "Open Water" Sport fishing industry...the one that has been favored by the Michigan DNR over my Commercial Fishing industry is a tiny piece of Sport Fishing in the State of Michigan...the bulk, probably 99% of all sport fishing in Michigan is in inland lakes, streams, rivers and near shore...done by Mom, Dad and the kids...not on the open waters of the Great Lakes. The vocal Commercial Charter Sport fishers and Sport groups such as Trout Unlimited have hid behind this fact and used the bloated dollar numbers to endlessly persuade our Politicians to always vote in their favor...because they "created" so much value. It's simply not true and to place the last death stake in my industry, one that is rich in history and provides a wonderful food source to millions of people who don't catch their own fish and wish to have the ability to do so...the non-sport fishing public deserves the right to fish from their resource and Michigan Commercial Fishermen are there to see that they can...don't give up on us...

Nick Green
Mon, 06/24/2019 - 8:10am

The man who threw back 60,000 Lake Trout in one week clearly was not fishing for whitefish. These fish do not occupy the same space in the water column in those kinds of numbers. Why didn't Bridge talk to a biologist, you know, someone who knows a little something about fish behavior? They would be able to articulate that a very small percentage of bycatch is expected when appropriate commercial fishing practices are used; however, 60,000 in a week means an appropriate practice isn't being used. Instead of changing the law because it keeps being broken, why not protect the fishery and sportfish by requiring commercial anglers to responsibly operate their business.

Why are our com...
Fri, 10/18/2019 - 8:25pm

He was targeting whitefish. Why would he want to target trout, can’t keep them, daaaa. You don’t understand how commercial fishing works. You don’t know the labor that goes into placing stationary impoundment gear (trap-net) into the waters. It’s not an easy job, it’s a massive undertaking that cannot be done alone or by inexperienced persons. You just can’t pick the net up and move it, it ain’t that simple.
Anyhow, who are you to tell this fishermen how he’s going to provide for his family, that’s pretty selfish of you to want to take food out his family’s mouth. How dare you. He’s not telling you how to make a living.
Oh, and it was 60,000 fish in a 6 week period and no laws are being broken, better get your facts straight before you come after someone.

Morris Edmonds
Tue, 03/17/2020 - 8:40am

You're not a "Fisherman", you're a "Netter".
Your nonchalant, "Oh, and it was 60,000 fish in a 6 week period and no laws are being broken, better get your facts straight before you come after someone." statement proves you're incredible disregard for the fishery.
The fact that 60,000 fish were caught and thrown back into the lake mostly dead, tells me that they simply can't effectively net the species they are targeting.
They have no conscious and should not be in that business.
If I caught a species not allowed by my "Fishing" licence, I would be fined if it died.
MI Senate, pass these bills !

Gerald Barber
Mon, 06/24/2019 - 9:56am

Commercial fishing has been regulated out a long time ago ! I knew several fishermen that fish Lake Erie and was shut down 30 years ago! So it’s nothing new here ! Michigan DNR has no problem putting people out of work! Just like the ban on deer baiting! It will do nothing but cost jobs and income !

Patrick Shannon
Mon, 06/24/2019 - 12:19pm

Commercial fishing is going away like small family farming. Fresh fish and farm fresh goods continue to be needed in our restaurants and grocery stores. This move by government is nothing more than a eradication of a group of small business people. I am a sport fisherman but I still buy fresh Great Lakes fish. The other options are imported farm raised frozen fish and tilapia raised in a Milwaukee warehouse. Neither are “Pure Michigan” by any stretch of imagination.

Tom Doyle
Mon, 06/24/2019 - 4:36pm

Now before we get carried away there are some things to be considered.
First, the yellow perch industry in Lake Michigan was/is/has been decimated by overfishing by the commercial fisherman. Wisconsin, Illinois, possibly Indiana put a stop to commercial perch fishing to try build the population. Michigan finally lowered the bag limits for perch allowed to sport fisherman, they are no longer allowed to have 25 per person in the boat.
The major fishing to the Great Lakes is caused by people and industries not even on the Great Lakes. How about if the practice of emptying ballast tanks either in the St. Lawrence Seaway or the Great Lakes is stopped and jail time enforced if the Captain of the ship allows it to happen. That would have prevented mud snails, zebra mussels and other non native species from entering.
The State Legislature and the Farm Board had no qualms about attempting to push through legislation that would have allowed fish farming in the Great Lakes at the expense of native species. This was finally stopped after all involved could no longer pass the red face test.
Our former tax cutting Governor had no qualms about raising fees to offset taxes. The sport fishing industry patrons have paid out a boat load of money to help the sport fishing industry. Anything involving the sport fishing industry on the Great Lakes I am sure also helps commercial fisherman.
That are so many things wrong in this article and the screwed heads of the Michigan state legislature that they cannot all be written. How about the state hires an independent 3rd party to accurately look at the facts before the farm is given away. How about discussing commercial fishing with all of the states on the Great Lakes so that there are uniform plans? If gill netting is the problem break out the numbers and show all participants that this must stop. Does anyone seriously believe that the aboriginal residents are going to fish themselves out of existence? For that matter has anyone ever tracked how many tribes and their members are actually fishing? Common folks, start talking and leave your attitudes at the door!
For once can this state do something right!!!

Jan Lixey Hughes
Mon, 06/24/2019 - 4:51pm

My great great grandfather was commercial fishing Saginaw Bay in the 1840’s. In the great depression my grandmother and grandfather fed many in our town from their commercial fishing for free. In the 1990s my dad’s cousin sold his commercial fishing. End of an era.

Wed, 07/10/2019 - 8:06pm

I say increase commercial harvesters fees and make them more responsible. I'm tired of hearing all these operations complain about riding a sinking ship anyway(some pun intended). The multi billion dollar recreational fishing industry IS and will remain far more important than their commercial fishing operations. My family fished the Baltic Sea commercially, for far longer than these operations have been in business (try about 800 years). The fisheries crashed because of irresponsibility and mismanagement. My ancestors then came to the U.S. and did the responsible thing for their families, they got real jobs instead of taking the dying, traditional way out. Food for thought...

Fri, 10/18/2019 - 9:19pm

Our remaining commercial fishermen need to sue the State of Michigan. The Michigan DNR is point blank breaking the law of the land, the Michigan Constitution, by favoring one group over another (sport fishing over commercial fishing) and not providing just and fair rights. A portion of our State Representatives are continuing to allow this to happen and are supporting this law breaking practices. What’s so wrong with allowing our few remaining commercial fishermen the opportunity to provide Lake Trout, Walleye and Perch along with Whitefish, after all, I like to eat fish and would love to be able to eat locally caught Lake Trout, Walleye and perch instead of it coming from Canada. Let’s be fair. Let’s use our brains on this subject and think fairly.

Morris Edmonds
Tue, 03/17/2020 - 8:12am

He's not a "Fisherman", he's a "Netter" !