Michigan to sue 3M as toxic PFAS chemicals taint waters

Gov. Rick Snyder

Michigan Gov. Rick Snyder on Friday requested a lawsuit against chemical giant 3M over PFAS toxic contamination.

LANSING — Gov. Rick Snyder on Friday asked Attorney General Bill Schuette to sue 3M, the manufacturer of products laced with the chemical PFAS that is increasingly contaminating waterways in Michigan and elsewhere.

“To recover the costs incurred by the State, along with compensating for the corresponding environmental harm and public health threat, I ask that you immediately initiate a lawsuit on behalf of the State of Michigan” against the chemical giant and “all other responsible parties,” Snyder wrote to Schuette in a letter circulated Friday.

The letter is the first step in a lawsuit against the Minnesota-based corporation that makes Scotchgard and products like firefighting foam that include the chemical. By law, the attorney general must sue on behalf of the state any time the governor asks.

“He has to start preparing a lawsuit now.” said Anna Heaton, Snyder’s spokeswoman.

Now a national concern — particularly at military bases –  PFAS has been detected at 31 sites in 15 Michigan communities and counting. In some cases PFAS has seeped into drinking water.

Officially called perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances, the compounds are used in several non-stick and waterproofing substances, and are key ingredients in firefighting foam long used on military bases, airports and elsewhere.

Early research suggests PFAS compounds may be linked to developmental and behavioral problems for infants and children, hormonal problems and even certain cancers. A growing number of military veterans and others who believe they were exposed to PFAS are wondering if the chemicals triggered their health problems.

In his letter to Schuette, Snyder wrote PFAS in Michigan waters “are directly attributable to the products 3M designed, manufactured, marketed and sold since the 1960s,” including Scotchgard and firefighting foams known as AFFF and AR-AFFF.

“It is generally understood that 3M was aware of the nature of its products and the threats they posed to public health,” Snyder wrote.

“Despite this knowledge, 3M continued to manufacture, market and sell its products containing the contaminant without disclosing to its customers and regulatory agencies the threat they posed to the general public.”

Lauren Houck, a spokeswoman for Schuette, said:  “We have received the letter and we are reviewing it.”

3M defended its environmental record.

"3M cares deeply about the safety and health of Michigan’s communities," the company said in an emailed statement Friday. "3M acted responsibly at all times in connection with products containing PFOS, PFOA and AFFF, and will vigorously defend its record of environmental stewardship.”

Snyder’s maneuver comes as environmentalists and residents of affected communities are criticizing the state for not addressing the problem sooner.

A Department of Environmental Quality researcher documented his PFAS concerns in a 2012 research paper that initially drew a tepid response from his bosses.

Snyder’s office has pushed back against those criticisms and sought to highlight the state’s efforts over the past year.

Snyder formed a multi-agency “Michigan PFAS Action Response Team last November, and the Legislature appropriated more than $23 million for the PFAS response a month later. And the DEQ started testing all public water systems and schools that tap well water for the chemicals.

Michigan also sued Wolverine Worldwide, known for its Hush Puppies shoes, following revelations that toxic chemicals leached from the dumping sites in Kent County. The state has also provide alternate water supplies in some communities.

Wolverine also has said 3M bears some responsibility for that contamination because it manufactured the toxic chemical used to make shoes. Wolverine welcomed Snyder's move Friday. 

"3M created, made, marketed, and sold Scotchgard to millions of consumers and thousands of businesses for decades, and Wolverine continues to believe that 3M should acknowledge its responsibilities and be involved in solutions," the company said in a statement.

In June, New York sued 3M and five other companies over the chemical contamination, and 3M this year paid $850 million to settle a lawsuit with Minnesota in the state’s biggest environmental lawsuit in history.

Facts matter. Trust matters. Journalism matters.

If you learned something from the story you're reading please consider supporting our work. Your donation allows us to keep our Michigan-focused reporting and analysis free and accessible to all. All donations are voluntary, but for as little as $1 you can become a member of Bridge Club and support freedom of the press in Michigan during a crucial election year.

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Donate now

Comment Form

Add new comment

Dear Reader: We value your thoughts and criticism on the articles, but insist on civility. Criticizing comments or ideas is welcome, but Bridge won’t tolerate comments that are false or defamatory or that demean, personally attack, spread hate or harmful stereotypes. Violating these standards could result in a ban.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.


Mon, 07/16/2018 - 10:36am

Snyder: "3M was aware of the nature of its products and the threats they posed to public health." The same can be said of Michigan chemical manufacturers. If Snyder thinks 3M should be held accountable because its products are hazardous, even when used as intended, shouldn't he advocate suing Michigan chemical companies? Or is he going after 3M only because PFAS is in the news, and he's looking for an easy way to improve his image?

Stanley Gay
Wed, 10/31/2018 - 4:23pm

WOW, Why Now GOVERNOR Snyder ? Could IT POSSIBLY BE because it's ELECTION TIME ????? CLEAN DRINKING WATER Up until NOW hasn't been VERY BIG on your LIST of PRIORITIES !!!!!