Michigan minimum wage, sick leave bills dismantled. Will Gov. Snyder sign?

July 17: Michigan Supreme Court hears debate on minimum wage, sick leave laws
Feb. 19: GOP lawmakers want Michigan Supreme Court to rule on minimum wage, sick leave
Feb. 13: AG Dana Nessel may review Michigan minimum wage, sick leave law
Dec. 14: Snyder signs bills that weaken Michigan minimum wage, sick leave law

The GOP-controlled Legislature voted Tuesday to dismantle citizen-initiated bills to raise Michigan’s minimum wage and require employers to offer paid sick leave, moving the bills closer to Gov. Rick Snyder’s desk.

The versions adopted by legislative Republicans by 60-48 margins — mostly along party lines — roll back the language as written and signed by hundreds of thousands of Michigan voters on the wage and sick leave efforts in a bid to make the Nov. 6 ballot. Critics slammed the move because the GOP preemptively passed the laws in September so they could defang them in the legislature’s lame-duck session.

Three Republicans — Reps. Joseph Bellino, of Monroe; Martin Howrylak, of Troy; and Jeff Yaroch, of Richmond — joined Democrats in voting against the bills.

Dec. 21: That's a wrap! What bills passed, died in Michigan lame duck for the ages
Related: Michigan power grabs, pipelines and pot: What we’re tracking in lame duck
Related: In lame duck, all eyes are on Michigan Gov. Rick Snyder

The House made some last-minute changes to both bills before passing them, in what House Republicans described as negotiations between legislative leaders and Snyder’s administration. The Senate voted in the changes Tuesday evening, sending the bills to Snyder’s desk.

It’s unclear whether Snyder, who will be replaced by Democrat Gretchen Whitmer in January, would sign either bill. His office has said only that the governor considers bills on their individual merit.

Protesters gathered in the Michigan Capitol on Tuesday as the House and Senate met in session, urging lawmakers to vote against bills to scale back minimum wage and paid sick leave laws. (Bridge photo by Lindsay VanHulle)

Senate Majority Leader Arlan Meekhof, R-West Olive, told reporters Tuesday night that he is confident Snyder will sign the bills because “he said so,” though Snyder spokesman Ari Adler downplayed the talks.

Any bills not adopted by the end of this month are considered dead and will have to be reintroduced in January.

Tuesday’s votes capped a dramatic day at the Capitol, as the Legislature enters the second week of its four-week lame-duck session, the period between the Nov. 6 election and the end of the two-year term in December.

Aside from the wage and benefits issues, Tuesday was marked by a heated committee meeting over a bill that would allow the Legislature to intervene in lawsuits and controversy over bills that would expand environmental deregulation.

Protesters gathered in the rotunda, their chants against the minimum wage and sick leave changes — “Leave your hands off our bills!” — audible from inside the House chambers. At one point, a man was overheard saying he wanted to launch a ballot drive to do away with lame-duck voting.

Earlier Tuesday, Republicans in a House committee voted down amendments to the minimum wage and sick leave bills offered by Democrats, including to require the Legislature to abide by the same wage and benefits provisions as in the bills, before voting along party lines to send it to the floor for a final vote.

And analysts with the nonpartisan House Fiscal Agency projected that a proposal to slow down the march of Michigan’s minimum wage to $12 an hour would cause more people to be eligible for Medicaid and state cash assistance.

Concerned about that and other implications for Michigan workers, Democrats urged their Republican colleagues Tuesday not to pass them.

“Regardless of which side of the aisle you sit on, or the economic policies that guide your decisions, all of us were sent here to do one thing above all else: Represent the people of Michigan to the best of our abilities. And the fact of the matter is, the people have already spoken on this matter,” said Rep. Erika Geiss, D-Taylor.

A woman holds up a sign that reads “Lame Duck = Voter Suppression” in the hallway after a House committee meeting Tuesday in which lawmakers voted along party lines to send bills to a floor vote that would scale back citizen initiatives to raise the minimum wage and require employers to offer paid sick leave. (Bridge photo by Lindsay VanHulle)

Business groups have fought the measures — and opponents note the initiatives were heavily funded by out-of-state liberal interest groups who paid for signatures.

The backers of the sick leave proposal, for instance, raised $2.5 million — and only $10 came from a Michigan resident. Almost all the money for the effort came from Washington D.C.-based groups.

Andy Johnston, vice president of government and corporate affairs for the Grand Rapids Area Chamber of Commerce, told Bridge Magazine the majority of the group’s members already provide time off for illness and “are staring in the face of a lot of additional costs of compliance.”

“Both (bills) are overly burdensome” Johnston said.

“To try to create a paid sick leave law that’s going to be workable for Michigan is the whole goal behind this legislation, and the same with minimum wage.”

People on both sides of the wage and benefits issues claimed the other side has been unwilling to negotiate.

“We are willing to sit down, but we’re also not going to compromise on what workers really need,” said Danielle Atkinson, one of the organizers of the MI Time to Care committee, which pushed the sick leave petition and this week filed a petition with the state to run another ballot drive in 2020.

Mike Shirkey, the incoming Republican Senate majority leader from Clarklake who sponsored the sick leave bill, told Bridge: “It wasn’t this mystery that we were going to amend it after we enacted it. And yet, to my recollection, we have not been contacted by one member of this organized group to talk about the kinds of changes that I think — that we believe — are necessary.”

Fueling the fire is the possibility of future litigation should the bills be adopted and signed into law. Republican Attorney General Bill Schuette on Monday issued a legal opinion asserting the Legislature’s ability to amend citizen-initiated laws it adopts in the same session.

Schuette’s opinion is a counterpunch to a 1964 opinion from then-Attorney General Frank Kelley, who asserted the opposite.

Advocates for preserving both laws as written point to the Kelley opinion as the basis for their argument that the GOP’s actions are unconstitutional.

Minimum wage slowdown

Senate Bill 1171 as amended by the House would raise Michigan’s minimum wage from $9.25 this year to $9.45 on Jan. 1, instead of to $10 under the citizen initiative.

After next year, the bill as introduced by state Sen. Dave Hildenbrand, R-Lowell, would have raised the minimum hourly wage by 23 cents per year until it equaled  $12, which should happen by 2030. That’s a far longer timeline than contemplated by the citizen initiative, which would have reached $12 by 2022, eight years earlier.

The House’s changes Tuesday would take the full minimum wage to $12.05 in 2030 instead of $12, reflecting changes Snyder’s administration requested, said Gideon D’Assandro, a spokesman for House Republicans.

Hildenbrand’s bill also strips a provision to increase the minimum wage by inflation each year after the rate tops out at $12.05.

House Fiscal Agency analysts projected that workers who earn the minimum wage actually would earn less under the Senate bill by 2030 than they would have under the citizen-initiated version because inflation would have brought the raise to $14.16 that same year.

The Republican lame-duck bill also restores the tipped wage paid to workers who collect tips as part of their jobs, which is currently 38 percent of the full minimum wage, or $3.52 per hour. That generally applies to restaurant servers, who are among the biggest proponents of raising the wage.

The citizen-backed law, if allowed to take effect, would have gradually raise dthe tipped wage until it equaled the full minimum wage rate.

Hildenbrand’s bill instead would preserve the tipped wage as 38 percent of the full minimum wage in a given year under House changes adopted Tuesday, rather than raise it by a fixed amount annually. Critics said Hildenbrand’s original bill would have caused tipped workers to earn less as a percentage of the full minimum wage than they do today.

Slowing down the rate of wage growth “would increase public assistance caseloads and expenditures, as an individual’s earned income directly affects an individual’s eligibility and the cash assistance benefit amount,” House fiscal analysts wrote.

They estimated that reduced wages would lead to a less than 1 percent increase in the amount of eligible Medicaid beneficiaries and a $14 million increase in Medicaid costs in the 2019 fiscal year ($2.7 million of that cost would come from the state’s general fund). Costs would continue to increase annually.

Tracy Pease, a restaurant server from suburban Detroit, told a House panel Tuesday morning that there’s no law requiring customers to tip their wait staff.

And while employers are required to pay the difference if a server doesn’t earn enough through tips to make the full minimum wage, Pease said restaurant operators could choose to cut servers’ hours to compensate if business isn’t strong.

“What was the reason for passing this bill (in September) if it was so bad?” Pease said.

Hildenbrand, in his House committee testimony, said wages should be set by the marketplace and in agreements between employees and employers, not by government mandates.

He said his bill is an attempt at a solution that recognizes minimum wage increases are important to many Michiganders, while also keeping the tipped wage that is important to the restaurant industry.

State Rep. Laura Cox, R-Livonia, said in a speech on the House floor that the minimum wage law, without changes, would upend the balance sheets of Michigan small businesses and actually cause more harm than good to the workers it purports to help.

Small businesses “will be forced out of business under the proposal as written. That means people will land in the unemployment line,” Cox said. “Michigan’s economy is coming back, and workers are able to provide for their families again. We can’t turn back now.”

The restaurant industry says the tipped wage is vital to the sector, and that its elimination would force restaurants that already operate on thin profit margins to cut costs in other ways. That could lead to higher menu prices, fewer hours for servers or doing away with tipping altogether.

“Repealing the tip credit goes against what tipped employees want,” said Robert O’Meara, vice president of government affairs for the Michigan Restaurant & Lodging Association, in his House committee testimony. He cited efforts in Maine and in Washington, D.C., that reinstated the tipped wage after citizen efforts to eliminate it.

Sick leave changes

Senate Bill 1175 would amend the citizen-backed sick leave law in an effort to give more flexibility to employers to offer sick time to their employees.

Among the House changes made Tuesday to the sick leave bill, employees would be able to accrue leave time immediately and be able to use it within 90 days, similar to what was in the citizen-initiated law.

Employees also would be able to accrue one hour of leave time for every 35 hours worked, rather than 40; the citizen law would have allowed for one hour for every 30 hours worked. And employers must offer up to 40 hours of sick leave per year, rather than 36 hours in the original bill; the citizen law required 72 hours.

Notably, the Republican sick leave law no longer would apply to businesses with fewer than 50 employees. Before the exemption was introduced last week, the citizen-backed law required businesses with fewer than 10 employees to offer at least 40 hours of paid sick leave, with another 32 hours of unpaid leave.

Wendy Block, vice president of business advocacy for the Michigan Chamber of Commerce, testified the Republican lame-duck changes will help employers by aligning with federal laws that exempt small employers and allow companies to continue to offer employees a pool of paid time off that employees can use for vacation, personal use or to recover from illness.

The changes, Block said, “represent the real-world input and concerns of job providers across our state.”

Shirkey, the sick leave bill sponsor, owns Orbitform LLC, a Jackson-based company that makes assembly machines for manufacturers. He said most of his firm’s roughly 110 employees are full time, and qualify for paid time off that employees can use for vacation and unscheduled events, including illness.

Employees can earn up to four weeks off per year, based on how long they’ve worked for Orbitform, he said.

“I believe most employers, particularly in today’s competitive markets, do the same thing,” said Shirkey, whose business would be required to comply with the law.

The bill, he added, “is and remains an honest attempt to meet the spirit and intent of the statute.”

Yet Peter Ruark, a senior policy analyst for the Michigan League for Public Policy, which advocates for policies that support vulnerable residents, said the bill would not extend sick leave protections to more than half of Michiganders, many of whom work for small companies.

That estimate is based on data from Brandeis University about the percentage of working adults who are eligible for unpaid leave under the federal Family and Medical Leave Act by state. Ruark said the data is applicable because the Senate bill models its exemption for small businesses on the FMLA definition.

“You’re basically at status quo for a lot of the lowest-wage workers,” Ruark told Bridge.

“The way not to (change) it would be to just declare more than half of the workforce ineligible. And that, to me, is the worst thing about this.”

Facts matter. Trust matters. Journalism matters.

If you learned something from the story you're reading please consider supporting our work. Your donation allows us to keep our Michigan-focused reporting and analysis free and accessible to all. All donations are voluntary, but for as little as $1 you can become a member of Bridge Club and support freedom of the press in Michigan during a crucial election year.

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Donate now

Comment Form

Add new comment

Dear Reader: We value your thoughts and criticism on the articles, but insist on civility. Criticizing comments or ideas is welcome, but Bridge won’t tolerate comments that are false or defamatory or that demean, personally attack, spread hate or harmful stereotypes. Violating these standards could result in a ban.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.


Joan M McComber
Wed, 12/05/2018 - 1:00am

The truly sad thing about this bill is that Republicans refuse to acknowledge that raising wages and benefits to livable levels are the real basis for reducing the need for welfare and Medicaid. Michiganders need to know their legislature considers them to be important pieces of our collective prosperity. Passing the original bill only so they can dismantle it in the lame-duck session is dishonest, and beneficial to no one trying to make a decent living. It is simply shameful.

Wed, 12/05/2018 - 11:45am

The Republican Party at the state and federal level could care less about ordinary people. Big corporations and the wealthy are who they listen to. And whatever they say and want the GOP obediently does. Every time.

The GOP really doesn't even care about our democracy, free elections and voting. They'd like to engineer a one party system that would eliminate any input from real people.

Chad Edington
Wed, 12/05/2018 - 11:32am

It was passed in an attempt to sway voters in the mid terms. That's politics! These bills would be detrimental to small business, at least the revised version may help a few more people keep their jobs. Rich people are always going to be rich. No legislation will ever change that. They will fire people to maintain their style of living. So people can complain all they want but a the end of the day a little is still more than nothing.

Wed, 12/05/2018 - 9:55pm

Slaves bought into that mindset, too. Ever hear of economic slavery? Coming to a town near you.

Thomas E Graham
Wed, 12/05/2018 - 3:16pm

The rational voter myth is why Alexandria Occasio Cortex got elected.
Raising the minimum wage and forcing paid leave harms unskilled workers and destroys small businesses.
We need a graduated minimum wage.
Walmart can pay the highest tier
Companies with 100 or more employees can pay the next middle tier
Companies with fewer than 100 employees should have no minimum wage.

Wed, 12/05/2018 - 8:13pm

If the minimum wage harms unskilled workers, (marginally productive employees), what difference does it make how many employees a business has?

Thu, 12/06/2018 - 1:28pm

They need to raise the minimum wage quicker than 2030, so people do not have to work 2 and 3 jobs just to survive. Every thing is going up whether they raise it or not anyways. Rent, food, gas and car insurance is already high. Also daycare is expensive . Kids are either being raised by other people other than there parents or left alone because they have to work more than 40 hours a week because wages are so low. I am a educated Medical Assistant and can barely survive because everything cost so much and pay is so low. In a doctors office most of them only pay between $10.00 to $11.00 an hour. On top of that you have to pay for your own health insurance, daycare, car insurance, gas, food and rent. Also student loan and clothes, shoes, utilities and garbage. Wages are way too low even with a education because everything just keeps going up but the wages don't

Thu, 12/06/2018 - 9:28pm

I work my ass off for minimum wage, 40 hrs a week. I can't even afford basic things like clothing, I can barely afford food, and certainly can't afford health insurance. I've been saving up for a $250 mattress for almost a year (been sleeping on three floor for a long time). The state tells me that I earn too much money for food stamps or government health issuance. This place is absolutely ridiculous. the price of everything keeps going up, but never my wages. No matter how hard you try these crooked politicians gotta keep you down.

Fri, 12/07/2018 - 10:35am

Where the heck do you live? I see signs everywhere I drive for between $11 to $15 per hour. It sounds like a minimum wage job is your choice!

Broken Citizen
Thu, 12/06/2018 - 9:19pm

By 2030 I'll be living in goddamn cardboard box next to a dumpster if this is his this is going down. fucking crooks only care about their own pockets.

Fri, 12/07/2018 - 10:38am

In our world you working a minimum wage job is your choice. In that case you're probably right!

Fri, 12/07/2018 - 10:24am

The only reason that employees would lose their jobs if minimum wage was raised is if there was less business to the business owner. If an employer has more employees than are necessary to provide his services or product then he is a poor businessman. A well paid employee spends his extra wages, thus increasing business for everyone unlike the current minimum wage employee who cannot even afford necessities. Think about it: the "job creators" are really those customers a business serves. Without them, there is no necessity for that business to exist.

Larry Andreano
Sat, 12/08/2018 - 10:32am

There is absolutely no reason to have a minimum wage. Heck every fast food place in town pays more than the minimum wage as it is - proving that competition is what works best. All a minimum wage does is force employers to automate as much as possible reducing employment opportunities for low skilled folks - which eliminates the opportunity for those folks to get a job and develop good marketable skills and improve their situation.

Fri, 12/21/2018 - 11:24am

Kind of bitting the hand that would bring in more revenue to the State,,,increase in wages +more taxes to the state!Michigan is number 2 in corrupted States out of 15 .www.wsj.com
Also congress is not FUNDINg for Libraries.Now that we voted for in increase
WE /bridge Magazine need to publish
The State of Michigan General Budget.
The Rainy Day Budget
and the State Budget :so taxpayers know where is our money going/coming.
Also reduce the salary from TOP ...from$ 330 000 back to $ 154 000 see Andy Dillon>

diane lafata
Sun, 12/30/2018 - 10:32am