Michigan police defend surplus military gear, as debate about force grows

Michigan police agencies used to have 13 tracked vehicles, a type of armored vehicle with belts instead of wheels. Obtained through a federal program, the vehicles were destroyed in northern Michigan in 2015 after President Obama curtailed the program. President Trump has since reversed Obama’s policy. (Photo courtesy Larry Goerge)

Civil unrest about police brutality nationwide has reinvigorated debate about “demilitarizing” law enforcement agencies, some of whom are equipped with armored trucks and weapons reminiscent of the military. 

Protesters who encounter riot gear, military-style weapons and armored vehicles employed at demonstrations say they’re further evidence of claims that police are a force for control rather than community service and protection. 

Trische’ Duckworth, who has organized protests in Washtenaw County and is executive director of the community advocacy group Survivors Speak, told Bridge that arming police with military-grade equipment gives the public the impression officers have a “superiority complex.”

“A lot of the reasons that we’re seeing what we’re seeing [with police brutality] is because police feel that they’re superior over an average citizen. That mindset alone is very dangerous in society,” Duckworth said. “Couple that with giving them a military weapon — it’s just not a good look.”

Cataloguing all Michigan police paramilitary equipment is a challenge because it’s typically purchased through local budgets or federal grants. 

But one federal program, which sends extra or obsolete military equipment to local law enforcement, has sent more than $7 billion in excess military equipment to 8,000 police agencies nationwide. Of those, at least $45.8 million worth of equipment has gone to at least 273 Michigan police departments.

President Obama curtailed the Law Enforcement Support Office program, commonly known as the 1033 program, but President Trump has reversed those restrictions. Now, a bipartisan group of lawmakers in Congress is pushing to change or shut down the program. 

The program is the source of riot shields and other equipment in Clayton Township, a community of 7,000 outside of Flint. Township Police Sgt. Troy Belanger said he ordered the gear in 2019 in case the force needs to protect the Flint Islamic Center. 

“When things happen internationally there have been threats on that building,” Belanger said. “You never know who may come out of the woodwork.”

In Michigan, federal records show the program provided: 

  • 35 agencies with one mine-resistant vehicle, including police in Battle Creek, West Bloomfield, Troy and sheriff’s in Kent, Oakland and Macomb County.
  • 40 unmanned ground vehicles, essentially large robots, worth $2.2 million. 
  • 11 armored trucks and 89 utility trucks worth nearly $7 million.
  • Nearly 3,000 semi- or fully-automatic rifles worth $1.2 million. 
  • Three helicopters worth more than $2 million combined to the Michigan State Police and two helicopters worth nearly $300,000 combined to the Detroit Police Department.

Thousands of rain-proof blankets, hundreds of elastic bandages, and dozens of boots, computers, gloves, office chairs and tables and cots.

Several larger departments, including the Detroit Police Department and Macomb and Kent County Sheriff’s offices, could not be reached for interviews. 

Officials in none of the departments that spoke with Bridge — including small agencies like Clayton Township and large ones like the Oakland and Wayne County Sheriff's office — said they’d used their equipment during recent protests. 


Kenneth Lowande,a political science professor at the University of Michigan who has studied the program, said it is responsible for a small portion of the weapons and equipment used by police that cause some to view them as “militarized.”

The federal program likely “contributes to militarization, but it contributes to a lot of other things too. It’s sort of like a Goodwill for police departments,” he said.

Indeed, among the most-transferred items to Michigan police departments are wet weather poncho liners (essentially a rain-proof blanket), elastic bandage kits, life jackets, cots, tape, flashlights and binoculars. Rifles, pistols, trucks and “non-lethal firing devices” (which usually refers to Tasers) also are also among the most-transferred.

Police who spoke with Bridge said they primarily use the program to save money by picking up necessary supplies for free. 

Several departments that have received large amounts of equipment serve smaller communities such as South Haven, Grosse Pointe Farms and Lowell. Some larger departments including Grand Rapids and Lansing have received very little.

A note about the data

The available data on the 1033 program likely represent a portion of the equipment sent to local police departments through the program, said Kenneth Lowande of the University of Michigan. The U.S. Department of Defense began archiving records of transfers in 2014, and most agencies only retain transfer records for up to five years themselves. That means that the records from before 2014 probably indicate only what the agencies had records of at that time. The data also are limited because agencies sometimes destroy or sell equipment they can’t use.

Oakland County Sheriff Michael Bouchard said his department uses the mine-resistant vehicle from the program two or three times a year.

The vehicle is used to transfer hostages or officers during active shooter or barricaded gunman situations. He likened the vehicle to “a big safe box” that wouldn’t be appropriate to bring to a protest unless there’s “a risk to life and property.”

In southwest Michigan, the Niles Police Department received a mine-resistant vehicle through the program in 2016. It’s only been used once: to help a neighboring county evacuate people from a trailer park where a shooter had barricaded themselves.

The department holds on to it “for the threat of an act of violence” like a mass shooting, said James Millin, police chief of the city of 11,000 residents. 

“We proudly and gladly say that we have not had cause to use it that often, but that doesn’t make it any less important,” Millin said. “So the people that say you can’t really justify it… I disagree. If it gives us the ability to save one person’s life, then it’s well worth the money. Which to the City of Niles is nothing.”

Tristan Taylor, a leader of Detroit protests against racism and police brutality, said it is easy for police to justify the equipment’s use in emergencies but harder for them to explain how it is used in cities with large populations of people of color.

“We do see [military-style equipment] coming out all too often to maintain peace. Not just against protesters, but in a heavy handed way against people who have minor offenses,” Taylor said. 

“It’s striking to me how much patience police can give to white people even when they’re holding hostages than Black and brown people that they just pull over for a random traffic stop.” 

He said, too often, police resolve conflicts not with “discussions but by saying to Black and brown bodies, and anyone else who dares challenge their authority, ‘our guns are bigger.’”

A program under the microscope

The federal 1033 program began in 1997, shortly after two bank robbers in North Hollywood got into a shootout with the Los Angeles Police Department. Officers found themselves out-gunned and had to take cover for nearly 45 minutes while they awaited help from a SWAT team. 

It inspired agencies across the country to consider stocking up on higher-caliber weapons so they wouldn’t have to wait if caught in a similar situation, Lowande of U-M said. 

The program got little attention until the 2014 protests in Ferguson, Missouri, after a white police officer shot and killed 18-year-old Michael Brown. 

Videos of police with armored vehicles, combat gear and assault rifles — most of which was not obtained through the 1033 program — sparked backlash against the program. Critics contended it was contributing to militarization that harms police relationships with communities. 

Some, including former U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions, have cited studies indicating that police having military equipment reduces crime rates, assaults on police officers and complaints against them. Lowande and his student Ayse Eldes argued those studies are based on flawed data and methods and have not been able to be replicated by other researchers. 

The Libertarian-leaning Charles Koch Institute has cited statistics suggesting that certain types of military equipment result in reduced crime rates but increased use of force by police against civilians. A 2017 study also indicated the receipt of more military equipment is associated with a higher number of police killings of civilians.

Recent research from Princeton University on SWAT teams indicates that militarized teams are more frequently deployed in communities of color, even after controlling for crime rates, and that creating more SWAT teams and sending them out more often did not significantly affect crime rates or officer safety. The Princeton researcher also found that images of militarized police units in news reports damages public opinion toward law enforcement. 

Obama curtailed the 1033 program after the Ferguson protests in 2015, barring and recalling tracked vehicles (armored vehicles that may look like tanks), grenade launchers, bayonets and other equipment. 

Larry Goerge, the 1033 program coordinator for Michigan, said state agencies didn’t have many of the items Obama banned. But the state once had 13 tracked armored vehicles. 

“We took them all up to Camp Grayling, put them on a target range and blew them up,” he said. 

Trump reversed Obama’s order in 2017, but by then, much of that equipment had been permanently destroyed. 

Now, Goerge said, those tracked vehicles are hard to get — agencies have to justify why they want the equipment, and none in Michigan would likely qualify. Records indicate that other recalled items have not been sent back to Michigan agencies since Trump reversed the order. 

There also hasn’t been an uptick in requests for equipment since the protests against racism and police brutality began in late May, Goerge said. 

In fact, requests have been down for most of the year due to the coronavirus; departments aren’t allowing officers to travel to pick up property, have reduced staff or are focusing on other priorities. 

“There isn’t anything [police departments are] receiving through us that they wouldn’t have the ability to buy on their own” with enough funding, Goerge said. “To say it’s the militarization of police departments I feel is unfair. We are assisting departments covering some of their budget shortfalls.”

But Lowande said that for activists who are concerned with militarization, this is one of few reform areas with the potential for immediate, top-down change. 

“Tomorrow Congress or the president could decide to enact major reforms and take away a lot of this equipment. The effects would be almost immediate,” Lowande said. “Nothing else that I’ve seen that people are talking about as possible reforms have that straightforward an implementation.”

Facts matter. Trust matters. Journalism matters.

If you learned something from the story you're reading please consider supporting our work. Your donation allows us to keep our Michigan-focused reporting and analysis free and accessible to all. All donations are voluntary, but for as little as $1 you can become a member of Bridge Club and support freedom of the press in Michigan during a crucial election year.

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Donate now

Comment Form

Add new comment

Dear Reader: We value your thoughts and criticism on the articles, but insist on civility. Criticizing comments or ideas is welcome, but Bridge won’t tolerate comments that are false or defamatory or that demean, personally attack, spread hate or harmful stereotypes. Violating these standards could result in a ban.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.


Mon, 06/29/2020 - 8:50am

Just don't resist arrest!

That is it. Everything that is going on now started with someone resisting arrest.

Speak Up!
Mon, 06/29/2020 - 10:08am

That's just not what the facts show. Police are killing people who are not resisting, but since when did we decide that police in the US are prosecutors, judges, and executioners? That's how they operate in countries with authoritarian leaders, like Duterte in the Philippines. Are you one of those people who like authoritarianism or limited government?

Mon, 06/29/2020 - 12:24pm

DS you are wrong.....
Police overreacting is the problem. Citizens all have rights.

Mon, 06/29/2020 - 12:25pm

This is an incredibly ignorant comment. Tons of people get killed by police without resisting. And resisting is not justification to shoot someone or kneel on their neck for nearly 10 mins. The problem that is going on is police are not held accountable and sociopaths and ignorant people defend them. This is undeniable when in every other civilized country police kill 0-12 people a year. In America we kill over 400. We kill more people in the US in a week then any European country hits in a year. These are just the facts and you cant argue with them, so you stick to sqwuaaaaking points about resisting arrest and other propaganda that shows you are not aware of actual facts like data.

I can also with 1 name show how asinine and childish your post is. Breonna Taylor. She was not even given a chance to resist in the first place.

Mon, 06/29/2020 - 3:12pm

Who is defending the police then? City council members, and mayors, correct? So you're maybe correct on the "type" of ppl defending them. Interesting to talk "facts and data" after stating "tons of...". Agree resisting in and of itself is not justification, however, it certainly gives greater possibility of escalation. True Taylor didn't get to resist. Her BF 1st shot officer leading to her being shot from return fire. From what I understand police did not announce themselves which they should have. Not faulting her BF as i believe he thought it was intruder breaking thru door. Disagree that your example has anything to do with the point we're trying to make.

Tue, 06/30/2020 - 9:24am

Breonna Taylor was murdered in her own home by police who were executing a no-knock raid. George Floyd was in handcuffs and in police custody before being thrown to the ground and murdered.

George Hagenauer
Mon, 06/29/2020 - 9:32am

Thanks for providing some clarity to the issue- you'll note a Washtenaw activist raising the issue and also that neither Ann Arbor nor Ypsilanti nor Washtenaw County are listed with any material received. It is also nice to be able to sort out between major aggressive military equipment and softer material like radios ponchos etc.

Mon, 06/29/2020 - 10:10am

Washtenaw, btw, also handled the pandemic much better than other metro Detroit counties.

A Yooper
Mon, 06/29/2020 - 9:43am

Get rid of this stuff.
We don't need military equipment of this type for local police departments.
They seem to do a good job of addressing large gatherings with tear gas and flash grenades as it is.

Mon, 06/29/2020 - 3:22pm

Disagree. Not in love with the idea of some military equipment, but can also see instances that is helpful or even needed.

Jim Wittebols
Mon, 06/29/2020 - 9:51am

I have seen several reports now that rather uncritically refer to "excess" equipment. If there is excess in the DOD then it shouldn't have been made in the first place. Ratchet down the military spending drastically and this all goes away.

Mon, 06/29/2020 - 3:24pm

Just like a snap of the fingers? Not following the logic.

DOD Fleeces US
Wed, 07/01/2020 - 4:25am

Jim, I agree, give us back our taxes or spend the money on other things like pandemic preparedness. We are such a laughingstock in the world.

Mon, 06/29/2020 - 11:17am

The military equipment used in Standing Rock against the pipeline protestors was insane. I saw a bunch of tanks, went through checkpoints manned by officers with automatic rifles, and was regularly annoyed by drones. It made me understand indigenous peoples distrust of our government. I saw the police in Ypsilanti in 2017 show up in riot gear for a BLM protest. It was stupid. The BLM folks were a group of students from Eastern who were totally peaceful. Police militarization is bad for society. Thanks for the article.

Mon, 06/29/2020 - 3:39pm

I get your point on Ypsilanti, but showing up to protest in protective gear isn't stupid at all. Poor choices are generally what is bad for society.

Frances L Pierce
Mon, 06/29/2020 - 5:39pm

The article on Demilitarizing the Police is very well-written and well-researched. This over-arming of police has been a problem in many areas and, I feel sure, exacerbates the feelings that the police are out to hurt citizens, not help them!
But let's not forget that the reason why police have believed they NEED to increase their armaments is that there has been such a huge increase in military-type weapons on the streets being owned and used by ordinary people, many of whom use them for criminal acts. The fear of being confronted by an AR-15 or other weapon designed only to kill human beings, has caused many police departments to invest in or accept from the government weapons that are even bigger and more lethal! It is inevitable that as more lethal guns reach the streets, the police will continue to ratchet-up their use of bigger guns, too!
Let's start addressing this issue at the ground level - get the big guns off our streets!!

Tue, 06/30/2020 - 9:51am

The asymmetry of force provided by military surplus has little to do with civilians owning armalites. Rather, it's a result of the military industrial complex bribing our politicians into ordering obscene quantities of weapons which are used to wage endless war abroad before being brought home to be used against the civillian populace

Mon, 06/29/2020 - 9:07pm

Under the current situation,,yes, the police need this equipment!

Tue, 06/30/2020 - 7:10am

Well apparently my posts were banned for some reason. No problem. Bridge was given a donation by me. Ban my views I'll ban my future donations to you're cause. First donation becomes last. Good luck with you're slanted view of the world.

Gary Lea
Tue, 06/30/2020 - 9:11am

Well, yeah, my impression is that tracked vehicles in particular not only require costly maintenance, but meet the 'law of the instrument;' that is, as Abraham Maslow said in 1966, "I suppose it is tempting, if the only tool you have is a hammer, to treat everything as if it were a nail."
Soon, Cybertruck (with law-enforcement modifications) can reduce department budgets while increasing (hopefully favorable) public awareness.

Sat, 07/04/2020 - 11:41am

What happened to policeman walking the beat knowing almost everyone and we the people knew and trusted them, now we spend the budget buying toys that may come in handy, but should be left to national guard. The modern day solution isn't based on trust anymore because there isn't any, citizens don't see and greet that officer everyday and vice/ versa, builds trust police walking beat were trained to deescalate situations

Tim Janssen
Sun, 07/05/2020 - 7:43pm

There is absolutely no rational reason for why police forces should be given military grade equipment and weaponry. They got along without it in the past quite well and arming them to the teeth can only make them a more dangerous authoritarian entity going forward.