Nearly 200 Michigan communities are financially distressed, despite economy

Michigan municipalities cut staff big-time to get through the last 20 years, including 22,000 fewer law-enforcement positions. And while municipalities most have recovered, the state still considers 139 cities, 36 townships and 15 villages financially distressed. (Shutterstock image)


Michigan comprises 83 counties and 533 municipalities, including 280 cities, 253 villages, and 1,240 townships. Most local governments grew out of a 19th-century survey that divided the state into a grid of square townships, each measuring 6 by 6 miles.

Like many larger states, Michigan can sometimes seem like several different states in one. Nearly half of the state’s residents (4.4 million) live in southeast Michigan counties of Wayne, Oakland, Macomb, Livingston and Washtenaw, while another 1 million are in Grand Rapids and its surrounding suburbs. 

Except for a handful of larger cities, much of the rest of the state is largely rural.

Despite the differences, urban and rural areas are bound by common concerns. 

Chief among them: money. The state of Michigan considers 139 cities, 36 townships and 15 villages “financially distressed,” meaning they’re losing population or property values or poorer or have a higher unemployment rate than the state average for three of the past five years.

They run the gamut from cities including Jackson, Kalamazoo and Southfield to rural communities such as Oscoda, Eagle River and Newberry in northern Michigan.

Dollar drain

Communities rely on two sources of revenue to provide basic services: property taxes and revenue sharing provided by the state. Both have taken serious hits in recent years. 

The rate of growth of property taxes is capped by the state constitution, while property values have only in recent years begun to return to levels before the 2007 housing crash. Revenue sharing began to decrease in the early 2000s before bottoming out in 2012 and rebounding. Last year’s payments of $1.1 billion, though, are still $200 million less than 2001. That doesn’t include inflation.

A 2018 report from the state Treasury concluded that most municipalities weathered the storm.

“Even with rising costs, local units have found ways to control expenditures to keep them from rising faster than revenues. The evidence shows that general fund deficits are down, fund balances are up, and governments are keeping costs below revenues.”

In many cases, cities accomplished that by slashing workforces. From 2001 to 2016, Michigan lost 4,000 municipal law enforcement officers, a 22 percent decline, according to the Michigan Commission on Law Enforcement Standards.

One looming crisis could be pensions. State officials estimate municipal systems have $9.1 billion total in unfunded pension liabilities, forcing annual taxpayer contributions to nearly double from 2010 to 2016 to $1.5 billion per year, according to the state Treasury.

Other issues

Population: Northern Michigan has lost residents for years, as have big cities such as Detroit, Flint and Dearborn. The 2020 Census should determine whether Detroit gains residents for the first time in 60 years. Grand Rapids, Macomb Township, Ann Arbor and Lyon Township in Oakland County are expected to be big population gainers.

Poverty: Remains an urban and rural problem: 1 in 5 residents of both Luce County in the Upper Peninsula and Wayne County, home of Detroit, live below the poverty level of $25,750 in annual income for a family of four. The statewide average is 14.1 percent.

Facts matter. Trust matters. Journalism matters.

If you learned something from the story you're reading please consider supporting our work. Your donation allows us to keep our Michigan-focused reporting and analysis free and accessible to all. All donations are voluntary, but for as little as $1 you can become a member of Bridge Club and support freedom of the press in Michigan during a crucial election year.

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Donate now

Comment Form

Add new comment

Dear Reader: We value your thoughts and criticism on the articles, but insist on civility. Criticizing comments or ideas is welcome, but Bridge won’t tolerate comments that are false or defamatory or that demean, personally attack, spread hate or harmful stereotypes. Violating these standards could result in a ban.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.


Mon, 02/10/2020 - 11:22am

Townships were an entity designed for horse and buggy times and now exist to give wanna be political hack busybodies something to do and too many small "cities" and villages even counties lost their reason for existence long ago, suck these units back into the counties and save the money for something else - roads! Even some counties should consolodate with nieghboring. More state money just extends the foolishness. A good consitution change would make this possible.