Michigan’s cherished Great Lakes, clean waters face threats from all sides

Flint was a wake-up call about access to clean water. Since that crisis, numerous new threats have emerged to Michigan’s waterways, from PFAS to corporate extractions. (Shutterstock image)

 

With 3,288 miles of Great Lakes coastline and 76,439 miles of rivers and streams, Michigan is practically defined by its access to clean, fresh water.

Michigan state regulators consider the open waters of the Great Lakes and inland waters in either “excellent” or “good” condition, despite significant trouble spots around urban and heavily farmed parts of southern Michigan. 

But waters face a host of challenges, from toxic threats such as PFAS chemicals to rising Great Lakes waters and continued controversy over the aging Line 5 oil pipeline under the Straits of Mackinac, which connects lakes Huron and Michigan.

Flint fallout

Michigan’s challenges were thrust into the national spotlight during the Flint water crisis, when the city’s water supply was contaminated with lead after a state-appointed emergency manager ordered a switch in Flint’s drinking water source.

After the emergency, Michigan adopted the nation’s strictest laws for lead in drinking water, requiring utilities to replace all the state’s roughly 500,000 lead service pipes within 20 years. That could cost upward of $2.5 billion, and leaders of municipal utilities contend the measure is an unfunded mandate.

PFAS chemicals

Michigan has been among the leaders nationwide in testing for PFAS, chemicals that have seeped into water supplies nationwide.

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), used in nonstick, waterproof products such as Teflon, are linked to cancer and were used at as many as 11,300 Michigan fire stations, landfills, industrial sites, military bases, airports and other locations, according to state estimates. 

Michigan is suing manufacturers to recover cleanup costs and proposing standards over how much are dangerous to water systems, since the federal government lacks such rules.

Line 5, Nestlé

Two controversies highlight the debate about corporate handling of public resources: the Line 5 oil pipeline and Nestlé’s withdrawals of 400 gallons of water a minute in central Michigan for its Ice Mountain bottled water.

A 66-year-old pipeline, Line 5 carries 23 million gallons of oil and natural gas liquids each day 645 miles from Superior, Wisconsin, to Sarnia, Ontario. Environmental groups fear a leak to the pipeline would cause an ecological disaster in the lake. 

The pipeline’s owner, Enbridge, said that’s highly unlikely –  and wants to protect the pipeline at the Straits of Mackinac with a protective concrete tunnel. Michigan’s Democratic leaders –  Gov. Gretchen Whitmer and Attorney General Dana Nessel – are seeking to shut down the line by challenging the tunnel in court. 

Nestlé, meanwhile, sparked a national outcry after Michigan regulators in 2018 approved the global conglomerate’s permit to increase extractions and take more than 210 million gallons of water per year from its wells. 

Other water woes

  • The Great Lakes are at or near record highs, just years after record lows. Many fear climate change causes extreme swings, worrying that more increases would harm not only homeowners but infrastructure along Lakes Michigan and Huron.
  • Invasive species such as zebra mussels cause more than $100 million in damages to the Great Lakes, studies have shown, and federal officials fear that far more damage could come if Asian carp reach the lakes.

Facts matter. Trust matters. Journalism matters.

If you learned something from the story you're reading please consider supporting our work. Your donation allows us to keep our Michigan-focused reporting and analysis free and accessible to all. All donations are voluntary, but for as little as $1 you can become a member of Bridge Club and support freedom of the press in Michigan during a crucial election year.

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Donate now

Comment Form

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Comments

Mary Ellen Howard
Mon, 02/10/2020 - 8:47am

Add to your list of “Other water woes,” the high cost municipal water in Michigan combined with high urban poverty which results in tens of thousands of household water shutoffs. Michigan residents need clean, safe, affordable water.

Mary Ellen Howard
Mon, 02/10/2020 - 8:47am

Add to your list of “Other water woes,” the high cost municipal water in Michigan combined with high urban poverty which results in tens of thousands of household water shutoffs. Michigan residents need clean, safe, affordable water.

Matt
Mon, 02/10/2020 - 10:28am

Mary, sorry to burst your bubble but Michigan's and other Great Lakes state's water bills are amongst the lowest in the country. Places here with the higher bills are the results of high muni labor rates and neglected maintainence costs - poor management, (both from the provider ... and of the customer.)

Don
Wed, 02/12/2020 - 1:05pm

Seems that Michigan Department of Environmental Quality Now Known as a cost of 5 million to change their name AGAIN EGLE - Environment, Great Lakes & Energy is not doing a very good job at protecting Michigan environment!!! Is it because the do not hair the bust but friends!!!!

Alex Sagady
Fri, 02/14/2020 - 8:25pm

This claim in the article....
>>>>>>"The pipeline’s owner, Enbridge, said that’s highly unlikely – and wants to protect the pipeline at the Straits of Mackinac with a protective concrete tunnel. Michigan’s Democratic leaders – Gov. Gretchen Whitmer and Attorney General Dana Nessel – are seeking to shut down the line by challenging the tunnel in court. "

…..is FALSE.
The first false claim....
>>>>> [Enbridge] wants to protect the pipeline at the Straits of Mackinac with a protective concrete tunnel

NOPE. The two existing 20 inch ID Line 5 segments in the Mackinac Strait would be abandoned....not put in the tunnel. After the tunnel was completed, then a NEW single 30 inch ID pipeline with 0.812 inch thick pipe walls would be pulled through the tunnel from one side to the other.

The second false claim...
>>>>>>Gov. Gretchen Whitmer and Attorney General Dana Nessel – are seeking to shut down the line by challenging the tunnel in court.

NOPE. Neither Gov. Whitmer nor AG Nessel have challenged the tunnel in court. What they have challenged in court in a motion for summary judgement in response to litigation filed by Enbridge naming Gov. Whitmer as one of the state Defendants (but not AG Nessel) is the enactment of PA 395 of 2018 as unconstitutional that establishes a 'tunnel authority' on the basis of a constitutional technicality. That is NOT a challenge to any permitting for a tunnel, for which there isn't even yet a tunnel permit application to MDEGLE.

Michigan AG Dana Nessel, but NOT Governor Whitmer, has filed litigation against Enbridge attempting to shut down the existing dual Line 5 segments in the Mackinac Strait, and this litigation is pending but moving at a snails pace, with the next hearing on cross motions for summary judgement scheduled for May 22. AG Nessel is attempting to have the 1953 Line 5 Easement Agreement declared to be "void from its inception."