Michigan House passes A-to-F school grades but nixes new commission

Gov. Rick Snyder has long supported an A-to-F grading system for Michigan’s public schools.

Update: Michigan A-to-F school bill gets passing grade in Senate; on to Gov. Rick Snyder
Dec. 21: That's a wrap! What bills passed, died in Michigan lame duck for the ages
Related: See what Michigan lame-duck bills we're tracking

Schools will be graded A to F on five measures under a bill passed by the Michigan House of Representatives at 3 a.m. Thursday. But the compromise bill watered down an effort by the GOP to grab power over Michigan schools.

House Bill 5526 narrowly passed the House, 56-53, wrapping up a marathon burst of legislating that began Wednesday morning and stretched hours past midnight in Michigan’s frantic lame duck session.

The bill was unpopular among Democrats and some Republicans because of skepticism that giving schools grades would improve learning, and because the bill, up until the early hours this morning, created a powerful education commission that usurped broad authority over school accountability schools from the State Board of Education, the education department and incoming Gov. Gretchen Whitmer.

Because the majority of those commission members could be appointed by Republican Gov. Rick Snyder on his way out the door, the commission was seen by critics as a way to undercut control of Michigan schools from Democratic Gov.-elect Whitmer, and from the state board, which will become majority Democrat in January.

    The bill that passed the House replaces the proposed powerful commission with a “peer review panel.” The Michigan Department of Education, instead of the appointed commission envisioned in the earlier version of the bill, will create the accountability system and submit the plan to the review panel, which will issue a report on MDE’s accountability plan back to MDE and to the Legislature.

    The bill does not specify how, or even whether, MDE must respond to the panel’s report.  

    The bill doesn’t completely remove politics and outgoing Republican’s ability to have some say over schools. The panel, though weakened, would be made up of political appointees just as the previously envisioned commission, with three positions filled by the governor, and one each by the Speaker of the House and the Senate Majority leader.

    If this version of the bill were to pass and be signed by Snyder, the panel could be filled with five Republican appointees; if Snyder didn’t fill the panel positions, leaving the job for the incoming Democratic governor, the panel would have a 3-2 Democratic-appointee majority.

    Either way, the panel would not have the same level of power over Michigan schools as the commission envisioned in the original bill.

    A second set of bills that created the same commission envisioned in House Bill 5526 already passed the House. Those bills, which create “public innovation districts” that don’t have to play by all the same rules as traditional schools and mandates a commission to oversee those schools, are now in the Senate, where their fate is uncertain. The bills have not made it out of the Senate Education Committee.

    Under the bill passed by the House, schools would not be given a cumulative letter grade, but would be given letter grades in five metrics. Those metrics are:

    1. Proficiency in math and English language arts
    2. Growth in math and English language arts
    3. Growth in proficiency among English as a second language students
    4. Graduation rates
    5. Academic performance compared to similar schools.

    Facts matter. Trust matters. Journalism matters.

    If you learned something from the story you're reading please consider supporting our work. Your donation allows us to keep our Michigan-focused reporting and analysis free and accessible to all. All donations are voluntary, but for as little as $1 you can become a member of Bridge Club and support freedom of the press in Michigan during a crucial election year.

    Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Donate now

    Comment Form

    Add new comment

    Dear Reader: We value your thoughts and criticism on the articles, but insist on civility. Criticizing comments or ideas is welcome, but Bridge won’t tolerate comments that are false or defamatory or that demean, personally attack, spread hate or harmful stereotypes. Violating these standards could result in a ban.

    Plain text

    • No HTML tags allowed.
    • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
    • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.


    Thu, 12/13/2018 - 9:14am

    #5 (and possibly #3) are the only worthwhile metrics if done accurately and fairly.
    I can save the state a lot of time and money on the other metrics.
    "By looking at three to five community and family demographic variables from U.S. Census data, you can fairly accurately predict the percentages of students who score proficient or above on standardized test scores for grades three through 12. These predictions are made without looking at any school district data factors such as school size, teacher experience or per pupil spending."

    Chuck Jordan
    Fri, 12/14/2018 - 9:06am

    It is too easy to manipulate graduation rates. Look up Credit Recovery. Students are making up a year or more of lost credits by repeatedly taking on-line tests over a few weeks.

    Chuck Fellows
    Sat, 12/15/2018 - 10:44am

    Ranking and rating, grading and scoring, methods of punishment and shaming to insure absolute control over education (not learning) that have failed to effect improvement over the decades. We continue to "reform" the symptoms as we refuse to define the real issues, (See Ken Robinson's video "Paradigms"). Warehousing children as widgets to be processed on an assembly line and graded by date of manufacture, our current system, is not learning. Data produced to meet artificial targets absent context is meaningless. There are three ways to meet a target value, improve the process, distort the data or distort the process (Shewhart & Chambers); we continue to choose the latter two.