A bill working its way through the Legislature would give grades to schools like students get on their report cards.
Beyond bragging rights for an A or the shame of getting an F, though, there’s not much agreement about what the bill would do.
Ask its sponsor, Rep. Tim Kelly, R-Saginaw, and House Bill 5526 is just a way to help parents understand how their kids’ schools are performing.
Ask State Board of Education Co-President Casandra Ulbrich, a Democrat from Rochester Hills, and it’s a “major change to our accountability system.”
Related opinion: Bill to grade Michigan schools A-to-F is a horrible idea
Related opinion: If our kids get graded A-to-F, then our Michigan schools should, too
The different views on the measure – some education groups support it and some don’t – come at least in part from the things that aren’t spelled out in the bill. Would bad grades close schools? Would good ones give schools extra money? That’s not in the bill and would be up to a commission, the members of which aren’t picked. A poor-performing school might be penalized or might get more financial support – that’ll be up to the commission members, the majority of whom will be chosen by politicians.
And, most importantly, would such a system help kids learn? Based on states that have implemented similar letter-grade policies in the past, that’s not clear, either.
The bill is expected to come up to a vote in the House in the coming days, according to Kelly. If it passes, it will be forwarded to the Senate for consideration.
Why this and other education reforms matter
Michigan’s schools are struggling. By most measures, Michigan ranks in the bottom third of states in educational performance. Improving schools is key to improving the Michigan economy, and Gov.-elect Gretchen Whitmer made education one of the focal points of her campaign.
Numerous groups have published reports with plans to fix Michigan schools. While grading schools like they are fifth-graders isn’t a key recommendation in those reports, such a policy also isn’t out of the mainstream – at least 16 states have experimented with such a system.
What is the A-to-F bill?
The bill would sort schools on six components of student performance into six buckets, from A (the best) to F (the worst). Those components:
- Proficiency in math and English
- Growth in math and English
- English language learner growth in English proficiency
- Graduation rate
- Absentee rate
- Participation rate on standardized tests
So there would be an overall A-to-F grade for every school, right?
Nope. The original plan was to have an overall grade, like 15 other states do. That was scrapped, though, as a compromise to win support for the bill, Kelly said.
Instead, in the current version of the bill, each school would get a letter grade in each of six letter performance components. That raises the specter of families, instead of gaining clarity on the quality of their children’s schools, discovering their school received an A, B, C, D and F.
“There was limited (desire) for a summative grade,” Kelly said.
Is there any accountability connected to the A-to-F grades?
The repercussions for bad grades or rewards for good grades aren’t spelled out in the bill. Instead, the bill calls for the creation of a 13-person commission that would both develop the algorithms used to assign grades, and accountability measures for the lowest-performing schools, which the bill specifies are schools in the bottom 5 percent in the state.
That leaves a lot of discretion to the commission members.
Who would serve on this commission?
The Senate majority leader and the speaker of the House both pick one commissioner; the state school superintendent serves on the commission, and he or she picks three more members. The other seven commissioners are chosen by the governor.
All would serve four-year terms. Would lame duck Republican Gov. Rick Snyder rush through appointments before Democrat Gov.-elect Whitmer takes office Jan. 1 if the bill passes in lame duck session?
Kelly said he anticipates Whitmer would appoint the commissioners.
“There’s no point in me packing the commission before I leave,” said Kelly, who is leaving the Legislature after the lame ducks session because of term limits.
Michelle Grinnell, director of communications for Whitmer’s transition team did not respond to a request for comment.
How has it worked in other states?
Florida, under then-Gov. Jeb Bush, was the first state to implement an A-to-F grade system for schools in the late 1990s. There, top-graded schools get bonuses that can be used any way the schools want. Sometimes, the schools divvy up the bonuses to teachers. Students attending F-rated schools could get vouchers to attend private schools.
Educational performance in Florida shot up in the past decade, though the A-to-F rating system was just one of many reforms implemented in the state while Bush was governor.
Fifteen other states have implemented A-to-F grades for schools, some that have better educational outcomes than Michigan and some worse, as measured by the National Assessment of Educational Progress.
There’s been little research studying the impact of school letter grades on learning.
What people are saying about the bill
The State Board of Education opposes the legislation and testified against it this year in the House Education Reform Committee.
“All this does is create more chaos and dysfunction in the school system,” said Ulbrich, the board co-president.
“It doesn’t improve school performance in any way. It continues this flawed idea that standardized test scores (on which many of the letter grade components are based) are the measure of success or failure.”
The Grand Rapids Chamber of Commerce supports the measure.
“The education system in Michigan is at a crisis level,” said Alexa Kramer, public policy coordinator at the business organization. “However we got in this situation, we can all agree we need to shine a much brighter light on how our schools are performing.”
Bill sponsor Kelly said the legislation isn’t about punishing schools or even shaming them, but about helping parents compare schools in a simple way.
“It moves us closer to transparency,” Kelly said.