After Edenville Dam fail, five other Michigan dams may pose lethal danger

Edenville Dam aerial

Edenville Dam had been cited for non-compliance issues for nearly three decades by the time it failed amid heavy rains on May 19. (Credit: Maxar Technologies)

The Edenville Dam, which buried mid-Michigan under billions of gallons of floodwater when it failed May 19, isn’t the only Michigan dam whose failure could threaten widespread destruction and possible death.

The Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes & Energy on Thursday released information identifying five other dams that are classified as high-hazard and are rated in poor condition by the state,  following a Freedom of Information Act Request from Bridge Magazine. 

Among the poor-rated dams: 

  • Just north of the town of Manistique in the Upper Peninsula One is Manistique River dam, owned by a local paper company. Dozens of homes and businesses sit just south of the dam.

  • In southwest Michigan, the Portage Plant Dam, which had once generated electricity, creates Hoffman Pond. The town of Three Rivers is directly south and west of the dam.

By definition, dams classified as high-hazard are those that pose a risk to human lives if they fail. State dam inspectors assign condition ratings of satisfactory, fair, unsatisfactory or poor to each of the 1,061 dams under their oversight, including 85 high-hazard dams.


Another 13 poor-condition Michigan dams pose “significant” potential for downstream damage if they fail — a classification that means a failure would cause widespread damage, but would not likely kill people.Michigan has a total of 2,523 dams. Of those not regulated by EGLE, 92 fall under federal jurisdiction and 1,370 are unregulated.

Although no deaths were reported after Edenville Dam’s failure sent a crush of water downstream into Midland and surrounding communities, the disaster forced the evacuation of some 11,000 people, triggered a chain-reaction failure at the downstream Sanford Dam, and caused widespread damage to private property and public infrastructure.

The infrastructure disaster followed nearly three decades of warnings from federal regulators that the Edenville Dam would not withstand a massive flood. As floodwaters recede, what remains is widespread outrage that nothing was done to fix the dam’s deficiencies, and finger-pointing about those responsible.

The Edenville failure has also sparked calls to strengthen weak dam regulations and fix Michigan’s growing list of decrepit dams. Two-thirds of the state’s dams have outlived their intended 50-year lifespan. 

In a press conference Friday to discuss the safety data, state officials said they didn’t have specific details regarding federal concerns over the Edenville Dam when it transferred from federal to state oversight in 2018. The records were sealed, Michigan officials have said.

Regulators were working with the owners, Boyce Hydro Power, to agree on changes to the dam when it failed. The state can levy fines, force repairs or demand water levels be lowered.

As of May, the state was trying to work “amicably” with Boyce on a plan, said Luke Trumble, one of the state’s two dam safety inspectors. The company had failed to produce an engineers report by a March deadline. During a press conference Friday, Trumble declined to answer what the state had done since Boyce met that deadline.

In addition to Edenville, five high-hazard dams have been flagged for poor condition from southwest Michigan to the Upper Peninsula.

They are:

1. Little Black River Structure B:

This earthen flood control dam outside Cheboygan has been drained dry. State dam safety staff say they believe a break in the dam’s outlet pipe caused a sinkhole near its outlet. The sinkhole “likely does not put the dam in imminent risk of failure,” according to a document provided to Bridge by EGLE spokesman Hugh McDiarmid.  

Still, the document from McDiarmid said, “we take this type of deficiency very seriously and it must be fixed.”

The state is working with the City of Cheboygan to get grant funds from the Federal Emergency Management Agency to fix the issue, McDiarmid wrote.

2. Cornwall Creek Dam:

The spillway of this dam, owned by the Michigan Department of Natural Resources in Cheboygan County, “shows signs of deterioration.” DNR officials are working on designs and permitting for a replacement. The agency is seeking FEMA grant money to pay for fixes and hopes to request bids for the repair project this fall.

3. Buttermilk Creek Detention Dam:

An “unauthorized project” to fill in the auxiliary spillway at this Ottawa County dam resulted in state dam safety staff downgrading its condition from satisfactory to poor. McDiarmid said the poor rating doesn’t reflect a dangerous deficiency at the dam, but rather denotes that the dam requires more analysis to determine whether danger exists.

Since state staff discovered the unauthorized project at Buttermilk Creek, “the engineer has performed an updated analysis of spillway capacity” and concluded that the dam can handle a 200-year flood event.

“However, the lost capacity resulting from filling in the auxiliary spillway would limit the dam’s ability to pass flows larger than the design flood and the 200-year design flood elevation in the pond has increased on the order of a foot or so,” McDiarmid said. 

Although the dam meets state safety standards, state officials have “instructed the owner to submit a plan and schedule” for addressing the spillway issue. They expect it to be submitted in about a month.

4. Portage Plant Dam:

The Portage Power Company, which owns this St. Joseph County dam, has not submitted required inspection reports and emergency action plan updates. Based on a 2013 inspection, EGLE “believes there are no structural or hydraulic deficiencies that pose an immediate threat to the dam’s safety,” according to the statement from McDiarmid.

“EGLE will consider escalated enforcement action if the owner continues to be nonresponsive,” according to the statement. 

5. Manistique Papers Dam:

The dam’s owner is in bankruptcy and the state hopes to remove the dam within five years, according to Dan DeVaun of the state dam safety office.

“It’s an extremely old dam that has deteriorated with age,” DeVaun said during a Friday press conference.

The water levels behind the dam have been lowered for years, DeVaun said, lessening the threat.

The state has allocated $3 million to help remove the dam.

“We’re hoping in the next three to five years to have the structure removed,” DeVaun said.

Manistique River dam in the Upper Peninsula

Michigan has rated as “poor” the dam that restricts the Manistique River in the Upper Peninsula. The dam is considered a “high hazard” dam because a failure could lead to a loss of life. The town of Manistique is downstream of the dam.

Facts matter. Trust matters. Journalism matters.

If you learned something from the story you're reading please consider supporting our work. Your donation allows us to keep our Michigan-focused reporting and analysis free and accessible to all. All donations are voluntary, but for as little as $1 you can become a member of Bridge Club and support freedom of the press in Michigan during a crucial election year.

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Donate now

Comment Form

Add new comment

Dear Reader: We value your thoughts and criticism on the articles, but insist on civility. Criticizing comments or ideas is welcome, but Bridge won’t tolerate comments that are false or defamatory or that demean, personally attack, spread hate or harmful stereotypes. Violating these standards could result in a ban.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.


Kim Laforet
Sat, 06/06/2020 - 1:19pm

Would love to see an investigative report on Dana Nessels suit against the Boyce Dam owners regarding water levels and the attempt to preserve endangered mussels.

Deb Abbott
Sat, 06/06/2020 - 2:51pm

In one of the first stories you published about the Edenville dam failure. You stated something about the residents around the dam complained about "not being able to fish during the winter and their property values were lower because of the low levels of water." Why is this dam failure being blamed on the current governor and AG who have been in office less than 18 months and were petitioned by the homeowners to raise the water levels.

middle of the mit
Sun, 06/07/2020 - 7:57pm

Because it puts the blame on the Dems who are in control of the State and blames those dems for saving mussels instead of relying on the report the GOP appointee who hates regulations put out for the dam. Puts the blame on the State and regulators both of which republicans hate, takes the blame off the homeowners and the dam owner who...........well......

It really is a talking point without context.