Michigan dam safety program underfunded, understaffed, slow to enforce

Dams in Edenville and Sanford failed in May, flooding downstream communities in mid-Michigan, forcing 11,000 people to evacuate and causing $200 million in damages to more than 2,500 structures.

Michigan’s dam safety program suffers from a “culture of minimal enforcement” and lacks the time, staff and budget to properly do its job.

That’s the conclusion of an independent review team tasked with scrutinizing Michigan’s dam safety program in the wake of the May 19 Edenville and Sanford dam failures that flooded downstream communities in mid-Michigan, forcing 11,000 people to evacuate and causing $200 million in damages to more than 2,500 structures.

 

The 267-page Association of State Dam Safety Officials report, released Thursday, notes that “rigorous enforcement of dam safety violations is seldom used and that this has existed for decades.”

“The culture of minimal enforcement has become the commonly accepted practice in Michigan,” the review states, exposing downstream residents and the environment to risk.

But “perhaps the most outstanding finding” is the dam safety program’s chronic understaffing, said review team member Bill Bingham during a presentation Thursday before the Michigan Dam Safety Task Force, a separate governor-appointed body tasked with recommending changes to Michigan’s dam safety regime.

“The current staff is doing the very best job they can,” Bingham said. But the program within the Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes and Energy is “understaffed to perform the mission.”

Reviewers concluded Michigan’s dam safety regime should include 11 staff members, including six dam safety engineers and two enforcement officers, rather than the current staffing level of two inspectors plus a manager. 

The state for years has employed just two inspectors to oversee Michigan’s 1,060 state-regulated dams. With so few staff to conduct inspections, inspection duties are often outsourced to contractors hired by dam owners themselves. 

Following the Edenville and Sanford failures, EGLE leaders announced plans to hire a third inspector. Michigan’s recently-approved budget includes money to hire two more, for a total of five inspectors.

In a statement Thursday, EGLE Director Liesl Clark said the report “acknowledges the decades of underinvestment in infrastructure in Michigan, which includes many dams that, if they failed, would put downstream residents’ lives in jeopardy.”

Related stories:

Clark said EGLE and the state dam safety task force will “take a close look” at the recommendations and “welcome working collaboratively with the Legislature and other stakeholders to strengthen Michigan’s Dam Safety Program while also holding owners accountable for safely operating their dams.”

Bingham noted that many of the review team’s recommendations would require legislative approval. 

The Dam Safety Task force will use the report as part of a broader review that will recommend changes to Michigan’s dam safety regime. Recommendations are expected in early 2021.

Details about what caused the Edenville Dam to fail, and who is to blame, will come later, as part of an independent investigation. 

State and federal regulators failed to force the dam’s owner, Boyce Hydro, to make repairs despite decades of warnings that the dam could not handle a heavy flood. The failure has prompted a host of class-action lawsuits seeking to assign blame for the disaster. 

With no dedicated funding available to step in and make repairs when a dam owner is unable or unwilling to address safety issues identified during inspections, Michigan regulators frequently opt not to cite dam owners, fearing that fines will only further reduce the owner’s ability to pay for repairs. 

Among a host of recommendations, the peer review team said Michigan should establish a dam safety emergency fund to fix unsafe dams when owners won’t, and a revolving loan fund to help public dam owners pay for needed repairs and upgrades. 

The emergency fund “would give Michigan the funds to act in a timely way” if a dam owner cannot or will not do so, Bingham said. 

Among the peer review team’s other recommendations: 

  • Update Michigan’s flood control standards, which require dams like Edenville to meet only 50 percent of the probable maximum flood. Michigan’s standards are among the weakest in the nation.
  • Require owners of aging high-hazard dams, which could kill people if they fail, to conduct “detailed re-evaluation” of their dams that could identify safety defects or other issues. The reviewers noted that many Michigan dams have aged beyond their intended lifespan and “have never been re-evaluated.”
  • Collaborate with Association of Dam Safety Officers and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, which regulates hydropower-generating dams, to ensure a smoother transfer of regulatory authority when FERC revokes the license for a dam, passing regulatory authority over to the state. When FERC revoked the Edenville Dam power-generating license in September 2018, Michigan inherited regulatory power but state officials said they lacked key information about the dam because FERC had classified the documents.
  • Inspect high and significant-hazard dams more frequently: Once a year for high-hazard dams and every other year for significant hazard dams. Currently, state-regulated dams in Michigan are inspected every three to five years.
  • Bolster permitting requirements for dam owners, including requiring owners of high or significant hazard dams to obtain independent review of the dams every 10 years or less.

The reviewers also recommended a host of changes to the dam safety program, from updating the position description for the dam safety program manager and publishing an annual report to developing an annual training plan for dam safety staff.

Read the full report here.

Facts matter. Trust matters. Journalism matters.

If you learned something from the story you're reading please consider supporting our work. Your donation allows us to keep our Michigan-focused reporting and analysis free and accessible to all. All donations are voluntary, but for as little as $1 you can become a member of Bridge Club and support freedom of the press in Michigan during a crucial election year.

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Donate now

Comment Form

Add new comment

Dear Reader: We value your thoughts and criticism on the articles, but insist on civility. Criticizing comments or ideas is welcome, but Bridge won’t tolerate comments that are false or defamatory or that demean, personally attack, spread hate or harmful stereotypes. Violating these standards could result in a ban.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Comments

lostinacointoss
Thu, 10/01/2020 - 5:21pm

You can have as many inspectors and engineers on staff as you want. But if you can't legally hold private owners accountable for neglect and mismanagement, things will never change. Lee Mueller of Boyce Hydro, flat out, should be able to be criminally prosecuted for what he has done - or didn't do. He should've been in handcuffs on May 20, and in an orange jumpsuit on May 21.

If a business owns a building and their electrical isn't up to code they can be shut down and have their building stripped from them in a couple of months if they don't come to compliance. The feds let Boyce and Mueller slip through the cracks for 15 years. Why? Because Mueller knew he faced no real legal consequences if he didn't perform their orders. Dam reform can start with adding extra staff, but it needs to end with a drastically increased severity in criminal and civil prosecution/penalties to dam owners. If it had, maybe Mueller and Boyce wouldn't have bought these in the first place, and this disaster could have been avoided.

Barry Visel
Thu, 10/01/2020 - 6:20pm

Maybe it’s time to eliminate a lot of dams. If lake communities are impacted then offer them the opportunity to own and maintain the dam. State taxpayers should not be on the hook for dams that have outlived their purpose or provide lake living for a few.

EB
Fri, 10/02/2020 - 10:38am

The state knew these dams were vulnerable and should have ordered the reservoirs drained until these vulnerabilities were fixed. That would have taken political courage, a rare commodity.

Other than recreation, there was no other purpose for these dams. The former reservoir bottoms can be used for other recreational purposes and these dams should not be rebuilt.

TJH
Fri, 10/02/2020 - 12:15pm

If it is not already required, the rules should specify that private dam owners secure huge insurance policies which name the State/MI citizens as additional insured parties.

MI dams
Fri, 10/02/2020 - 7:33pm

Michigan’s dam safety program suffers from a “culture of minimal enforcement” and lacks the time, staff and budget to properly do its job.

“The culture of minimal enforcement has become the commonly accepted practice in Michigan,” the review states, exposing downstream residents and the environment to risk.>>>>

Wrong! America suffers from a culture of privatization will take care of everything, without paying taxes to keep it up! Enforcement? The Private sector regulates itself better than any government. And this is what we get.

<<<<State and federal regulators failed to force the dam’s owner, Boyce Hydro, to make repairs despite decades of warnings that the dam could not handle a heavy flood.>>>>

This is why the State will choose to demolish the dams and go back to nature. Less taxes and no upkeep. Because we can't fine the owners because that would inhibit their ability to pay the fine and upgrades! Does that make sense at all? To anyone? Tell that to the ex- prisoners in Fl that can't vote 'till they pay their bill!

<<<<Michigan should establish a dam safety emergency fund to fix unsafe dams when owners won’t, and a revolving loan fund to help public dam owners pay for needed repairs and upgrades. >>>

NO! The lakefront owners can do that all by themselves. They don't need taxpayer money from rubes they don't want on "their beaches" or using "their lakes."

It's time for those who have money to start paying for at least the upgrades that they want near their homes. You don't want graduated tax rates, heck some of you think that only poor people should pay taxes.

Let the State drain the lakes. At least that way you get what you are willing to pay for.