Citizenship question is gone. Michigan immigrants still distrust the Census

President Donald Trump dropped in July his plans to include a citizenship question, but doing so created distrust that could deter some from completing the census this spring. (Shutterstock image)

President Donald Trump’s plans to include a citizenship question on the 2020 U.S. Census have come and gone, but they continue to spark fear among immigrants about what the government will do with information collected in the count.

Community advocates say this trepidation could cost vulnerable communities federal funding.

“Most people don't know that the Supreme Court said ‘no’ on the citizenship question,” said Rima Merough, director of advocacy and community engagement for ACCESS, a Dearborn nonprofit  that works with Arab Americans.

Trump dropped his plans in July, but doing so created distrust that could deter some from completing the census this spring, said Linda Delgado-Kipp, president of the Lansing Latino Health Alliance

That distrust is a major barrier for community leaders like Delgado-Kipp and Merough, who rely on Census data to serve their neighbors. Delgado-Kipp uses information to promote free diabetes screenings, while Merough uses the data to offer translation services. A higher response rate provides a better picture of where their work would be most impactful, and more federal funding trickling down for such programs.

Statewide, community leaders are trying to persuade immigrant groups that the census is something to welcome, not fear. 

“We have to work triple as hard,” Merough said. 

Concern knows no immigration status

Nearly 1 in 4 people in the United States are “very” or “extremely” concerned their census responses will be used against them, according to research by the Census Bureau.

Community advocates say for immigrant communities, it’s a fear sparked by more than the citizenship question in isolation. And the fear of the government’s intentions isn’t confined to those with precarious immigration status.

A mix of heightened distrust in government, anti-immigrant sentiments on the national and local level and resurging deportation rates have citizens and holders of green cards concerned, advocates said.

“If your visa is still valid and you have members of your community whose visas are not still valid, you don’t want [Immigrations and Customs Enforcement] to come into your community,” said Fatou-Seydi Sarr, founder of the Detroit nonprofit African Bureau for Immigration and Social Affairs.

 

It is illegal for the Census Bureau to give ICE house-level census data to aid in deportations or raids. The bureau is legally obligated to keep all data confidential, and only publically releases data in small chunks of multiple households called “census tracts.”

Historically, this data anonymity largely has been upheld. Requests to access individual census data have been rejected by the Supreme Court

Census data were, however, infamously used to find populations of Japanese-Americans during WWII so they could be forcibly interned in camps.

And even publicly available data can be manipulated to identify some information about individuals, the Census Bureau found in 2016. According to the investigative news site Reveal, the bureau’s data scientists were able to use a technique called database reconstruction method to “accurately reconstruct the census responses for individuals’ age, sex, race, ethnicity and census block for almost half of the U.S. population,” and connect names to 17 percent of the country’s population.

Add in the Trump administration’s ongoing efforts to build a database of noncitizens within the Census Bureau for undisclosed purposes, and it’s difficult to persuade the skittish that answering the census is entirely safe, experts said.

“It’s a risk assessment for everyone,” said Merough, emphasizing that risks can be practically nonexistent and still sway behavior when the risk of deportation looms.

It’s unclear how distrust would affect participation. The state doesn’t track participation rates by immigrant communities, said Ryan Bridges, a spokesman for  Ebersole Singh.

Census research reports that 67 percent of Americans say they are likely to respond to the 2020 Census, a drop from 86 percent in 2010, when the actual self-response rate was 76 percent. (Shutterstock image)

Fear molding outreach efforts

Widespread fear is shaping how both government and community groups promote census participation.The state government’s outreach efforts put data security front and center as a main message.

Michigan’s census promotion focuses on “three C’s: that it’s convenient, confidential and critical,” Kerry Ebersole Singh, the state’s census director, told Bridge Magazine in an interview last fall. 

Her office confirmed that “confidential” was chosen as a key message to directly counter data privacy concerns through the state’s $5.2 million ad campaign.

A recently released, $500 million national ad campaign from the U.S. Census Bureau also emphasizes that response data is “secure.”

Decreased response rate in Michigan’s immigrant populations and their communities could impact the state’s national political clout.

Michigan is likely to lose a congressional seat due to population trends. Immigrants drove the state’s recent population uptick and make up 7 percent of the state’s population. A depressed census turnout among the demographics responsible for the state’s slight population growth may increase the possibility Michigan loses a seat in the 2021 redistricting.

To some extent, distrust of the government is a factor in every census. About 20 percent of the entire population, known as the “cynical fifth” to census researchers, distrust the government and by extension the census. These people are found in every demographic group, though census research finds distrust of government a more common sentiment in minority populations.

That rate may be on the rise. Census research reports that 67 percent of Americans say they are likely to respond to the 2020 Census, a drop from 86 percent in 2010, when the actual self-response rate was 76 percent.

While Delgado-Kipp finds state’s efforts to promote data security are “commendable,” efforts to win back trust are still difficult because the Census Bureau is still a branch of the government many residents don’t trust.

Census research agrees with her— the bureau has found people are more likely to trust information about the census when it comes from members of their own community. The state and city governments are trying to capitalize on that by partnering with local groups like ACCESS, asking them to promote census response in their own community.

Even as a trusted voice, community advocates say it’s more complicated than just saying “you can trust the census.”

Events are a common way to raise awareness and support for a cause, like political rallies, but advocates across the country have watched their census-oriented events fall flat.

Delgado-Kipp said prospective attendees have to weigh the chance of encountering law enforcement, who may know from event advertisements that it will gather a large number of immigrants and members of minority populations in one place. They have to ask themselves, “What if I go to this event and what happens if I get stopped? Even though it's open and free, what happens?” she says.

Many, she said, err on the side of caution and stay away.

ACCESS found that census events not only drew small crowds, but the wrong one. 

“If they're not going to fill out the census, they're not likely to come to an event about the census,” said Merough.

Without dedicated census events to use as promotion, groups have to decentralize their outreach efforts.

“We have integrated a lot of the processes for census outreach into our programs,” says Merough, such as asking clients who visit the office to fill out a census pledge card.

Sarr of the African Bureau for Immigration and Social Affairs said it has also eschewed events for concerns about attendees’ security and instead meets people where they are comfortable, in homes, braiding shops, places of worship and grocery stores.

“The traditional ways [of doing community outreach] don’t make people feel comfortable at all, especially in this time,” she said.

Facts matter. Trust matters. Journalism matters.

If you learned something from the story you're reading please consider supporting our work. Your donation allows us to keep our Michigan-focused reporting and analysis free and accessible to all. All donations are voluntary, but for as little as $1 you can become a member of Bridge Club and support freedom of the press in Michigan during a crucial election year.

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Donate now

Comment Form

Add new comment

Dear Reader: We value your thoughts and criticism on the articles, but insist on civility. Criticizing comments or ideas is welcome, but Bridge won’t tolerate comments that are false or defamatory or that demean, personally attack, spread hate or harmful stereotypes. Violating these standards could result in a ban.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Comments

Anonymous
Mon, 03/02/2020 - 8:55am

Not filling out the census is unfair to the many who are United States citizens , our country is becoming over run with illegals at some point they do need to control illegals from entering the country and not becoming citizens .

Ren Farley
Mon, 03/02/2020 - 9:38am

Thank you very much for this essay about Census 2020. I appreciate your writing about this important topic.
I presumed that the addition of a citizenship question would depress the response rate and lead to an undercount of those who are not citizens. In the summer of 2019, the Census Bureau's American Community Survey sent questionnaires to a sample of 480,000. Half of the questionnaires included the proposed citizenship question and half did not.
Surprisingly, there was not a large or statistically significant difference in the response rate. Nor was there a large or significant difference in the percent of respondents who identified themselves as Hispanic.
The results surprised me but they suggest that adding the citizenship question might have had fewer consequences than anticipated.

Arjay
Mon, 03/02/2020 - 4:47pm

Why are we counting non-citizens in the census? The census is used to allocate US Representatives. Why then should a non-citizen boost the number of reps for a state? We need an amendment to right this wrong.

Anna
Tue, 03/03/2020 - 9:10am

We are counting non-citizens because the US Constitution requires the census to count "all residents". For that exact reason, we use the number of residents, rather than the number of citizens, to allocate US Representatives. California and New York both very strongly prefer it that way, because their relatively high concentration of non-citizen residents gives them a significant boost in Congressional power. For us in Michigan, this practice means we have less and less legislative influence in Washington DC.

It remains more appropriate, in my opinion, to allocate highway, housing, education, justice, and health program support from the Federal government by the number of residents, not only citizens. I would support a constitutional amendment to redirect the US Census in 2030 to that end, in line with United Nations and other international body's recommendations.

Arjay
Tue, 03/03/2020 - 11:46am

I fully understand the Constitution, thus my statement that we need an amendment. If some states want to flood their borders with non-citizens, let that state pay for it and not penalize the states that comply with federal law. Michigan is certainly getting the short end of the stick the way things are today. The framers of this Country probably could not fathom the difference between citizens and residents some 230+ years ago.

Anna
Tue, 03/03/2020 - 9:10am

We are counting non-citizens because the US Constitution requires the census to count "all residents". For that exact reason, we use the number of residents, rather than the number of citizens, to allocate US Representatives. California and New York both very strongly prefer it that way, because their relatively high concentration of non-citizen residents gives them a significant boost in Congressional power. For us in Michigan, this practice means we have less and less legislative influence in Washington DC.

It remains more appropriate, in my opinion, to allocate highway, housing, education, justice, and health program support from the Federal government by the number of residents, not only citizens. I would support a constitutional amendment to redirect the US Census in 2030 to that end, in line with United Nations and other international body's recommendations.