Trump: Dismiss Michigan votes GOP didn’t witness. Experts say that’s absurd.

A voter casts a ballot in Flint on Election Day. One week after the votes were counted, President Trump is amid a long-shot legal strategy that seeks to delay certification of the results. (Bridge photo by Dale Young)

President Donald Trump took to social media again Wednesday to share false allegations about voter fraud in Michigan and the GOP poll challengers he claims were unable to witness it. 

“Nobody wants to report that Pennsylvania and Michigan didn’t allow our Poll Watchers and/or Vote Observers to Watch or Observe,” he wrote in a tweet that Twitter flagged for containing disputed information. 

“This is responsible for hundreds of thousands of votes that should not be allowed to count. Therefore, I easily win both states. Report the news!”

The tweet contained several falsehoods, not the least of which is GOP challengers were plentiful in Michigan and no credible evidence has emerged about voter fraud. But it’s part of a larger narrative and legal argument by the Trump campaign that Michigan’s election is illegitimate because Republican poll workers and watchers were outnumbered in some Democratic cities such as Detroit.

It’s an argument that critics say is dumbfounding and insulting, because it’s based on the assumption of rampant cheating if GOP challengers don’t monitor vote counting in the predominantly African-American city.

Trump’s campaign and supporters have filed five lawsuits since last week seeking to delay or stop certification of the Michigan election. If he’s able to persuade a judge to set aside Wayne County’s absentee votes, he would win Michigan and its 16 electoral votes by some 6,000 votes. 

“It's just reflective of the enormous barriers that communities of color still face in the voting process, not just in getting registered and actually casting their ballots but even in having those ballots counted after the fact,” said Jonathan Diaz, legal counsel for voting rights at the Campaign Legal Center, a nonprofit voter advocacy group.

At issue are Michigan election laws that mandate at least one election inspector, also known as a poll worker, from each major political party per precinct. The law allows for some exceptions, saying the number doesn’t have to be equal but should be  “as nearly as possible.”

Likewise, the state election code limits one poll challenger from each political party per absentee voter counting board.  

No one disputes there were more Democratic election inspectors than Republican ones in Detroit on election night. Election officials also acknowledge that, for a brief time, some Republicans who left TCF Center in Detroit where absentee ballots were counted were not immediately let back in because of COVID-19 capacity restrictions.

Norm Shinkle, deputy chairman of the Michigan Republican Party, said Detroit Clerk Janice Winfrey had an opportunity to hire  “as the law states, half of her workers to be Republican and half to be Democrat.” 

“She didn't do that,” Shinkle said. “And that exacerbated the problem.”

He is one of four members of the Board of State Canvassers who are supposed to meet Nov. 23 to certify the state election. Shinkle told Bridge this week that his vote isn’t guaranteed because of reports of irregularities in Detroit.

The allegations

Lawrence Garcia, an attorney for the city of Detroit who was present at the TCF Center, wrote in an affidavit there were also “numerous Republican inspectors always present” in Detroit.  

But were there enough? And will it make any difference?

The Trump campaign filed a lawsuit this week in federal court containing more than 100 affidavits from GOP challengers, some of whom say the lack of Republican election became a problem when workers duplicated ballots.

It’s not uncommon during elections to make copies of ballots that are dirtied, but workers from both parties are supposed to observe the process.

GOP challenger John Miller wrote in an affidavit that he was told he couldn’t watch election workers duplicate a ballot because he was told the process was “personal, like voting.” 

Bonnie Pettibone, another Republican Party challenger, wrote that she observed a ballot being duplicated and approached a supervisor to ask if there was a Republican worker present to witness the duplication.

"He said he didn't know. The inspectors continued to duplicate the ballot,” Pettibone wrote.

Christopher Trebilcock, a Detroit-based election law attorney who has represented Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, notes that under Michigan law, a bipartisan team of workers must be present when “false read” ballots are duplicated. 

False read ballots are ballots rejected by tabulators due to an “over vote.” This over vote could be caused by a correction (such as an erasure), a stray mark that the tabulator identified as a vote or an invalid write-in vote. 

When the scanner is unable to read the ballot, one Republican and one Democratic election inspector must review the ballot to try to determine what the voter’s intent was in a process called adjudication. They do so by looking to see if the voter attempted to correct the vote, or if a simple stray mark was the culprit. 

Once the bipartisan workers have determined the voter’s intent, they transpose the ballot and put the new one through the scanner to be counted.

In a Nov. 6 legal filing, city of Detroit attorneys said workers from both parties were present whenever this practice occurred. 

“That process was followed, and plaintiffs do not — and cannot — present any evidence to the contrary,” they wrote. 

Chris Thomas, the retired Michigan elections director who helped oversee Detroit’s election, wrote in an affidavit that the complaints from challengers in the Trump suit make it clear they “do not understand absent voter ballot processing and tabulating.”

Diaz, the election attorney, said the Trump campaign has presented a “dearth of evidence.” 

“There does not appear to be any evidence of misconduct or fraud or any kind of irregularity outside of just the normal administrative error or human error that comes with running an election of this size,” he said. 

Perennial problem

Recruiting Republican poll workers is a perennial problem in Democratic cities like Detroit, which favored Democrat Joe Biden 94 percent to 5 percent over Trump last week .

But this year was supposed to be different.

Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson, a Democrat, recruited more than 30,000 election workers statewide, including 6,000 for the city of Detroit.

Benson’s office, however, did not ask for their political party, spokesperson Tracy Wimmer told Bridge.

“We did not have affiliation information—that was ascertained by [Detroit] as they followed up, trained and organized workers,” Wimmer wrote in an email.

Monica Palmer, the chairperson of the Wayne County Board of Canvassers, told Bridge Michigan several Republicans she knows who applied for the inspector positions were told that staffing was full or never had their calls returned.

“I’m asking for clarification on the hiring process,” said Palmer, a Republican. "How do they make sure they have an ample amount of Democrats and Republicans to cover those offices?”

Garcia told Bridge that both political parties were provided with lists of election inspectors before absentee ballots were counted — and neither objected to the representation.

The GOP could have “taken the issue up in advance of the election,” Garcia noted. 

During testimony Wednesday in a lawsuit seeking to delay the certification in Wayne County, Democratic Party attorney John Devaney warned that upwards of 1 million voters would be disenfranchised if Trump is successful.

“The outcome undermines the very bedrock of democracy,” David Fink, an attorney for the city of Detroit, said at the hearing.

That seems unlikely, election exports said.

A limited decision to throw out ballots that were duplicated when both Democrats and Republicans were not present would still leave Biden with enough votes to win in Michigan.

“Based on the allegations I’ve read, the actual ballots that they’re challenging, there's an insufficient number,” Trebilcock said. 

“Even if what they alleged was true, it won’t make a difference.”

This article is made possible through Votebeat, a nonpartisan reporting project covering local election integrity and voting access. This article is available for reprint under the terms of Votebeat’s republishing policy.

Facts matter. Trust matters. Journalism matters.

If you learned something from the story you're reading please consider supporting our work. Your donation allows us to keep our Michigan-focused reporting and analysis free and accessible to all. All donations are voluntary, but for as little as $1 you can become a member of Bridge Club and support freedom of the press in Michigan during a crucial election year.

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Donate now

Comment Form

Add new comment

Dear Reader: We value your thoughts and criticism on the articles, but insist on civility. Criticizing comments or ideas is welcome, but Bridge won’t tolerate comments that are false or defamatory or that demean, personally attack, spread hate or harmful stereotypes. Violating these standards could result in a ban.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.


Fri, 11/13/2020 - 2:39am

Is this real life?

Andy Harman
Fri, 11/13/2020 - 9:22am

You liars call yourself "non-partisan", yet in every story you start out by characterizing Donald Trumps lawsuits as "long-shot". I would consider it an honor to be banned on this one note alone. Maybe it will be a record. But since there are no other comments, maybe everybody who disagrees with you have already been banned. Or maybe nobody cares about your stupid web site.l

Fri, 11/13/2020 - 4:21pm

The lawsuits aren't being described as long shots because the author is a partisan; they are long shots because they are legally ridiculous and it would take a miracle fo them to be upheld. In other words, they are reporting reality not the fantasy you seem to have that there is a conspiracy among hundreds of election officials across all the counties that chose someone other than who you like.

You lost. Most of us (not all to be sure) accepted when we lost. We didn't like it and you don't need to either. But you do need to move on to whatever's naxt. This is done.

Sat, 11/14/2020 - 10:03am

So tell us. Where is the evidence that any of Trump's lawsuits have any evidence or witnesses to back up any of the claims? Court after court is rejecting their lawsuits. Republican and Democratic courts. So tell us where the 'evidence' is and where the eyewitnesses are. We're waiting.

Sat, 11/14/2020 - 5:04pm

Just go somewhere else and leave us in peace. Fox News, QAnon, Breitbarf, etc. They'll all tell you what you want to hear with no interference from facts, evidence, truth or reality. And you will be so happy!

Fri, 11/13/2020 - 10:25am

I'd say considering that Joe Biden actually told us all that the Left has an extensive and inclusive voter fraud system used for Obama, is pretty absurd! There has been fraud, period. Far too many people have witnessed it. Your narrative, deceitful rhetoric is not going to work. The truth and justice will be served. We are very sick of the lies and attacks on the POTUS as well as us, his supporters. Why is it no Conservatives took to the streets when you and all of the paid off fake news sources, declared Biden the winner? Right, because us deplorables are intelligent people who see and seek the truth, unlike those who've obviously sold their souls to evil? I want every lawsuit to stand, the Supremes to rule this a null and void election. Then the House can vote, all 37 Republican states, to re-elect Trump.

Fri, 11/13/2020 - 10:45am

Senator Johnson’s attempt to disenfranchise Detroit voters is wrong. She obstructed the legal recount of 2016 when Trump won by 0.2%. She knows Trump lost by 3%. She is pandering to Trump’s base. Meanwhile, she does NOTHING to help mitigate the pandemic.

George Hagenauer
Fri, 11/13/2020 - 10:48am

Part of the Republican problem at this point is that their focus has been on voter suppression (took me three tries to get a driver's license here because it is a state identity card so detailed that I can travel toCanada on it in lieu of a passport when Canada lets me in) and gerrymandering. As a result the normal voting processes tend to be de-emphasized. The end system however means that Democrats or people who just favor access by citizens to be able to vote have become highly skilled in all the details related to voting . There is a large cohort of Democrats who are involved in various aspects of the voting process and volunteering in various ways at the polls and in registering people. Given the quality of the challenges raised on the Republican and their losses in court the same level of skill and understanding about the details of the voting process does not exist on the Republican side. And that is one reason why they lost the election. An interesting question here is whether heavily Republican rural districts had enough Democratic judges but that won't arise until the Wayne County canvassers finish their process.

Julie B.
Fri, 11/13/2020 - 12:24pm

I can personally vouch that my precinct in Redford Township had a challenger from both parties on site all day on November 3.

Tue, 11/24/2020 - 2:19am

I applied three times as a Republican to work in Detroit as either an inspector or AV counting board. Contact w/ actual personnel to follow up was hit or miss. I contacted officials hiring several times. I was telephoned approximately 3 wks before election & told that all inspector/counter positions had been filled. But would I be interested in working another position? (Nondescript position w/ no job description known to caller). I said Yes & arranged training session. Training was cancelled at last minute on training day, not rescheduled. ... My attempts to contact officials after this were ignored completely. Was I put off bc I’m a republican? How many trainees scheduled that day were republicans? Idk, seems likely. It is a bald faced lie for Detroit officials like Baxter/Winfrey to say they did all they could to recruit/hire republican poll workers/counters in order to comply w/ State mandate requiring at least 1 worker from each party at every precinct. They claim this was impossible bc they could not find enough republicans willing to work- BULLSHIT!
Regardless of any party affiliation, I do not like to be lied to. Even more offensive when it’s done publicly w/ impunity. They are lying. I’ve called them out not bc of party affiliation; but bc the truth always comes out