In the spring, Gov. Whitmer praised an opioid clinic. In the fall, a veto.

opioid clinic groundbreaking

On April 29, Gov. Gretchen Whitmer broke ground for an opioid disorder recovery home near Jackson and she promised it would help change lives. Five months later, she vetoed funding for the facility. (Photo by J. Scott Park / MLive) 

Michigan Health Watch is made possible by generous financial support from the Michigan Health Endowment Fund, the Michigan Association of Health Plans, and the Michigan Health and Hospital Association. The monthly mental health special report is made possible by generous financial support of the Ethel & James Flinn Foundation. Please visit the Michigan Health Watch 'About' page for more information.

On a rainy day last April near Jackson, Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer broke ground on a $10 million, long-term recovery home for opiate addicts called Andy’s Place. Standing to her far left, with a shovel of his own, was GOP Senate Majority Leader Mike Shirkey – who happens to represent Jackson.

"The crisis that we're confronting as a state is powerful,” Whitmer said that day.

“It does not discriminate, it does not abate. We must fight it. Andy's Place is going to be one of those places that changes lives and improves them for the better."

Five months later, Whitmer vetoed $750,000 in state funding for the project, a move that stopped the facility’s planned construction.

Whitmer's action has confounded those involved in the project who wonder whether the governor's veto constitutes hypocrisy following her words of support last spring, or simply an effort to embarrass the Republican leader in his district. 

Either way, they say, it's not a good look because it limits options for people battling substance abuse and addiction.

“Obviously the governor was trying to get the attention of the Senate Majority Leader,” said Chris Mitchell, executive vice president of the Michigan Health and Hospital Association, a trade industry group that represents Michigan’s community hospitals.

“This is just an unfortunate outcome of the political gamesmanship that is being played.”

The Andy’s Place project is named in memory of Andy Hirst, 24, who died nine years ago of a heroin overdose.


Mike Hirst, advocate for an opioid recovery project named for his son, said if the governor’s veto holds up, it “would mean more lives lost, more people who won’t be able to recover from this epidemic.”

Mike Hirst, Andy’s father, told Bridge he is baffled by Whitmer’s veto.

“I just can’t understand it,” said Hirst, named Citizen of the Year in 2016 by the Jackson Citizen Patriot for his advocacy for better understanding and treatment of opiate addiction. He has been a driving force behind the establishment of Andy’s Place.

“I am dismayed. This project should not be caught up in a political chess game. We are hoping that Governor Whitmer will find it in her heart to take another look at it. There are too many lives at stake.”

‘A misguided strategy’ 

In the grand scheme of 147 vetoes amounting to more than $900 million in cuts to the $59 billion state budget, a $750,000 veto may seem like pocket change in a much larger fight.

But it’s emblematic of the budgetary brinkmanship Whitmer is playing with GOP leaders of the House and Senate, in several instances involving projects that, like Andy’s Place, Whitmer had previously supported, or championed in her election campaign. 

They include $375 million in one-time road funding (she is holding out for a longer-term and far more sizeable investment), $37 million for Pure Michigan advertising, $16.6 million for rural hospitals, $26 million for school career and technical education equipment and security funds, and $15 million earmarked for municipal airports to battle PFAS.  

After touring the state for months to sell her roads plan, her proposed 45-cent gas tax hit a brick wall in the GOP-controlled Legislature. She initially threatened to veto any budget that did not include more than $2 billion in road funding, then retreated from budget negotiations to avoid a government shutdown.

Calling the budget produced by Republicans “a mess,” Whitmer then issued her string of vetoes and used a state Administrative Board to shift more than $600 million of Republican-backed funding within departmental budgets.

“I used my executive power to protect Michiganders’ public health and safety, access to healthcare, and classroom spending for our children,” Whitmer said in a statement.

If the cuts were a tactic to force Republicans to cave on road funding, veteran political analyst and former Republican lawmaker Bill Ballenger said it is one that Whitmer thus far is losing.

“She obviously calculated that what she was doing was so over the top and outrageous that it would drive Republicans back to the bargaining table. Apparently, it’s a misguided strategy and it’s blown up in her face,” Ballenger told Bridge.

Indeed, on Tuesday Republicans sent the governor a supplemental budget that attempts to restore many of the funds Whitmer vetoed, just the latest turn in Lansing political theater. 

After issuing her vetoes, Whitmer said she remained “eager to negotiate with the Legislature.”

Shirkey, for his part, has spent much of the past week politely baiting the first-term governor. “If my governor thinks that she made a mistake with her red pen, she can let us know which ones she’d like to have back so we can reinstate those,” he said. 

Ballenger said he believes Whitmer’s veto of funding for Andy’s Place is all about tweaking Shirkey. 

“No question,” he said, “it is personal.” 

Shirkey spokeswoman Amber McCann declined to say if Shirkey saw the veto that way. 

“I'm not going to comment on speculation,” she said. “This is a cause the governor supports and, in fact, earlier this year she created an opioid task force to help bring us one step closer to finally ending the opioid epidemic in Michigan and keeping families safe.”

Whitmer spokeswoman Tiffany Brown said she “would not comment” on whether the governor’s Andy’s Place veto was tied to its location in Shirkey’s district.

“While the budgets have been signed, there is still more work to do,” Brown said. “It's important that differences are put aside and all parties get serious about mending some of the glaring holes that are in the budget that impact areas like public health and safety.”

Autism programs and military cemeteries 

Republican pollster Steve Mitchell noted that Whitmer’s vetoes in Shirkey’s district go beyond Andy’s Place: Whitmer also vetoed $600,000 for traffic control at Michigan International Speedway.

“You can go through these vetoes and find a legislator’s name attached to it,” Mitchell said.

Mitchell drew a link between a Whitmer veto of more than $1 million in autism program funding and the GOP House Speaker Lee Chatfield, whom he noted has family members diagnosed as being on the spectrum.  

“That goes beyond the pale,” Mitchell said of Whitmer’s cuts.

As it happens, Whitmer had also appeared last April before the Autism Alliance of Michigan to praise that organization’s work, according to Crain’s Detroit Business. That organization, too, lost funding through the governor’s vetoes.

Brown, the Whitmer spokeswoman, said Mitchell’s speculation that the autism veto was personally aimed at Chatfield was “ridiculous.”

She added: “I am not going to comment on that offensive assertion.”

Gideon D'Assandro, a spokesman for Chatfield, did not answer directly when asked by Detroit Free Press whether Chatfield felt his family was targeted by the autism veto.

"He thinks it's wrong to use any of these groups — students, veterans, drivers, people with autism — as political pawns to get her pet projects and a gas tax hike," D'Assandro said.

State Rep. Beau LaFave, R-Iron Mountain, a persistent critic of the Democratic governor, faults Whitmer for Upper Peninsula veto targets in his district that include $10.7 million for psychiatric services at critical access hospitals, $34.2 million for Medicaid patients at critical access hospitals and $2 million for the state’s first responder communications network.

What what really stood out to LaFave ‒  who has called Whitmer, among other things, “Emperor Whitmer,” for her ban on flavored e-cigarettes ‒ was the tiniest of cuts. Whitmer vetoed $2,500 earmarked for a feasibility study of a military cemetery he backs near Iron Mountain.

“You don’t accidentally line-item veto $2,500 for a veterans cemetery,” LaFave told Bridge. “That is blatantly political. You could find an accounting error of $2,500 in any one of these budgets.” 

Waiting for construction orders

In the meantime, Jackson County resident Hirst said he remains hopeful Andy’s Place will be built soon - despite the impasse.

Plans call for a 42,000-square-foot space with 39 single units and a separate 13,000-square-foot space for families with 11 two-bedroom units. It is a collaboration among the Michigan State Housing Development Authority, Michigan drug courts – and until now – the governor’s office.

It is to be built around access to long-term recovery and housing supports, which experts say can be critical to recovery for those with opioid use disorder.

“We have a construction crew ready to go,” he said.

Hirst worked for years to see this project through – one way he said he could bring meaning from his son’s death.

Andy Hirst died in May 2010, after battling an opioid addiction for six years, one that began with oxycodone and ended with heroin, his father said. Shortly after, Hirst established Andy’s Angels, a nonprofit foundation that provides education on opiate abuse and raised funds for support for families and those suffering from addiction.

But Hirst said if the budget stalemate isn’t resolved soon, it could mean more lives lost to the opioid epidemic.

“We really need to get the footings in the ground before winter sets in,” he said. “This would mean a construction delay of six months, more lives lost, more people who won’t be able to recover from this epidemic.”

Got a budget question?

Do you have a question about the Michigan budget? Email Capitol reporters Riley Beggin at or Jonathan Oosting at 
and it could be the basis of a future story.

Facts matter. Trust matters. Journalism matters.

If you learned something from the story you're reading please consider supporting our work. Your donation allows us to keep our Michigan-focused reporting and analysis free and accessible to all. All donations are voluntary, but for as little as $1 you can become a member of Bridge Club and support freedom of the press in Michigan during a crucial election year.

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Donate now

Comment Form

Add new comment

Dear Reader: We value your thoughts and criticism on the articles, but insist on civility. Criticizing comments or ideas is welcome, but Bridge won’t tolerate comments that are false or defamatory or that demean, personally attack, spread hate or harmful stereotypes. Violating these standards could result in a ban.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.


Tue, 10/08/2019 - 5:15pm

So where are all the Democrats decrying petty partiscianship? This will help her in the future?
She was a hardcore bomb throwing leftist when she was in Lansing before and her true colors are coming out. It is going to be a long 4 years.

middle of the mit
Tue, 10/08/2019 - 9:45pm

[[If the cuts were a tactic to force Republicans to cave on road funding, veteran political analyst and former Republican lawmaker Bill Ballenger said it is one that Whitmer thus far is losing.

“She obviously calculated that what she was doing was so over the top and outrageous that it would drive Republicans back to the bargaining table. Apparently, it’s a misguided strategy and it’s blown up in her face,” Ballenger told Bridge.

Did you see what this same person said about the budget bill?

[["The Republican caucuses in the House and Senate should be given a lot of credit, particularly [Senate Majority Leader] Mike Shirkey and [House Speaker] Lee Chatfield," former GOP legislator Bill Ballenger, the Republicans' most reliable cheerleader, asserted in a pundit roundtable convened by the Michigan Information and Research Service. "They were unified and consistent, and they strung the governor out over a long period of time until she blinked."]]

So when Republicans do it, it's good but when Dems do the same thing?


Good to know you are not partisan.

Wed, 10/09/2019 - 8:15am

Well MOM, Like it or not the Legislature has 100% of the power to appropriate the funds that will be spent. This is the fact not opinion. Until you folks amend the Mi constitution, our Gov has minimal say, but of course that doesn't preclude her from jumping in front of any and all cameras and then veto the same project!

Wed, 10/09/2019 - 10:34am

So sue her. Evidently, you are wrong about that!

middle of the mit
Thu, 10/10/2019 - 5:04pm

Well Matt, if the legislature has 100% of the power to appropriate funds, could you tell me how the Governor was going to able to steal money from the gas tax fund?

Wed, 10/09/2019 - 4:22pm

Put the .45/gal on the ballot!! She can recycle her campaign slogan and spend her time running all over the state and you and all the others here can help stuff envelopes, pass out lit. and put up yard signs. It will be great and I'm sure it will work out well!!! You're not afraid of democracy are you?

middle of the mit
Thu, 10/10/2019 - 5:09pm

Me? Afraid of democracy? Aren't you the one that doesn't like ballot initiatives or voter referendum?

Check your rims diligently!

And don't complain when the roads turn back to gravel up here.

Charlotte Morton
Mon, 10/14/2019 - 7:37pm

What's good for the GOP should be good for the Democrats. Remember the Lame Duck session last Nov. See what it feels like? She has to have something to bargain with, since the GOP won't give any acceptable plans to fix the roads, that don't steal money for important areas. You and I know why she has to do this.

Chuck Fellows
Wed, 10/09/2019 - 9:08am

Another blatant support for republicans refusal to govern. First you present an ultimatum to your opposition. Refuse to communicate with the principles. Then claim your opposition is the problem. Look in the mirror. The real problem is republican insistence that they know better than anyone else, that false fiscal conservatism (they spend on their friends, i.e. the insurance and real estate industries) while using emergency managers to bankrupt local governments, school districts and intentionally poison children. Then penalize lawful applicants for workers compensation benefits and impose bogus drug testing on welfare applicants. And Bridge Magazine and its contributors want to blame a democratic governor. This is beyond stupid, it is indecent behavior and malfeasance in office.

Wed, 10/09/2019 - 4:44pm

Chuck, Are you serious? First you make false allegations against Republicans that have absolutely nothing to do with the topic of the article. then you end with the statement "This is beyond stupid, it is indecent behavior and malfeasance in office." If you're referring to your reply and most Democrat led actions and what Whitmer has done and is doing then I totally agree with you!

Wed, 10/09/2019 - 6:50pm

Thank you Terry for the rebuttal. Excellent comment