Protesters want big police reforms. Michigan lawmakers offer small changes.

Beverly Boatley (far right, standing) attended an NAACP Peace March in Lansing in June to protest police brutality and promote ending qualified immunity. Her grandson was killed by police in Arizona. (Photo by Abigail Censky)

Protests in Michigan cities are still ongoing against racial injustice and police brutality in what is becoming one of the most sustained social movements in memory. After years of police killing African Americans at a disproportionate rate, protesters are calling for revolutionary change. 

But state policymakers haven’t matched this fervor. Four weeks after a Minneapolis police officer killed George Floyd, sparking protests worldwide, Michigan lawmakers have largely offered reforms that even law enforcement officials say would do little to actually change policing. 

Those proposals include bipartisan legislation that would codify police training requirements, ban chokeholds and require officers to intervene if they see another officer using excessive force. 

Activists and experts who spoke with Bridge and WKAR, East Lansing’s NPR member station, said the proposals represent the minimum needed to move toward safer policing, and at worst would do little to truly change a system that many view as fundamentally broken.  

Those seeking more sweeping reform want, among other things: 

  • An end to the “qualified immunity” doctrine that often allow police officers to avoid being held liable for violations of constitutional rights; 
  • Independent investigations in cases where police kill or severely injure people and requirements to prosecute those found at fault. For example, New York state has a team dedicated to investigating police killings of unarmed people and has a number of other independent bodies that are supposed to oversee the NYPD; 
  • An end to policies that obscure an officers’ disciplinary or misconduct history from investigators and the public; 
  • And, in some cases, a reallocation of portions of police funding to community services.

Gov. Gretchen Whitmer has added four non-police seats to a commission that regulates officer training, and a bipartisan group of state lawmakers and law enforcement agencies announced a collaboration in which the state will report data that police agencies are already encouraged — but not required — to report to the Federal Bureau of Investigation. 

Beverly Boatley of Holt is among those who see some of these reforms as well-meaning but not nearly enough. Her grandson, Elijah Boatley, was shot and killed by a sheriff’s deputy in Arizona last fall after he allegedly brandished a gun as deputies sought to arrest him as a suspect in a shooting incident the night before. 

Beverly Boatley said Elijah “had his entire life ahead of him. He wasn’t the hardened criminal they made him out to be.” Police have offered no evidence he was at the site of the shooting he was suspected for, she said, and it took seven months for the family to get basic police reports about the incident. She added that her attorneys haven’t been given access to the officers’ disciplinary records. 

She’s since started a foundation in Elijah’s name to raise awareness of police brutality.

Deaths like her grandson’s have been happening for hundreds of years in America, she said. She’s fed up.

Public officials “continue to come back with bandaids. At some point, they’ve got to go deeper and start to restructure this thing,” Boatley said. 

“If we don’t start seeing some real change, I fear that there’s going to be an issue. People are just not going to continue to sit back while their loved ones are murdered.”

An urgent call to action

Beverly Boatley was among hundreds of people who marched down Michigan Avenue in Lansing this month in the NAACP “We Are Done Dying” Peace March, carrying signs with urgent demands: “We are not target practice,” “get your knee off our necks,” “respect existence or expect resistance.”

In Detroit, daily protests have been ongoing for more than 20 days. Demonstrations continue in Grand Rapids, Flint and even small, rural towns

Protesters calling for an end to police brutality are pushing for expansive reforms that they hope would hold law enforcement accountable. (Photo by Abigail Censky)

While some early protests turned into civil unrest marked by looting and vandalism, the majority have remained peaceful. In several cities, including in Michigan, law enforcement officers knelt or marched with protesters. But police — often seemingly unprovoked — have also responded to protesters with force, including police officers who pushed down a 75-year old man in Buffalo and punched a journalist in the stomach in Washington, D.C. 

Protesters in Michigan and nationwide say it’s time for big policy shifts after years of well-documented inequities in policing. 

According to data compiled by Mapping Police Violence, a research and advocacy group, police killings have remained relatively steady in Michigan and across the country since January 2013. Michigan police killed 123 people between 2013 and 2019, nearly 40 percent of whom were nonwhite, despite these groups making up around 20 percent of the state’s population. 

Boatley’s preferred reform, among others, would be to end qualified immunity — the legal doctrine that often shields police officers from being prosecuted for constitutional violations. 

Tristan Taylor, one of the organizers of Detroit Will Breathe, told Bridge and WKAR he wants an accountability system that will ensure officers involved in police brutality are fired and prosecuted and for a portion of police budgets to be re-routed to community resolution programs.   

Others have endorsed a set of reforms known as “8 Can’t Wait” which includes requiring reporting of use of force and banning police officers from shooting at moving vehicles. They’re based off of more comprehensive reform ideas put forward by activist group Campaign Zero. 

Few of the reforms championed by activists are on the table in the Michigan Legislature, and most of those that are have not yet received a committee hearing. Compare that with states like New York that recently passed laws making chokeholds a felony, requiring disciplinary records be released, mandating officers report every instance of discharging their weapon and more. 

The Legislature can move more quickly to propose and enact reforms — as can city councils, mayors and police chiefs, said DeRay Mckesson, a civil rights activist and co-founder of Campaign Zero. He said what’s been introduced in Michigan is “low-hanging fruit.”

“While it’s a good thing to do, we can't let people okey-dokey us into believing that this is some monumental move. This is the floor, not the ceiling,” Mckesson told Bridge and WKAR. 

“We’ve got to get to the floor so we can make outcomes change, but you can do this really quickly.”

Lansing Mayor Andy Schor speaks with people protesting police brutality outside the Michigan state Capitol. (Photo by Abigail Censky)

What’s on the table

The bill with the most traction in the state Legislature in the four weeks since Floyd’s death has been a proposal from Ann Arbor Sen. Jeff Irwin, a Democrat, which would require all police officers receive de-escalation, implicit bias and mental health training. 

Critics of the bill argue it’s simply codifying existing police training requirements and would have little impact without an evidence-based curriculum, regular testing and re-training over time. 

Both Mckesson and Ayesha Bell Hardaway, a professor of criminal justice at Case Western Reserve University School of Law who is on a team evaluating police reforms in Cleveland, said that while training requirements are a good idea, there isn’t enough evidence to indicate they’ll make a difference in police behavior. 

“Quite honestly, without knowing what the curriculum looks like and who’s delivering that training it’s hard to understand if it will really be effective,” Hardaway said. 

It would also require officers to complete a number of continuing education hours annually throughout their career “in subjects related to law enforcement,” a new requirement that Rep. Steve Johnson, R-Wayland, questioned as overly vague.

Sen. Jeff Irwin

A proposal from Ann Arbor Sen. Jeff Irwin, a Democrat, would require all police officers receive de-escalation, implicit bias and mental health training. 

Irwin acknowledges the bill “just isn’t enough” to fundamentally change policing practices and said that he has other proposals based on Campaign Zero that would require more citizen oversight boards, independent investigations into police misconduct and demilitarization of agencies that he plans to introduce. 

“These are small steps and we need to do more, we need to do much more,” Irwin said. “But we also need to make progress when we can and take these small wins when we can.”

A bipartisan group of lawmakers and law enforcement officials announced last week it would be releasing Michigan-specific, use-of-force data collected by the FBI under a new program. But that program is optional, and only 40 percent of agencies nationwide participate. Just under three-quarters of Michigan agencies participated in the program in 2019, according to the state’s first report released last Wednesday.

Other bills, introduced by Sen. Peter Lucido, R-Shelby Township and Sen. Ruth Johnson, R-Holly, would ban officers from putting pressure on a person’s throat or windpipe and would require officers to intervene when they see others using excessive force. Johnson’s bill would also require agencies to punish those officers who fail to intervene. The Minneapolis Police Department had a duty to intervene policy when George Floyd was killed, but strengthened it after his death to make it enforceable in court. 

These proposals haven’t yet received a committee hearing in Michigan.

Law enforcement representatives argue that these, too, represent practices that are already controlled by current guidelines. 

Chokeholds or other measures of blocking someone’s windpipe except in emergency situations would be considered excessive force, said Robert Stevenson, executive director of the Michigan Association of Chiefs of Police, and a duty to intervene is required of those police departments that are accredited by the association and is inherent in the creed all police officers must take. However, that doesn’t carry the force of law.

Stevenson said the protests have indicated to many police chiefs that “maybe we need to speed up some actions” of reform, but he pushed back on the idea that law enforcement is due for an overhaul. 

“Policing is always in the process of reform, we’re always changing,” he said. The killing of George Floyd has “been universally condemned by civilians and police alike. People assume that’s a norm, rather than the exception. It’s definitely the exception.”

These proposals are a good start, Hardaway of Case Western Reserve University said, in that they provide “a state level of reforms instead of doing it haphazard from one municipality or local department to the next.”

But without real accountability measures, reporting requirements and a significant reining-in of police unions’ powers to protect officers from punishment for misconduct, the problem will likely persist, she said. 

“Until there is a real conversation that's built on respect for communities that have been impacted by policing, moving the needle in a significant way through incremental reforms will, in fact, be difficult,” Hardaway said. “We may find ourselves here again.”

Multiple activists and experts expressed some optimism at proposals by Attorney General Dana Nessel, which would allow the state commission that sets law enforcement standards to revoke an officer’s license for a broader range of misconduct and create a statewide misconduct registry. Those proposals have not yet been introduced as legislation and would not necessarily require disciplinary records to be reported to the state or made public; it would only require police departments to retain them.

“This is the pattern that we’ve seen. The measures that would actually make substantive change are the measures that are not in the legislation. Politicians put it up as talking points,” Taylor of Detroit Will Breathe said. 

Hardaway and Rev. Wendell Anthony, president of the Detroit Branch NAACP, said effective policies must include real enforcement mechanisms — such as requiring law enforcement agencies to report all misconduct to the state — and noted that police reform proposals are often shaped without input from communities of color. They urged lawmakers to listen.  

“The community determines the kinds of rules, regulations and mandates that police departments will have,” Anthony said. “If you don’t have that, then what you have is the militarization of the community — a police state.”

Why is real change so hard?

America’s problems with police brutality have existed nearly as long as it has had police

Police still kill Black people at more than 2.5 times the rate they do white people, according to Mapping Police Violence, a research and advocacy group, despite an upsurge in activism after 18-year-old Michael Brown was shot and killed by a white police officer in Ferguson, Missouri in 2014. 

Activists who spoke with Bridge and WKAR questioned why police reform is so difficult to enact into law. 

Many pointed to the power of police unions, which are often effective in protecting officers’ disciplinary records from scrutiny and in getting officers rehired who have been fired from their jobs. Police are still considered trustworthy by more than two-thirds of Americans and remain a powerful force in state and local politics.

“The police unions have been pretty intractable on (many proposed reforms), and they've held a lot of sway with the legislature,” Nessel said in an interview. “No candidate for the legislature once to be called anti-police.”

Data compiled from state records by the Michigan Campaign Finance Network show that state legislators in both parties pulled in tens of thousands of dollars collectively in contributions from police unions and advocacy organizations over the last decade. 

“When politicians accept campaign donations from law enforcement, they’re really granting law enforcement access into policymaking,” said Sasha de Vogel, a PhD candidate at the University of Michigan who works with No More Cop Money, a project advocating for policymakers to decline political donations from police unions. 

“When they take money from these organizations they signal something about their values, so they can stop doing that to signal something different about their values.”

But amid the millions of dollars spent every election season in Michigan, many of those seeking change said police spending is not the main obstacle to change.

Lawmakers and law enforcers are part of the same system, said Taylor of Detroit Will Breathe. 

“They are the mechanism of enforcement of policies that these politicians create. That gives them undue influence into how those policies look,” he said. 

Sen. Johnson, who sponsored the duty-to-intervene legislation, chalked up the slow pace of reform to the ease of setting roadblocks on controversial legislation. 

“It’s always easy to stop somebody’s bill,” he said. “It’s certainly harder to get one through and get everybody on board.” 

Facts matter. Trust matters. Journalism matters.

If you learned something from the story you're reading please consider supporting our work. Your donation allows us to keep our Michigan-focused reporting and analysis free and accessible to all. All donations are voluntary, but for as little as $1 you can become a member of Bridge Club and support freedom of the press in Michigan during a crucial election year.

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Donate now

Comment Form

Add new comment

Dear Reader: We value your thoughts and criticism on the articles, but insist on civility. Criticizing comments or ideas is welcome, but Bridge won’t tolerate comments that are false or defamatory or that demean, personally attack, spread hate or harmful stereotypes. Violating these standards could result in a ban.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.


Lauren M
Mon, 06/22/2020 - 10:46am

Very much appreciate this article, its resources, and it's willingness to layout the calls for reform and what the defund movement is seeking. People writing of protests as unorganized or not having clear goals are the ones most likely to turn off potential advocates of the movement and it is huge to have news sources willing to highlight how organized and thought-out the work put into these protests and movements is.

Mon, 06/22/2020 - 6:01pm

As I now see it the, "protesters", really want to destroy this nation and it's laws, history and culture,,,big fat NO to that! Reign in some police actions and protections, sure, time for that,,,enforce the Bill Of Rights,,would be a good starting point!

Tue, 06/23/2020 - 2:03pm

I can't speak for all the protesters, but I certainly want to see America as it is today (a proto-fascist imperial police state) torn down. Our ossified systems no longer serve the majority of the people (it's arguable if they ever did) and the mechanisms for change are proving themselves to be futile and functionless. Our founding documents are inadequate for providing security, prosperity, and real democracy for all in the 21st century and clearly need to be revisited.

Black Lives, Bl...
Mon, 06/22/2020 - 12:46pm

The police departments across the country are given the tremendous authority to use government sanctioned force, lethal when required, to maintain civil order and provide safety. Departments need the resources to hire, train and supervise officers to protect and serve their communities with professionalism and empathy. Most officers, just as human as the rest of us, take their responsibilities with seriousness. Those who do fall short need to be held accountable.

That said, the 800,000 police officers in the US make great scapegoats for the failures of individuals, politicians and communities. Included in the 10 of millions of official officer-citizen interactions that happen each year are encounters with bad people acting their worst. Consider the facts of each infrequent fatal interaction on their own merit, not through a lens created to see a particular narrative. You will find that the vast majority of officers conduct themselves admirably in the overwhelming majority of circumstances; they are not our enemies.

Mon, 06/22/2020 - 6:46pm

Isn't there some small troubled community (like Hamtramak for instance?) we could put these little darlings in charge of to put all their great ideas into practice?

Tue, 06/23/2020 - 2:05pm

Dogwhistling racism while loudly demonstrating that you either don't understand the power imbalances and economic structures at play, or you do, and are being your usual disingenuous self

Paul Jordan
Tue, 06/23/2020 - 10:31am

The people of Michigan need to do much more to better focus the police on enhancing public safety. Too frequently, American police agencies' actions reflect their sad origins in the slave patrols that were used to terrorize and otherwise control African Americans. Too many police agencies act as if their job is control black people! That must stop.
So many police agencies make it a point of using the most trivial excuses to pull over black drivers. (For example, Sen. Tim Scott--the only black Republican United States senator--mentioned last week that he recently had been pulled over because, the policeman said, he hadn't used his turn signal soon enough! That would NOT have happened to a white driver.) These sort of harassing traffic stops have often turned into deadly or terrifying confrontations for African American drivers. At a minimum, they are humiliating and dehumanizing.
Police agencies should be required to report relevant information on the race of stopped drivers to the state and public so that patterns of disproportionate policing can be revealed and addressed.

Wed, 06/24/2020 - 1:17am

It seems Riley Beggin, Abigail Censky, Bridge editor have become de facto publicists for those protesting the police. All that is ‘reported’ are the wants of the protestors, not once is there a question of those promoting their wants about how that could affect current public safety, not a question about the practical application of the wants.
There isn’t even ‘reporting’ on why the protestors want what they want, why no ‘reporting’ about what ‘qualified immunity’ is, not even why it was created. Why does it seem that these reporters, their editor, and even Bridge want to keep readers so uninformed? It is disappointing that we have to hope readers offer different perspectives on the articles because we aren’t getting a diversity of perspective within the article.
We are facing significant issues that seem to be driven by personal power politics and there is nowhere for us to turn to make ourselves better informed, and this article show it is not Bridge, not reading Beggin and Censky. It seems Bridge sets a higher standard for readers [in that short paragraph about civility and no harmful stereotypes] while they let their reporter post such one sided article that reinforces the protestors image that police officers have always done wrong and need more control and no protection from the public. If Bridge care about accurate reporting they would establish simple paragraph for reports like they have for commenting readers.